Anticoagulants Comparative Benefit-risk Ratio in Real Life

NCT ID: NCT02785354

Last Updated: 2018-11-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

103101 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-01

Study Completion Date

2016-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is an analysis using the French national health insurance database, six months after the beginning of NOAC launch in the NVAF indication.

The aim is to compare the one-year, two-year and three-year benefit-risk (major bleeding, arterial thrombotic events, myocardial infarction (MI), death) between patients starting a NOAC and patients starting a VKA for NVAF in 2013

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NOAC

New oral anticoagulant groups

No interventions assigned to this group

VKA

VKA group

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with NVAF with a first reimbursed dispensation of Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or VKA in 2013, with no other identified indication for anticoagulation; Without any VKA or NOAC (Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or Eliquis®) reimbursed dispensation for the last 3 years before the first reimbursed dispensation of Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or VKA

Exclusion Criteria

None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boehringer Ingelheim

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Boehringer Ingelheim

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Boehringer Ingelheim

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

1160.263.1 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Multiple Locations, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Blin P, Dureau-Pournin C, Benichou J, Cottin Y, Mismetti P, Abouelfath A, Lassalle R, Droz C, Moore N. Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Feb;20(1):81-103. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00359-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31254174 (View on PubMed)

Blin P, Dureau-Pournin C, Cottin Y, Benichou J, Mismetti P, Abouelfath A, Lassalle R, Droz C, Moore N. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Standard or Reduced Dose Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;105(6):1439-1455. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1318. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30499605 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1160.263

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.