Role of Prophylaxis by Oral Fluid Supplementation in Prevention of Postdural Puncture Headache
NCT ID: NCT02859233
Last Updated: 2019-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
554 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-08
2019-07-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For preventing PDPH, there are some uncomfortable practices for patients (fluid supplementation and bed rest) and expensive for hospital (time spend for information and management of fluid intake). Patients are usually advised by nurses. If "bed rest" is not effective in prevention of PDPH, "fluid supplementation" is not an advice based on any evidence but only on routine. By this trial, the investigators want to evaluate the scientific value of this advice, in the standard patient care.
The primary objective of this study is to compare oral hyperhydration (2 liters during 2 hours after lumbar puncture - the most common routine according to an internal pilot survey) versus no advice about the fluid intake to prevent the PDPH.
The second objective is to observe the day of apparition of PDPH, between day 0 and day 5.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aminophylline for Patients With Post-Dural Puncture Headache
NCT02522013
Establishment of a Predictive Model for Post-dural Puncture Headache
NCT06800859
Post Dural Puncture Headache After Accidental Dural Puncture
NCT01448590
Maintaining a Prone Position After Use of an Epidural Blood Patch for the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache
NCT02427009
Reducing Orthostatic Intolerance With Oral Rehydration in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients
NCT02854683
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For preventing PDPH, there are some uncomfortable practices for patients (fluid supplementation and bed rest) and expensive for hospital (time spend for information and management of fluid intake). Patients are usually advised by nurses. If "bed rest" is not effective in prevention of PDPH, "fluid supplementation" is not an advice based on any evidence but only on routine. By this trial, the investigators want to evaluate the scientific value of this advice by non-inferiority study, in the standard patient care.
The primary objective of this study is to compare oral hyperhydration (2 liters during 2 hours after lumbar puncture - the most common routine according to an internal pilot survey) versus no advice about the fluid intake to prevent the PDPH. It will be evaluated on the occurrence of PDPH in both of the two groups The second objective is to observe the day of apparition of PDPH, between day 0 and day 5.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Routine advices about the interest of increase fluid after lumbar puncture to prevent PDPH will be transmitted: 2 liters will be provided to be drunk in 2 hours.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventional group
Lack of hyperhydration : no particular advices will be transmitted about the interest of oral hyperhydration. 500 milliliters will be provided in case of thirst, according to patient's convenience.
Lack of hyperhydration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lack of hyperhydration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 60 years old.
* Patient willing to participate in the research.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication for increased oral fluid intake.
* Previous dural puncture within 5 day prior enrollment.
* Parenteral fluid intake superior at 266 ml for 2 hours after dural puncture (1000 ml per day).
* Enteral artificial feeding.
* Patient not in capacity to understand correctly French.
* Patient whose cannot be followed correctly by phone.
* Patient refusing to participate in the study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emmanuelle CARTRON
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nantes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital centre CHD VENDEE
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
Hospital centre LE MANS
Le Mans, , France
University Hospital NANTES
Nantes, , France
Hospital centre CORNOUAILLE
Quimper, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Ciapponi A, Roque i Figuls M, Munoz L, Bonfill Cosp X. Posture and fluids for preventing post-dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):CD009199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009199.pub3.
Armon C, Evans RW; Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Addendum to assessment: Prevention of post-lumbar puncture headaches [RETIRED]: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005 Aug 23;65(4):510-2. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000173034.96211.1b.
Dieterich M, Brandt T. Incidence of post-lumbar puncture headache is independent of daily fluid intake. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237(4):194-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00449906.
Cartron E, Volteau C, Leroy M, Voisine A, Dauvergne JE, Ballet C, Talarmin JP, Queau MA, Catinault M, Gazeau E, Haubertin C, Charreau R, Boutoille D. Oral fluid supplementation for the prevention of post-dural puncture headache: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2025 Mar 12;20(3):e0319481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319481. eCollection 2025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC16_0031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.