Efficiency of a Nurse-led Self-management Education Intervention in Promoting Safety Knowledge and Skills of Patients With Arthritis Treated Par Biologics

NCT ID: NCT02855320

Last Updated: 2019-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-27

Study Completion Date

2018-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background : Inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) are painful chronic diseases which impair quality of life and work capacity. Biologics are very effective and widely used therapies. However, they are known to entail risks, particularly of infections. The risk of severe infections is of 5%/patient-year with a maximum during the first six month after the initiation of the first biologic therapy.

Patient education (PE) is recommended for the management of chronic diseases. In the case of biologics, PE aims to help patients to learn specific skills particularly on safety issues, e.g stopping the biologic treatment in case of fever or surgery. Safety skills are assessed by the validated BIOSECURE questionnaire. PE seems efficient for safety skills in a few non-randomized studies. In 2010 a national cross sectional survey on 677 patients showed that the risk of incorrect answers in the BIOSECURE questionnaire was 4 times lower among patients who had benefited from an education by a nurse or other kind of educational process (OR =3,8 IC95% :\[1,68-8,8\].

Aims and Hypothesis: this trial aims to investigate the effects of a nurse-led self-management education face to face intervention on safety skills of patients with arthritis treated par sub cutaneous biologics. Our hypothesis is that the intervention group will report better skills at the 6 months follow up compared to usual care i.e information by the rheumatologist in current consultation.

Methods : multicentric randomized controlled open trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome. The intervention group will have a nurse education consultation at M 0 and M3 in addition to the usual care by the rheumatologist. The nurse will assess the patients' health beliefs and educational needs, focusing on safety skills, self-injections and motivation. The control group will have usual care by the rheumatologist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) are painful chronic diseases which impair quality of life and work capacity. Biologics are very effective and widely used therapies. However, they are known to entail risks, particularly of infections, such as pulmonary infections, tuberculosis, and a few cases of opportunist infections.. The risk of severe infections is of 5%/patient-year with a maximum during the first six month after the initiation of the first biologic therapy.

Patient education (PE) is recommended for the management of chronic diseases. In the case of biologics, PE aims to help patients to learn specific skills particularly on safety issues, e.g stopping the biologic treatment in case of fever or surgery. Safety skills are assessed by the validated BIOSECURE questionnaire, a 54 item questionnaire assessing patients competences to deal with fever, infections, vaccination, and other daily life situations ie travelling, surgery, pregnancy. PE seems efficient for safety skills in a few non-randomized studies. In 2010 a national cross sectional survey on 677 patients showed that the risk of incorrect answers in the BIOSECURE questionnaire was 4 times lower among patients who had benefited from an education by a nurse or other kind of educational process (OR =3,8 IC95% :\[1,68-8,8\]. Although PE is recommended, a small rate of patients are proposed PE : in the national survey only 30% patients had had a face to face nurse consultation and for 11% patients the nurse consultation was part of a self-management program.

When a biotherapy is initiated, the initiation period is known to be critical for the patients motivation, particularly for patients treated by sub cutaneous biotherapy.

Aims and Hypothesis: this trial aims to investigate, as a primary outcome, the effects of a nurse-led self-management education face to face intervention on safety skills of patients with arthritis treated par sub cutaneous biologics. Our hypothesis is that the intervention group will report better skills at the 6 months follow up compared to usual care i.e information by the rheumatologist in current consultation. As the treatment initiation period is of importance, this trial will also include, as secondary outcomes, disease activity coping, patient's quality of life, self-efficacy. Our hypothesis is that the nurse intervention will increase motivation with positive effects on disease activity, patient's quality of life and coping, as well as self-efficacy.

Methods : multicentric randomized controlled open trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome.

The pre selection visit will take place during the medical consultation. The rheumatologist will check the eligibility criteria. Eligible patients will receive written information and will be invited to participate in the RCT. The pre selection visit and the selection visit will possibly be done during the same medical consultation. At the selection visit a M0, the patients will sign the non-opposition form, will be assessed for baseline characteristics and complete the questionnaires. The randomization schedule will be prepared by the biostatistician using a computer-generated random numbers. The randomization will take place after the medical consultation and completion of the baseline assessment, in order to preserve the blinding. After randomization, the participants will be either in the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). Patients of the intervention group will be referred to the nurse, the same day or within 2 weeks ( maximum 4 weeks) after inclusion.

