Study Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Driven Pathogenic Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections
NCT ID: NCT02852070
Last Updated: 2017-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2018-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Assessment of the safety of two common-used volume bronchoalveolar lavages(60ml and 120ml), including the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia within 14 days after bronchoscopy, and other bronchoalveolar lavage related adverse events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Segmental Bronchoalveolar Lavage
NCT00001618
Predictors for Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Recovery Rate Derived From Quantified Computed Tomography (qCT)
NCT03388580
Bronchoscopy Assisted Sampling of Cells and Fluid From the Lower Respiratory Tract of Human Subjects
NCT00840723
Exhaled Breath Condensate (EBC) Assessment in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT00448500
Collection of Lung Fluid and Tissue Samples for Research
NCT00471250
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The correct operation of bronchoalveolar lavage and normalization of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is a prerequisite for the exact results of the pathogen of BALF.
American Thoracic Society recommended amount of 100-300ml of saline solution was instilled into the distal bronchial tree in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. But there is no standard of lavage fluid volume in the etiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections, ranging from 60ml to 250ml ever reported in literature.
Less lavage volume would be more safer in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The investigators hypothesize that microbiological yield would be no significant difference in patients with low volume (60ml) compared with large volume (120ml).
The purpose of this study is to explore a more effective and safer way of bronchoalveolar lavage in lower respiratory tract infection patients, and determine the pathogenic distribution among them.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
Bronchoscopy examination with 120ml sterile saline solution for bronchoalveolar lavage
bronchoalveolar lavage 120ml
120mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times
observation group
Bronchoscopy examination with 60ml sterile saline solution for bronchoalveolar lavage
bronchoalveolar lavage 60ml
60mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bronchoalveolar lavage 120ml
120mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times
bronchoalveolar lavage 60ml
60mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Indication for bronchoalveolar lavage.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Contraindication of bronchoscopy: Severe heart or pulmonary dysfunction Recent occurrence of myocardial infarction unstable angina pectoris Severe coagulation disorders (DIC), Massive hemoptysis Gastrointestinal bleeding Thrombocytopenia (\<50\*109/L) Severe superior vena cava obstruction syndrome Aortic aneurysm Multiple pulmonary bulla Extreme exhaustion
3. Diagnosed or highly suspected of tuberculosis infection
4. Researchers think that can not be entered into the group.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Capital Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bin Cao
Clinical professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cao Bin, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCT02852070
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.