Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-19
2017-10-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: To determine whether the binocular vision provided by 3D laparoscopic systems provides benefits during laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to the monocular vision provided by high-resolution 4K systems.
Methods: A randomised controlled trial of 3D HD versus 4K laparoscopic systems will be performed, comparing the time to complete laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and error scores.
Impact: This study is a unique, first-of-its-kind investigation into two new surgical technologies, and is the first study to involve a 4K system. The uptake of three-dimensional systems has been curbed by financial cost and the limitations of early 3D technologies. This study aims to determine which system may be the safest, quickest and most cost- effective, in order to guide future investment and technological development towards either 3D or 2D systems. In addition, these systems may also aid in the learning curve of trainee surgeons.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Imaging in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
NCT01930344
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Cholecystectomy
NCT02396927
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Cholecystectomy
NCT02357589
Does 3D Visualisation Improve Performance of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Junior Surgeons?
NCT03143426
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3D laparoscopy
Patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a 3D laparoscopic system
3D laparoscopy
4K laparoscopy
Patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a 4K laparoscopic system
4K laparoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3D laparoscopy
4K laparoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
3. Medically fit for discharge as day case
4. Age 18 to 85 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. Emergency cholecystectomy
3. Not medically fit for discharge as day case
4. Age \<18 or \>85 years
5. Conversion to open cholecystectomy
6. History of upper abdominal surgery
7. Recent/current involvement in another clinical trial
8. Common bile duct exploration at time of operation
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matt Dunstan
Surgical Research Registrar
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16SURN204848
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.