Early Palliative Care in Patients With Metastatic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated With First-line Chemotherapy
NCT ID: NCT02853474
Last Updated: 2023-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
480 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-31
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adjuvant Capecitabine vs Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT03079427
Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy or Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Nonmetastatic Biliary Tract Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
NCT00304135
Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Before Surgery in Patients With High-Risk Liver Bile Duct Cancer
NCT03579771
Gemcitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT00075452
Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin With or Without Bintrafusp Alfa (M7824) in Participants With 1L BTC
NCT04066491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Decades ago, PC services were initiated in France in order to provide a medical alternative to the use of questionable medical practices regarding the end of life period: abandonment, euthanasia, and inappropriate aggressive therapy. According to the French society of palliative care, PC is an approach aimed to provide active care, in a holistic approach, to the person with a serious, progressive or terminal illness. The objective of PC is to relieve pain and other distressing symptoms, but also to take into account the psychological, social and spiritual suffering. PC offers an interdisciplinary support system to help patients and their relatives. As mentioned previously, PC has been in France (but also in the US) usually offered late, at end-life stage. Actually, PC access became a Right guaranteed by the Law, for patients and their families in 1999. This context should explain why even nowadays, PC often means " end of life " not only for the lay-man for the general public but also for caregivers, and some doctors.
The last World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations are far less restrictive than the 1996 French recommendations, as it is stated that PC should be offered as earlier as possible in the course of the disease, in order to increase quality of life, and to positively influence the course of illness. The World Health Organization recommendations add that PC is applicable early in the course of illness, in conjunction with other therapies that are intended to prolong life, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and includes those investigations needed to better understand and manage distressing clinical complications.
In a recent randomized study, 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either early PC (EPC) combined with standard oncologic care or standard oncologic care alone. It was hypothesized that patients, who received EPC, compared with patients who received standard oncologic care only, would have a better quality of life (primary endpoint). The first visit with the PC service set up within the first 12 weeks, and the median number of visits in the EPC group was 4. In this study, the authors referred to the recommendations of the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, EPC led to significant improvements in quality of life. In addition, EPC led to significant improvements in mood, as well as in overall survival (median survival, 11.6 vs. 8.9 months; HR=0.60, p = 0.02)), despite less aggressive end-of-life care.
Following the publication of this American study, the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends nowadays that "combined standard oncology care and PC should be considered earlier in the course of the illness for any patient with metastatic cancer….". However, it is clear that a gap exists (not only in France) between this recommendation and the current practice. In addition, there is no consensus on how early PC should be integrated in oncologic services, even though an underpowered small randomized trial reported recently an insignificant better survival favoring early versus delayed (3 months later) initiation of PC.
The results of the study described above, although formally restricted to the field of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers, have modified the perception of many oncologists about the objectives of PC. However, additional clinical studies should be done before considering EPC as an additional survival input in other advanced malignancies.
The median survival of metastatic upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers such as pancreatic cancers, gastric cancers, and biliary tract cancers did not exceed 10-11 months, which is as poor as reported with metastatic lung cancers. Standard of care in the metastatic setting in upper GI cancers are described in ad hoc French guidelines, i.e.: "Thésaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive". Briefly, standard of care in metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting lies on the combination of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX regimen) for patients without any cholestasis and in good performance status, and on gemcitabine monotherapy. In metastatic biliary tract cancers, standard of care lies on gemcitabine-based regimen (gemcitabine monotherapy, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, or gemcitabine plus fluorouracil). Besides HER2 positive metastatic gastric/gastrooesophageal patients who present with much better prognosis, and should be treated with trastuzumab-based regimen, most of patients with metastatic gastric/gastrooesophageal HER2 negative patients (IHC + or IHC ++ with negative fish/sish) have poor prognosis, with similar survival rates than patients with other upper GI malignancies. In that setting, several regimens may be offered to patients, such as the following: Folfox, EOX/ECX, Folfiri, LV5FU2-cisplatin, Capecitabine-platinum salt or docetaxel-based regimen ...). Several experimental treatments (antiangiogenics, met inhibitors, modulators of immune check points, etc...) are currently tested in metastatic gastric/gastrooesophageal cancers, but these treatments are restricted to patients in good health condition who accept to participate to clinical trials, and none of these trials have yet produced meaningful survival benefit in the first-line setting.
