Surgical Optimizing of a Middle Ear Implant (MET )With Laser Velocimetry in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss in Case of Failure of Conventional Equipment
NCT ID: NCT02845115
Last Updated: 2017-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Middle ear implants were developed to answer these problems. They are intended to amplify the sound signal by transmitting directly to the middle ear to compensate for the hearing loss and are indicated in case of failure or contraindication of conventional equipment. However, these middle ear implants currently have limitations as performance failure. Recent data show that the performance of the ossicles repair techniques are dependent on the coupling of the ossicular prosthesis to the ossicles. Furthermore, advances in the understanding of the biomechanics of the ossicles confirm the importance of the placement and linkage of surgical restoration processes. This data can be applied to middle ear implants to improve performance. Indeed, a preliminary experimental study on anatomical parts, using analysis of the vibration of the middle ear structures by laser velocimetry, allowed the investigators to define the transducer placement method and coupling method to ossicles.
Investigators wish to validate in vivo results in a pilot study on a small number of patients by comparing two surgical techniques guided by velocimetric measures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Middle Ear Implantation
NCT00451503
Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly
NCT05992779
Pitch and Loudness Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners: Psychophysics and Objective Measures
NCT01284790
Impact of Microphone Positioning on Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users
NCT04677517
Middle Ear Implant: Assessment of Satisfaction in the Medium Term
NCT04175275
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control
standard care : usual technique for implanting
Conventional implantation
Usual implantation technique of a middle ear implant. The principle of the ossicular stimulator middle ear transducer MET 7000 (Middle Ear Transducer, METTM) is to directly transmit sounds on the ossicles bypassing the outer ear. Their constraint is the surgical placement of the implant.
MET 7000 system (OTOLOGICS LLC, USA) is the implant that the investigators will use for their patients. The stimulator is usually placed against the body of the anvil by simple contact in the case of sensorineural hearing loss. In the case of mixed hearing loss, the stimulator will come in contact with the bracket using a titanium clip (ossicular prosthesis used in otologic surgery for ossiculoplasties). The optimized version corresponds to the use of the conventionally used in mixed deafness and applied to neurosensory deafness art. It is screwed onto the mastoid bone, the motor is suspended in the mastoid cavity and transmits vibrations to the body of the anvil by simple contact of the transducer.
laser velocimetry
optimized implantation of laser velocimetry
optimized implantation with laser velocimetry
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional implantation
Usual implantation technique of a middle ear implant. The principle of the ossicular stimulator middle ear transducer MET 7000 (Middle Ear Transducer, METTM) is to directly transmit sounds on the ossicles bypassing the outer ear. Their constraint is the surgical placement of the implant.
MET 7000 system (OTOLOGICS LLC, USA) is the implant that the investigators will use for their patients. The stimulator is usually placed against the body of the anvil by simple contact in the case of sensorineural hearing loss. In the case of mixed hearing loss, the stimulator will come in contact with the bracket using a titanium clip (ossicular prosthesis used in otologic surgery for ossiculoplasties). The optimized version corresponds to the use of the conventionally used in mixed deafness and applied to neurosensory deafness art. It is screwed onto the mastoid bone, the motor is suspended in the mastoid cavity and transmits vibrations to the body of the anvil by simple contact of the transducer.
optimized implantation with laser velocimetry
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having given written informed consent prior to any procedure related to the study;
* Covered by a Health System where applicable, and/or in compliance with the recommendations of the national laws in force relating to biomedical research.
* Indication and IOM implantation request by the patient with a patient physically, psychologically and legally able to ask its implementation
* Average deafness to severe (mean thresholds between 40 to 90 dB) with speech discrimination\> 40% to 75 dB.
* Deafness of pure perception or mixed hearing loss
* Non-fluctuating deafness over the last two years
* Failed or cons-indication to conventional equipment
* Rocky Scanner and MRI normal brain
* Patient fluent in French (to ensure validity audiological measures
Exclusion Criteria
* Not affiliated with a social security scheme Patients
* Major Patients protected by provisions of the law (Public Health Code).
* Refusal of consent.
* Ongoing Participation in another study that may interfere with the proposed study (investigator assessment).
* Existence of a cons-indication for surgery or port of the implant
* Motivation only aesthetic, evaluated by the principal investigator.
* Inability of predictable medium-term monitoring.
* Acoustic neuroma, tumors and other evolutionary processes of the rock and the cerebellopontine angle.
* Pathology requiring follow-up MRI (IOM against-indicating MRI).
* Patient with against-indication to MRI.
* Contraindication to the establishment of a pacemaker ossicular MET
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011.679
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.