Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT02790307

Last Updated: 2016-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) has been recognised as a safe and effective treatment for the management of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, acceptability and pilot efficacy of transcutaneous TNS using a novel device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this single centre pilot study, 48 patients with OAB (24 with neurogenic and 24 with idiopathic OAB) were randomized to use a self-applicating ambulatory skin-adhering device to transcutaneously stimulate the tibial nerve for 30 minutes, either once daily or once weekly, for 12-weeks. Changes in lower urinary tract (LUT) OAB symptoms and QoL were measured at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12 using standardized validated scoring instruments (ICIQ-OAB and ICIQ-LUTSqol) and a Global Response Assessment (GRA) at week 12. Weekly phone calls and a usage diary captured patient-reported experiences with the device and compliance.

The primary study outcomes were to assess safety and acceptability of the device. In addition, treatment response was assessed using the Global Response Assessment (GRA) at week-12, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder and LUTS-quality of life (ICIQ-OAB and ICIQ-LUTSqol) at baseline, week 4, 8 and 12. In the GRA patients were asked to assess their response to treatment using an ordinal scale of 0 to 3, referring to none, mild, moderate or marked improvement, respectively 1. Patients reporting moderate or marked improvement were considered to have responded to treatment 1. The ICIQ-OAB score is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses OAB symptom severity and bother whereas the ICIQ-LUTSqol score is a 20-item health related quality of life questionnaire. In both questionnaires, part A assesses symptom severity and part B reflects the accumulative bother to the patient. High scores suggests worse symptom profiles and negative impact on QoL, respectively.

Patients recorded use of the device in a customized compliance diary which also included entries for their experiences in using the device and any adverse effects. Additionally, weekly phone calls were made by a member of the research team to assess compliance.

Statistical analysis A feasibility sample size of 48 patients was adopted and no formal power calculation was performed as is the convention for pilot studies. All data were presented as means with SDs. Paired student t-tests were used to provide an estimate of within group responses between baseline and 12 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overactive Bladder Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Daily stimulation (30mins/day)

30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The Geko

Intervention Type DEVICE

transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)

Weekly stimulation (30mins/week)

30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The Geko

Intervention Type DEVICE

transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The Geko

transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient eligibility was based on meeting the criteria for an overactive bladder, defined by the International Continence Society with an average urinary frequency ≥ 8 voids per and ≥ 1 urgency episode (with or without incontinence) per 24 hours
Eligible Sex

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jalesh Panicker

Consultant Uro-Neurologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jalesh Panicker, FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20171677 (View on PubMed)

de Seze M, Raibaut P, Gallien P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Bonniaud V, Game X, Amarenco G. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treatment of the overactive bladder syndrome in multiple sclerosis: results of a multicenter prospective study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):306-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.20958. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21305588 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12/LO/1613

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.