To summarize, therapeutic advances in the setting of metastatic upper GI cancers are infrequent, and often modest. Providing an extra survival benefit for these patients with EPC, may contribute to deeply modify the practice of care of oncology in France.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A: Chemotherapy (CT) alone
The medical oncologists (or gastro enterologist physician) are in charge of the patient for CT administration, and for the management of symptoms related to the disease and/or the treatment, in accordance with professional practices. If needed (any time), a PC (Palliative consultation) visit could be performed.
Interventions are :
* EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life
* HADS score for anxiety and depression assessment
EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire
The Quality of Life is assessed with the QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion, as well as every 8 weeks thereafter.
HADS score
The depression is assessed with the HADS scale (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at baseline, and then 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion.
Arm B: CT + Early Palliative care(EPC)
Standard oncology care as for arm A plus early PC visits.
Interventions are :
* EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life
* HADS score for anxiety and depression assessment
* Early palliative care visits
Early Palliative Care visit
A PC visit is a visit done by a PC physician. Any kind of visits done by other professionals IS NOT a PC visit.
Five PC visits are scheduled in this arm.
EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire
The Quality of Life is assessed with the QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion, as well as every 8 weeks thereafter.
HADS score
The depression is assessed with the HADS scale (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at baseline, and then 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early Palliative Care visit
A PC visit is a visit done by a PC physician. Any kind of visits done by other professionals IS NOT a PC visit.
Five PC visits are scheduled in this arm.
EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire
The Quality of Life is assessed with the QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion, as well as every 8 weeks thereafter.
HADS score
The depression is assessed with the HADS scale (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at baseline, and then 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
NB: gastrooesophageal junctional cancers with dysphagia and/or gastric/gastrooesophageal cancers with unknown or positive HER2 status are not eligible.
* Patients planed to be treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Life expectancy ≥ 1 month
* Performance status (OMS) ≤ 2
* Good understanding of French language
* Signed and dated informed consent
* Patients covered by government health insurance
Exclusion Criteria
* Junctional Siewert 1 gastrooesophageal cancer
* Gastric or junctional gastrooesophageal cancer with dysphagia (Atkinson\>2)
* Gastric or junctional gastrooesophageal cancer with unknown or positive HER2 status (IHC: +++ or IHC ++ and FISH/SISH +)
* Compression of the biliary tract requiring a bypass
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ligue contre le cancer, France
OTHER
Région Nord-Pas de Calais, France
OTHER
National Cancer Institute, France
OTHER_GOV
Centre Oscar Lambret
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arlette Da Silva, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Oscar Lambret
Antoine Adenis, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Oscar Lambret
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest-site PAUL
Angers, , France
CH de Béthune
Beuvry, , France
Centre Hospitalier Boulogne sur Mer
Boulogne-sur-Mer, , France
Centre François Baclesse, Caen
Caen, , France
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc de DIJON
Dijon, , France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, , France
Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
Lille, , France
CHRU, Hôpital Claude HURIEZ
Lille, , France
Centre Léon Bérard de LYON
Lyon, , France
Institut Paoli-Calmettes de MARSEILLE
Marseille, , France
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy
Nancy, , France
Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes
Nantes, , France
Centre Antoine LACASSAGNE DE NICE
Nice, , France
Institut Curie, site de Saint Cloud, Hopital
Saint-Cloud, , France
CHU de Nantes, CHU - hôpital Nord Laennec,
Saint-Herblain, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de STRASBOURG
Strasbourg, , France
Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Tourcoing
Tourcoing, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adenis A, Da Silva A, Ben Abdelghani M, Bourgeois V, Bogart E, Turpin A, Evin A, Proux A, Galais MP, Jaraudias C, Quintin J, Bouquet G, Samalin E, Bremaud N, Javed S, Henry A, Kurtz JE, Cornuault-Foubert D, Vandamme H, Lucchi E, Pannier D, Belletier C, Paul M, Touzet L, Penel N, Chvetzoff G, Le Deley MC. Early palliative care and overall survival in patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers (EPIC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jun 28;74:102470. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102470. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Hutt E, Da Silva A, Bogart E, Le Lay-Diomande S, Pannier D, Delaine-Clisant S, Le Deley MC, Adenis A. Impact of early palliative care on overall survival of patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers treated with first-line chemotherapy: a randomised phase III trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e015904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015904.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-A01943-46
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EPIC-1511
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.