Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation of Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT02790307
Last Updated: 2016-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TPTNS) in Maintaining OAB Symptoms Improvement.
NCT02377765
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Children With Overactive Bladder
NCT06765629
Peripheral Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
NCT01783392
A Trial of Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for OAB
NCT02511717
Does Bladder Training Improve the Efficacy of Nerve Stimulation in Women With Refractory Overactive Bladders
NCT02107820
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary study outcomes were to assess safety and acceptability of the device. In addition, treatment response was assessed using the Global Response Assessment (GRA) at week-12, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder and LUTS-quality of life (ICIQ-OAB and ICIQ-LUTSqol) at baseline, week 4, 8 and 12. In the GRA patients were asked to assess their response to treatment using an ordinal scale of 0 to 3, referring to none, mild, moderate or marked improvement, respectively 1. Patients reporting moderate or marked improvement were considered to have responded to treatment 1. The ICIQ-OAB score is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses OAB symptom severity and bother whereas the ICIQ-LUTSqol score is a 20-item health related quality of life questionnaire. In both questionnaires, part A assesses symptom severity and part B reflects the accumulative bother to the patient. High scores suggests worse symptom profiles and negative impact on QoL, respectively.
Patients recorded use of the device in a customized compliance diary which also included entries for their experiences in using the device and any adverse effects. Additionally, weekly phone calls were made by a member of the research team to assess compliance.
Statistical analysis A feasibility sample size of 48 patients was adopted and no formal power calculation was performed as is the convention for pilot studies. All data were presented as means with SDs. Paired student t-tests were used to provide an estimate of within group responses between baseline and 12 weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Daily stimulation (30mins/day)
30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device
The Geko
transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)
Weekly stimulation (30mins/week)
30 minutes daily for 12 weeks of Tibial nerve stimulation using the Geko device
The Geko
transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The Geko
transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (stick on patch)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jalesh Panicker
Consultant Uro-Neurologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jalesh Panicker, FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
de Seze M, Raibaut P, Gallien P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Bonniaud V, Game X, Amarenco G. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treatment of the overactive bladder syndrome in multiple sclerosis: results of a multicenter prospective study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):306-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.20958. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12/LO/1613
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.