The Role of Intravenous Albumin Replacement During Abdominal Paracentesis in Patients With Malignancy Related Ascites
NCT ID: NCT02811406
Last Updated: 2016-06-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methodology: Patients with symptomatic ascites secondary to underlying malignancy admitted to medical oncology inpatient service who require abdominal paracentesis will be enrolled. Patients with known portal hypertension based on SAAG (\>11.1 mmol/L) will be excluded. Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to two groups. During drainage of ascites fluid, one group will receive intravenous albumin infusion (50 ml/Litre of ascitic fluid drained), whereas the other group will not receive intravenous albumin infusion. Baseline parameters along with routine 4 hourly monitoring of blood pressure will be done. Episodes of hypotension (fall in SBP \> 20 mmHg) will be compared between these two groups and significance tested using the chi-square test.
Clinical significance: Ascites often occurs in the setting of advanced malignancy and drainage of ascites has been proven to provide symptomatic relief in this patient population with relatively short life expectancy. The use of intravenous albumin infusion is loosely extrapolated from studies in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing abdominal paracentesis. To date, there have been no standard guidelines to guide practice and no studies looking at the use of intravenous albumin in this population. As the mechanisms of ascites are different in different malignancies, the indication of intravenous albumin is uncertain and perhaps unnecessary in this setting. We hope to understand more about the rates of hypotension during abdominal paracentesis in this population and to generate systematic data to guide clinical practice in this area.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Continuous Passive Paracentesis for Intra-abdominal Hypertension
NCT04322201
Albumin 4 gr/L vs 8 gr/L in the Prevention of Post-Paracentesis Circulatory Dysfunction
NCT00428506
Formation and Severity of Pressure Ulcers Associated With 4% Albumin vs. 0.9% Sodium Chloride
NCT00228657
Strong Albumin Solutions in Patients With Septic Shock
NCT05208242
Preoperative Ascites Drainage Versus Standard Care for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer
NCT02742428
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therapeutic paracentesis is the first line of treatment for patients with symptomatic malignant ascites. The practice of intravenous albumin infusion during abdominal paracentesis comes from evidence in patients with liver cirrhosis. A meta-analysis of seventeen randomised trials evaluating patients receiving albumin versus alternative treatment during large volume paracentesis found that albumin reduced the incidence of post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction, hyponatraemia and mortality (Bernardi M, 2012). The mechanisms of ascites in patients with cirrhosis are driven by portal hypertension. Portal hypertension brings about systemic vasodilation and hyperdynamic circulation that eventually contribute to functional and biochemical changes leading to ascites (Gines. P, 1997).
In contrast, cause of ascites in patients with malignancies is usually multi-factorial. It occurs commonly in several tumours including malignancies of ovary, breast, colon, lung, pancreas and liver. In each of these cancer types, the mechanisms leading to malignancy-related ascites may be different. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a major cause of malignancy-related ascites. Other causes include massive liver metastasis causing portal hypertension, chronic hypoalbuminaemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, chylous ascites from lymphoma and Budd-Chiari syndrome due to occlusion of hepatic veins (Runyon BA, 1988).
In patients with cancer, aside from those who develop ascites as a result of portal hypertension, the benefit of intravenous albumin infusion with large volume paracentesis is uncertain, if at all present. Locally, the current clinical practice is for infusion of intravenous albumin during abdominal paracentesis in patients with malignancy-related ascites regardless of cause. The drawbacks of such an approach include exposing patients to risk of anaphylaxis and increased financial costs (50 ml of 20% Albumin costs $42).
Granted that the potential harms of albumin infusion are rare, the burden of proof to show that an intervention works is held by those who introduce it. To date, there have been no studies specifically examining the role of intravenous albumin infusion in this population. In the setting of advanced cancer where life expectancy is limited, the most clinically relevant benefit of albumin infusion would be to reduce the rates of post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction. Through a pilot study, we hope to evaluate the effectiveness of IV albumin in reducing rates of hypotension, thereby guiding clinical practice in this area.
Rationale and justification for the Study:
Hypothesis: Intravenous albumin infusion during abdominal paracentesis does not prevent hypotension in patients with malignancy-related ascites without portal hypertension.
Rationale for the Study Purpose:
Three significant outcomes have been proven for the use of intravenous albumin in large volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis. These are prevention of hypotension, prevention of hyponatraemia and survival benefit. Ascites in the setting of patients with malignancy usually occurs in advanced stage, of which the most meaningful outcome would be that of prevention of hypotension. At present, the current clinical practice locally is extrapolated from studies in patients with cirrhosis, and some physicians would opt to administer IV albumin with every litre of ascitic fluid drained. We propose a study to compare the rates of hypotension in patients who received IV albumin and those who do not. In this study, we will randomise patients with a known history of cancer who are admitted for symptomatic ascites to two groups. Both groups of patients will undergo insertion of abdominal drain for symptomatic relief. Group 1 will receive intravenous albumin and Group 2 will not.
