Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
128 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-08-31
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
When mothers are identified as being at risk of going into preterm birth (giving birth within the next 14 days) there are several treatments available that may help reduce the likelihood of complications for the baby. These treatments usually need to be started within 24 hours so it is very important that diagnosing preterm labour in not only fast but accurate.
There are several methods commonly used within hospitals for diagnosing mothers who may be at risk of going into preterm labour. The two most common ones are foetal fibronectin (fFN) and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (phIGFBP-1).
The purpose of this study is to compare the two tests to see which is more accurate at predicting preterm birth.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Generic Database of Moderate Preterm Infants
NCT01793116
OPTI-Prem: Optimising Neonatal Service Provision for Preterm Babies Born Between 27 and 31 Weeks of Gestation in England
NCT02994849
Mobile Strategy to Reduce the Risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth
NCT04663607
A Novel Technique for Prediction of Preterm Birth: Fetal Breathing Patterns
NCT03655379
Cardiovascular Health Assessment of Preterm- and TERm-born Children
NCT05698836
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When mothers are identified as being at risk of going into preterm birth (giving birth within the next 14 days) there are several treatments available that may help reduce the likelihood of complications for the baby. These treatments usually need to be started within 24 hours so it is very important that diagnosing preterm labour in not only fast but accurate.
There are several methods commonly used within hospitals for diagnosing mothers who may be at risk of going into preterm labour. The two most common ones are foetal fibronectin (fFN) and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (phIGFBP-1).
The purpose of this study is to compare the two tests to see which is more accurate at predicting preterm birth.
This is a prospective comparative study of fFN (control) and PhIGFBP-1 test (comparator) for women with singleton pregnancies between 22-34 weeks gestation presenting with self-reported signs, symptoms or complaints suggestive of preterm labour.
Both tests will be done on every participant - the tests will be sequenced so that every 5 participants the fFN test is undertaken first and then the next cohort of 5 will have the PhIGFBP-1 swab taken first. This is to remove any potential biases surrounding which test was undertaken first. Data collection (case report forms (CRFs)) will clearly document which test was performed 1st and 2nd.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* confirmed pregnancy
* gestational age between 22 and 34 weeks
* self-reported signs, symptoms or complaints suggestive of preterm labour;
* abdominal pain
* contractions
* pelvic pressure
Exclusion Criteria
* multiple pregnancy
* participating in an interventional clinical trial
* a symptom not associated with idiopathic threatened preterm delivery (e.g. trauma)
* contraindicated to either fFN or PhIGFBP-1; e.g.
* vaginal bleeding
* cervical dilation ≥3cm dilated
* evidence of rupture of membranes
* had intercourse in last 24 hours
* cervical cerclage in situ
* placenta praevia
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amaju Ikomi, MBBS FRCOG
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS FT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Basildon Hospital
Basildon, Essex, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
194502
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
B868
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.