Visual Outcome in Patients With Symptomatic Macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV) Treated With Either Ranibizumab as Monotherapy or Combined With Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (vPDT)

NCT ID: NCT01846273

Last Updated: 2019-06-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

321 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-07

Study Completion Date

2017-03-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compared the effect of ranibizumab administered as monotherapy versus ranibizumab administered in combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) on visual acuity in patients with symptomatic macular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The results of this study provided long-term safety and efficacy data used to generate further guidance on the management of patients with PCV.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were randomized to the study in 2 treatment groups: ranibizumab + vPDT combination therapy, and ranibizumab monotherapy. Based on the results of the primary analysis at Month 12, patients still in the ranibizumab monotherapy group at the time of the switch cut-off time point were switched to the ranibizumab + vPDT combination therapy group until study exit. A total of 168 and 154 patients were included in the ranibizumab + vPDT combined therapy and ranibizumab monotherapy groups, respectively for the FAS (Month 12 analysis). However, the safety set included 172 and 149 patients, respectively. Four patients in the combination therapy group never took vPDT . Among them, 1 patient actually received verteporfin injection but no laser injection. Thus a total of 3 patients (4-1) in the combination therapy group did not take the actual full vPDT treatment. Additionally, 7 patients in the monotherapy group received vPDT and 1 patient from the monotherapy group did not receive ranibizumab treatment. Considering the above numbers, safety set included 172 patients (i.e., 168-3+7) in the ranibizumab + vPDT combination therapy group and 149 patients (i.e., 154-7+3-1) in the ranibizumab monotherapy group for Month 12 analysis. For the Month 24 safety analysis, the 14 patients in the ranibizumab monotherapy group who were switched to ranibizumab +vPDT combination therapy group were analyzed as a separate group, ie, ranibizumab 0.5 mg + vPDT (switched).

.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Age-related Macular Degeneration Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ranibizumab + vPDT

Treatment initiation with Ranibizumab and verteporfin PDT (vPDT), with re-treatment need (either Ranibizumab alone or combined with vPDT) determined at monthly visits based on defined retreatment criteria

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ranibizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab

Verteporfin PDT

Intervention Type DRUG

Infusion of 30 ml verteporfin in 5% dextrose solution followed by 83 sec of laser light (50J/cm2; 600mW/cm2; 689 nm)

Ranibizumab monotherapy

Treatment initiation with Ranibizumab and Sham PDT, with re-treatment need (either Ranibizumab alone or combined with Sham PDT) determined at monthly visits based on defined retreatment criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ranibizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab

Sham PDT

Intervention Type DRUG

Infusion of 30 ml 5% dextrose solution followed by 83 sec of laser light (50J/cm2; 600mW/cm2; 689 nm)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ranibizumab

Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Verteporfin PDT

Infusion of 30 ml verteporfin in 5% dextrose solution followed by 83 sec of laser light (50J/cm2; 600mW/cm2; 689 nm)

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham PDT

Infusion of 30 ml 5% dextrose solution followed by 83 sec of laser light (50J/cm2; 600mW/cm2; 689 nm)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lucentis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic macular PCV in the study eye
* A qualifying vision score at study entry
* A qualifying lesion size in the study eye at study entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Active inflammation or infection in the study eye
* Uncontrolled intraocular pressure in the stuy eye
* Ocular condition in the study eye which may impact vision and confound study outcomes
* Prior treatment of the study eye with anti-VEGF therapy, verteporfin PDT, other laser and surgical interventions, intraocular corticosteroids
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amagasaki, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tsu, Mie-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ohtsu-city, Shiga, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, Korea, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, Seocho-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Songkhla, Hat Yai, Thailand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong Japan Malaysia Singapore South Korea Taiwan Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yanagi Y, Mori R, Teo KYC, Park KH, Ngah NF, Chen SJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, Kondo N, Lee WK, Rajagopalan R, Obata R, Wong IYH, Chee C, Terasaki H, Sekiryu T, Chen SC, Lai TYY, Cheung G, Honda S. Six-year findings of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in the EVEREST II study: Japanese subgroup analysis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01228-w. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40504425 (View on PubMed)

Teo KYC, Park KH, Ngah NF, Chen SJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, Mori R, Kondo N, Lee WK, Rajagopalan R, Obata R, Wong IYH, Chee C, Terasaki H, Sekiryu T, Chen SC, Yanagi Y, Honda S, Lai TYY, Cheung CMG. Six-Year Outcomes in Subjects with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in the EVEREST II Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Apr;13(4):935-954. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00888-0. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38308746 (View on PubMed)

Lim TH, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, Wong TY, Chen LJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, Tan CS, Lee WK, Cheung CMG, Ngah NF, Patalauskaite R, Margaron P, Koh A; EVEREST II Study Group. Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 1;138(9):935-942. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32672800 (View on PubMed)

Koh A, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, Wong TY, Chen LJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, Tan CS, Feller C, Margaron P, Lim TH, Lee WK; EVEREST II study group. Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 1;135(11):1206-1213. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4030.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28983556 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRFB002A2412

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.