Rationale for Doses Selected:
In Group 1, 50 ml of 20% intravenous albumin will be given for every litre of ascitic fluid drained as this is the current local preparation and practice.
Rationale for Study Population:
Replacement of intravenous albumin has been established in patients with ascites drainage for patients with liver cirrhosis. It has not been shown to benefit patients with malignancy.
Rationale for Study Design:
There have been no previous studies in patients of this population. This is a prospective pilot randomised study in order to compare the rates of hypotension between the two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Receives IV albumin infusion
IV albumin 20% 50 mL for every 1L of ascitic fluid drained
Receives IV albumin infusion
IV albumin 20% 50 mL for every 1L of ascitic fluid drained. Blood pressure and heart rate are recorded every four hours in both groups in the first 48 hours.
If hypotension occurs (defined as fall in systolic blood pressure of \> 20 mmHg from baseline) during drainage, drain is clamped and the patient will be clinically evaluated for cause of hypotension. If no other causes of hypotension are found and patient remains asymptomatic, repeat blood pressure measurement in 30 minutes. If blood pressure maintains \> 90/50 mmHg after 30 minutes and patient is asymptomatic, continue drainage and patient stays in the study. If patient remains hypotensive (BP \< 90/50) or develops symptomatic hypotension, then the patient will be taken off study and the hypotension managed as clinically indicated.
Do not receive IV albumin infusion
No IV albumin infusion
Do not receive IV albumin infusion
No IV albumin infusion. Blood pressure and heart rate are recorded every four hours in both groups in the first 48 hours.
If hypotension occurs (defined as fall in systolic blood pressure of \> 20 mmHg from baseline) during drainage, drain is clamped and the patient will be clinically evaluated for cause of hypotension. If no other causes of hypotension are found and patient remains asymptomatic, repeat blood pressure measurement in 30 minutes. If blood pressure maintains \> 90/50 mmHg after 30 minutes and patient is asymptomatic, continue drainage and patient stays in the study. If patient remains hypotensive (BP \< 90/50) or develops symptomatic hypotension, then the patient will be taken off study and the hypotension managed as clinically indicated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Receives IV albumin infusion
IV albumin 20% 50 mL for every 1L of ascitic fluid drained. Blood pressure and heart rate are recorded every four hours in both groups in the first 48 hours.
If hypotension occurs (defined as fall in systolic blood pressure of \> 20 mmHg from baseline) during drainage, drain is clamped and the patient will be clinically evaluated for cause of hypotension. If no other causes of hypotension are found and patient remains asymptomatic, repeat blood pressure measurement in 30 minutes. If blood pressure maintains \> 90/50 mmHg after 30 minutes and patient is asymptomatic, continue drainage and patient stays in the study. If patient remains hypotensive (BP \< 90/50) or develops symptomatic hypotension, then the patient will be taken off study and the hypotension managed as clinically indicated.
Do not receive IV albumin infusion
No IV albumin infusion. Blood pressure and heart rate are recorded every four hours in both groups in the first 48 hours.
If hypotension occurs (defined as fall in systolic blood pressure of \> 20 mmHg from baseline) during drainage, drain is clamped and the patient will be clinically evaluated for cause of hypotension. If no other causes of hypotension are found and patient remains asymptomatic, repeat blood pressure measurement in 30 minutes. If blood pressure maintains \> 90/50 mmHg after 30 minutes and patient is asymptomatic, continue drainage and patient stays in the study. If patient remains hypotensive (BP \< 90/50) or develops symptomatic hypotension, then the patient will be taken off study and the hypotension managed as clinically indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Inpatients admitted to medical oncology service with symptomatic ascites and who are scheduled for abdominal paracentesis
* Known underlying malignancy
* Blood pressure before abdominal paracentesis more than 90/50 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a known history of hypotension when getting paracentesis
* Pregnant women
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University Hospital, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soo Chin Lee
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National University Hospital, Singapore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology. 2012 Apr;55(4):1172-81. doi: 10.1002/hep.24786.
Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, Simon JA, Melton CA, Ott BJ, Kamath PS. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology. 2004 Aug;40(2):484-8. doi: 10.1002/hep.20317.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/00326
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MC01/02/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.