Study Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Driven Pathogenic Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

NCT ID: NCT02852070

Last Updated: 2017-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of microbiological yield from Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) for the two common-used volume bronchoalveolar lavages(60ml and 120ml)in patients with different types of lower respiratory tract infection.

Assessment of the safety of two common-used volume bronchoalveolar lavages(60ml and 120ml), including the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia within 14 days after bronchoscopy, and other bronchoalveolar lavage related adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The morbidity and mortality of lower respiratory tract infection gradually increased in recent years, but the etiological diagnosis rate is still low. Quickly identifying the pathogenic bacteria and the corresponding antimicrobial therapy treatment is particularly important. Fibrotic bronchoscopy combined with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has become a routine diagnostic tool for pulmonary infections in immunocompromised patients.

The correct operation of bronchoalveolar lavage and normalization of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is a prerequisite for the exact results of the pathogen of BALF.

American Thoracic Society recommended amount of 100-300ml of saline solution was instilled into the distal bronchial tree in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. But there is no standard of lavage fluid volume in the etiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections, ranging from 60ml to 250ml ever reported in literature.

Less lavage volume would be more safer in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The investigators hypothesize that microbiological yield would be no significant difference in patients with low volume (60ml) compared with large volume (120ml).

The purpose of this study is to explore a more effective and safer way of bronchoalveolar lavage in lower respiratory tract infection patients, and determine the pathogenic distribution among them.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

Bronchoscopy examination with 120ml sterile saline solution for bronchoalveolar lavage

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bronchoalveolar lavage 120ml

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

120mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times

observation group

Bronchoscopy examination with 60ml sterile saline solution for bronchoalveolar lavage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bronchoalveolar lavage 60ml

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

60mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bronchoalveolar lavage 120ml

120mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bronchoalveolar lavage 60ml

60mL sterile saline solution instilled into the distal bronchial tree in 3 times

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of lower respiratory infection
2. Indication for bronchoalveolar lavage.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Noninfectious pulmonary infiltration
2. Contraindication of bronchoscopy: Severe heart or pulmonary dysfunction Recent occurrence of myocardial infarction unstable angina pectoris Severe coagulation disorders (DIC), Massive hemoptysis Gastrointestinal bleeding Thrombocytopenia (\<50\*109/L) Severe superior vena cava obstruction syndrome Aortic aneurysm Multiple pulmonary bulla Extreme exhaustion
3. Diagnosed or highly suspected of tuberculosis infection
4. Researchers think that can not be entered into the group.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Capital Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bin Cao

Clinical professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cao Bin, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cao Bin, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-010-84206264

Li lijuan, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-010-84206264

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bin Cao, MD

Role: primary

86-010-84206264

Li lijuan, MD

Role: backup

86-010-84206264

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCT02852070

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.