Comparison of PDT Combination With Ranibizumab vs. Ranibizumab Monotherapy in Persistent PCV With Initial Loading Dose

NCT ID: NCT02864472

Last Updated: 2016-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of early intervention of PDT combination compared with consecutive monthly treatment of intravitreal ranibizumab injections in PCV patients showing insufficient response with initial loading dose.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PCV is generally recognized as a subtype of wet AMD characterized by the presence of aneurysmal orange-red polypoidal lesions with or without branching vascular network (BVN) in the choroidal vasculature as observed on indocyanine angiography (ICGA), representing 13% to 54.7% of newly diagnosed patients with neovascular AMD. Fifty percent of PCV had persistent leakage or recurrent bleeding with poor visual outcome, if left untreated.

And in the EVEREST study has shown that synergistic effects of anti-VEGF and vPDT combination: vPDT strongly regress polyp and anti-VEGF control to up-regulation of VEGF induced by vPDT compared to ranibizumab monotherapy in newly diagnosed PCV patients. Additionally, combination offers an opportunity for individualized treatment with potentially fewer treatments and less costs.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of early intervention of PDT combination compared with consecutive monthly treatment of intravitreal ranibizumab injections in PCV patients showing insufficient response with initial loading dose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Age-related Macular Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

combination Tx

combination Tx(vPDT +ranibizumab) (M0) + ranibizumab PRN (M3-6)

Group Type OTHER

PDT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PDT and ranibizumab

ranibizumab PRN

Intervention Type DRUG

ranibizumab PRN

mono Tx

Ranibizumab (at 4 weeks interval) \*3 (M0-2) + ranibizumab PRN (M3-6)

Group Type OTHER

Ranibizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Ranibizumab

ranibizumab PRN

Intervention Type DRUG

ranibizumab PRN

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PDT

PDT and ranibizumab

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ranibizumab

Ranibizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

ranibizumab PRN

ranibizumab PRN

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lucentis Lucentis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age equal to or older than 50 years
2. Insufficient responder to ranibizumab Tx
3. ICGA-confirmed PCV
4. BCVA letter score of 73 to 24 using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts
5. Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior treatment with other anti-VEGF treatments in the study eye.
2. Prior treatment with other anti-VEGF treatments within 3 months prior to Visit 1 in the non-study eye.
3. Prior treatment with verteporfin within 6 months prior to Visit 1 in the study eye.
4. Prior treatment with verteporfin within 7 days prior to Visit 1 in the non-study eye.
5. Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation involving the foveal center in the study eye
6. Previous submacular surgery in the study eye
7. A history of angioid streaks, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, or pathologic myopia
8. Experienced RPE tear, retinal detachment, macular hole, or uncontrolled glaucoma
9. Previous participation in a clinical trial involving anti-angiogenic drugs
10. Intraocular surgery: 2 months before Visit 1 in the study eye.
11. Previous participation in any studies of investigational drugs
12. Administration of periocular, intravitreal, or systemic corticosteroid in the previous 3 months.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jangwon Heo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jangwon Heo, MD

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2072-2438

Serang Choi, MD

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2072-2953

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Wong RLM et al. J Ophthalmol Vis Res 2013;8:359-71. 2. Koh A et al. Retina 2013;33:686-716 3. Nakashizuka H et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4729-37 4. Gomi F, Tano Y Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:208-12 5. Honda S et al. Ophthalmologica 2014;231:59-74 6. Maruko E et al. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:15-22 7. Byeon S et al. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2008;52:57-62 8. Uyama M et al. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:639-48

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRFB002AKR16T

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.