Internet-based Conversational Engagement Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT02871921
Last Updated: 2024-04-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
186 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-01
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of a Multimodal Brain Health Intervention for Older African Americans
NCT04863378
Community Discussions and Social Participation
NCT07013357
Mobile Health Intervention to Support Healthful Diet
NCT05236712
Digital InteGrated Behavioral TreatmeNt for Comorbid ObesITy and DeprEssion Among Racial and Ethnic Adults Age 50 and Older
NCT06636058
The Impact of a Telephone Reminiscence Program
NCT05977608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conversational Engagement
Participants engage in 30-minute face-to-face communications with study staff through internet/webcam 4 times per week for 24 weeks (6 months). Under an exploratory aim, a limited number of participants will be further followed by sustaining dose of 2 times per week of 30 minutes session for additional 24 weeks (6 months). Conversational staff will facilitate content-standardized but naturalistic-style social engagement. Staff and participants will engage in conversation about a wide variety of topics that are culturally and personally relevant and interesting to participants. Each day, participants will be able to choose from topic options. Participants will also receive a phone call once per week that lasts approximately 10 minutes; interviewers ask brief questions to monitor participant social activities and health conditions.
Conversational Engagement
Examine whether increasing social interaction through face-to-face (video chat) conversations could improve cognitive function and whether the efficacy is mediated by improved psychological well-being, targeting older adults aged 75 and older who are socially isolated
Control Group
Participants will receive a phone call once per week that lasts approximately 10 minutes; interviewers ask brief questions to monitor participant social activities and health conditions
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conversational Engagement
Examine whether increasing social interaction through face-to-face (video chat) conversations could improve cognitive function and whether the efficacy is mediated by improved psychological well-being, targeting older adults aged 75 and older who are socially isolated
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Consent to MRI (if physically able to receive one)
3. Socially isolated, defined by at least one of the following:
i. Score ≤12 on the 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), ii. Engages in conversations lasting 30 minutes or longer no more than twice per week, per subject self-report iii. Answers "Often" to at least one question on the Hughes et al. Three-Item Loneliness Scale
4. Adequate vision to use study technology and complete all neuropsychological tests throughout the study, defined by the following two criteria:
i. See well enough to complete the MoCA ii. See well enough to read a newspaper, wearing glasses if needed but not using a magnifying glass
5. Adequate hearing to use study technology and complete all neuropsychological tests throughout the study, defined as i. Able to hear well enough to complete the telephone screening ii. Able to hear well enough to complete the MoCA
6. Sufficient ability to understand English in order to complete protocol-required testing
7. Normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as assessed by the trial neuropsychologist
8. Sufficiently able to comply with protocol assessments and procedures, in the opinion of the investigator
Exclusion Criteria
i. Self-reported diseases associated with dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, front temporal dementia, normal pressure hydrocephalus, or Parkinson's disease ii. Diagnosis of dementia by trial neuropsychologist
2. Anticipating major change in living arrangement within the upcoming year
3. Severely depressed, operationally defined as a 15-item GDS score \> 7
4. Significant disease of the central nervous system, such as brain tumor, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, or significant stroke, per subject report
5. Current (within 2 years of screening) alcohol or substance abuse
6. Unstable or significantly symptomatic psychiatric disorder, such as major depression, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder, or bipolar disorder
7. Unstable or significantly symptomatic cardiovascular disease, such as coronary artery disease with frequent angina, or congestive heart failure with shortness of breath at rest
8. Unstable insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, defined as meeting any of the following criteria:
i. Received a diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes ii. Started taking insulin within 3 months of the screening visit iii. Been hospitalized for hypoglycemia within one year of screening
9. Active systemic cancer within 5 years of the screening visit (Gleason Grade \< 3 prostate cancer and non-metastatic skin cancers are acceptable)
10. Surgery that required full sedation with intubation within 6 months of screening (sedation for minor procedures is acceptable)
11. More than one overnight hospital stay within 3 months of the screening visit
12. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is severe enough to cause study participation to have a negative impact on participant or study team rights or wellbeing.
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Michigan
OTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Wayne State University
OTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hiroko Hayama Dodge
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hiroko Dodge, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science Univeristy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yu K, Wild K, Potempa K, Hampstead BM, Lichtenberg PA, Struble LM, Pruitt P, Alfaro EL, Lindsley J, MacDonald M, Kaye JA, Silbert LC, Dodge HH. The Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) in Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol and COVID-19 Related Study Modifications. Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 25;3:714813. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.714813. eCollection 2021.
Tang F, Chen J, Dodge HH, Zhou J. The Joint Effects of Acoustic and Linguistic Markers for Early Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Digit Health. 2022 Feb 11;3:702772. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.702772. eCollection 2021.
Liu G, Xue Z, Zhan L, Dodge HH, Zhou J. Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Language Markers with Crossmodal Augmentation. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2023;28:7-18.
Chen L, Dodge HH, Asgari M. Topic-Based Measures of Conversation for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment. Proc Conf Assoc Comput Linguist Meet. 2020 Jul;2020:63-67.
Wu CY, Mattek N, Wild K, Miller LM, Kaye JA, Silbert LC, Dodge HH. Can changes in social contact (frequency and mode) mitigate low mood before and during the COVID-19 pandemic? The I-CONECT project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Mar;70(3):669-676. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17607. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
Yu K, Wild K, Dowling NM, Kaye JA, Silbert LC, Dodge HH. Emotional characteristics of socially isolated older adults with MCI using tablet administered NIH toolbox: I-CONECT study. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Nov 11;14(1):e12372. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12372. eCollection 2022.
Dodge HH, Yu K, Wu CY, Pruitt PJ, Asgari M, Kaye JA, Hampstead BM, Struble L, Potempa K, Lichtenberg P, Croff R, Albin RL, Silbert LC; I-CONECT Team. Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) Among Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old With Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment: Topline Results. Gerontologist. 2024 Apr 1;64(4):gnad147. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad147.
Wu CY, Chen L, Dickson JR, Zhang B, Arnold SE, Dodge HH. Synthetic control methods for n-of-1 and parallel-group trials in Alzheimer's disease: A proof-of-concept study using the I-CONECT. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70460. doi: 10.1002/alz.70460.
Yuan F, Zhou W, Dodge HH, Zhao X. Short: Causal structural learning of conversational engagement for socially isolated older adults. Smart Health (Amst). 2023 Jun;28:100384. doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2023.100384. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Study Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.