Intervention group. The intervention group will benefit from the nurse intervention in addition to usual care : follow up by their rheumatologist in hospital or private care according to usual management of biologics treatment.

Nurse intervention At M0, the nurse face to face intervention will include 1/ assessment of the patients' health beliefs and educational needs towards arthritis and treatment through a semi directive questionnaire to enhance communication 2/ Information about biologics 3/ specific education on safety skills and self-injections 4/ Motivational communication on biologics treatment. At M3, the nurse will communicate on the patient's experience and motivation and will reinforce the safety messages.

The MO and M3 intervention will last approximately 1 hour 30. The actual duration of the consultation will be left to the nurse's appreciation depending on the patient's needs and will be collected.

The nurse intervention has been standardized through physical meeting among the centers leading to the development of a dedicated educational booklet including : the components of the educational diagnosis, assessment of the patients of educational needs, safety messages and motivational messages. The elaboration of the booklet is derived from previous work on the BIOSECURE study, recommendations for PE and previous work on educational needs of arthritis patients.

All the nurses have been trained for patient education and self-management (University 1 year curriculum or minimum 40 hours training) and specifically for safety issues of biologics.

Control group. The control group will be followed up by their rheumatologist in hospital or private care according to usual management of biologics treatment.

Baseline characteristics

Baseline assessment will include demographics features, age, gender, education level, disease duration, type of arthritis ( RA versus SpA), disease activity measured by the DAS 28 (Disease Activity index) for the patients with RA and the BASDAI ( Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index) for the patients with SpA, comorbidities, patients previous self-reported knowledge, quality of life (SF12), coping and psychological well-being (VASs from the RAID score, AHI Arthritis helplessness index), Disease activity (DAS, ASDAS, BASDAI), beliefs about medication ( BMQ)

Final assessment

Patients of both groups (IG and CG) will be assessed at M6 for primary and secondary outcomes. The administration of the questionnaires will be done by a member of the multidisciplinary team blinded for the treatment group. An additional nurse consultation will be proposed independently to the trial to the patients especially those whose safety knowledge will be proved to be inadequate at M6 assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Spondyloarthritis (SpA)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PE (patient education)

Nurse-led self-management education intervention : The intervention group will benefit from the nurse intervention in addition to usual care : follow up by their rheumatologist in hospital or private care according to usual management of biologics treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nurse-led self-management education intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

A nurse education consultation at M 0 and M3 in addition to the usual care by the rheumatologist. The nurse will assess the patients' health beliefs and educational needs, focusing on safety skills, self-injections and motivation. The control group will have usual care by the rheumatologist.

Standard

The control group will be followed up by their rheumatologist in hospital or private care according to usual management of biologics treatment.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nurse-led self-management education intervention

A nurse education consultation at M 0 and M3 in addition to the usual care by the rheumatologist. The nurse will assess the patients' health beliefs and educational needs, focusing on safety skills, self-injections and motivation. The control group will have usual care by the rheumatologist.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nurse-led patient education Nurse-led patient safety education

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-75 years
* Patients with RA ( ACR/EULAR criteria), axial or peripheral Spondyloarthritis (ASAS criteria), patients who are eligible for a Sub cutaneous biologic treatment according to the French recommendations of care
* patients naïve from biologics.
* Patients benefiting from French Social Security insurance.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable to speak or read French language,
* Patients unable to complete a questionnaire or meet with the trial obligations
* Patients suffering from severe cognitive or psychiatric dysfunction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catherine BEAUVAIS, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Rhumatologie Hôpital Saint Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Beauvais C, Fayet F, Rousseau A, Sordet C, Pouplin S, Maugars Y, Poilverd RM, Savel C, Segard V, Godon B, L'amour C, Perdriger A, Brin F, Peyrard P, Chalier F, Pallot-Prades B, Tuffet S, Griffoul I, Gossec L. Efficacy of a nurse-led patient education intervention in promoting safety skills of patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with biologics: a multicentre randomised clinical trial. RMD Open. 2022 Mar;8(1):e001828. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001828.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35296528 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K151201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Patient Education and Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT07170371 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA