Genomics in Michigan Impacting Observation or Radiation

NCT ID: NCT02783950

Last Updated: 2024-09-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

356 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-17

Study Completion Date

2024-04-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the impact of Decipher test results on adjuvant treatment decisions of high-risk post-RP patients with undetectable post-op prostate specific antigen (PSA) compared to clinical factors alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective, randomized trial will compare the receipt of adjuvant therapy for high-risk radical prostatectomy (RP) patients who undergo Decipher testing to those who do not. 350 subjects from within the statewide Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) will be randomized to either a Genomic Classifier (Decipher) or Usual-Care-Based (UC) strategy for a period of three months. If enrolled during the Genomic Classifier period, both subjects and their treating physician will be provided Decipher results and CAPRA-S scores. In the UC periods, CAPRA-S scores but not Decipher results will be provided.

The enrollment goal, initially and throughout the study, was to enroll 350 evaluable patients. During the study, the target accrual goal was raised to 550 patients to allow more flexibility among sites to achieve the enrollment goal of 350 evaluable patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GC (Decipher) Arm

If enrolled during the Genomic Classifier (GC) period, both subjects and their treating physician will be provided GC (Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier from GenomeDx) and CAPRA-S scores following prostatectomy.

Group Type OTHER

Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier

Intervention Type OTHER

The Decipher test (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a genomic test that predicts high grade disease, the probability of metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality for men with prostate cancer.

Usual-Care-Based (UC) Arm

If enrolled during the UC period, only the CAPRA-S results will be provided.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier

The Decipher test (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a genomic test that predicts high grade disease, the probability of metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality for men with prostate cancer.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Decipher Post-Op

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy
* PSA \< 0.1 ng/ml at enrollment
* At least one of the following:

* pT3 (seminal vesicle invasion or extraprostatic extension), or
* Positive surgical margins
* Radical prostatectomy within one year of enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who have any of the following will not be eligible to participate:

* Have regional or distant metastatic disease
* Received any radiation or hormone therapy (neo-adjuvant, adjuvant, or salvage)
* Node positive
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

GenomeDx Biosciences Corp

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Todd Morgan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Michael Cher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wayne State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Michigan Hospital and Health Systems

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Urologic Consultants

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Urology Associates of Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Urological Clinic

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health Medical Group- Urology

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Urology Surgeons, PC

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Medical Center, PLLC

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Tri-City Urology

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Urology Associates, PC

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Institute of Urology-Town Center

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

IHA Urology at St. Joe's Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15485730 (View on PubMed)

Badani K, Thompson DJ, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Garrison J, Ghadessi M, Mitra AP, Wood PJ, Hornberger J. Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group. Oncotarget. 2013 Apr;4(4):600-9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.918.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23592338 (View on PubMed)

Buja, A., Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1989). Linear smoothers and additive models (with discussion). Annals of Statistics, 17, 453-555.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Badani KK, Thompson DJ, Brown G, Holmes D, Kella N, Albala D, Singh A, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Hornberger J. Effect of a genomic classifier test on clinical practice decisions for patients with high-risk prostate cancer after surgery. BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):419-29. doi: 10.1111/bju.12789. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24784420 (View on PubMed)

Campbell, Michael J., and Stephen J. Walters. How to Design, Analyse and Report Cluster Randomised Trials in Medicine and Health Related Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA, Mitra AP, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Bergstralh EJ, Kollmeyer T, Fink S, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Ballman KV, Triche TJ, Black PC, Karnes RJ, Klee G, Davicioni E, Jenkins RB. Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066855. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23826159 (View on PubMed)

Heo M, Leon AC. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations. Stat Med. 2005 Mar 30;24(6):911-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.1958.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15558576 (View on PubMed)

Karnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Mitra AP, Crisan A, Erho N, Vergara IA, Lam LL, Carlson R, Thompson DJ, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Triche TJ, Kollmeyer T, Ballman KV, Black PC, Klee GG, Jenkins RB. Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2047-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23770138 (View on PubMed)

Den RB, Feng FY, Showalter TN, Mishra MV, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Birbe RC, McCue PA, Ghadessi M, Yousefi K, Davicioni E, Knudsen KE, Dicker AP. Genomic prostate cancer classifier predicts biochemical failure and metastases in patients after postoperative radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):1038-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.052. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25035207 (View on PubMed)

Cooperberg MR, Davicioni E, Crisan A, Jenkins RB, Ghadessi M, Karnes RJ. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort. Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.039. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24998118 (View on PubMed)

Klein EA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z, Choeurng V, Buerki C, Stephenson AJ, Li J, Kattan MW, Magi-Galluzzi C, Davicioni E. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):778-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25466945 (View on PubMed)

Den RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ, Abdollah F, Choeurng V, Feng FY, Dicker AP, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Davicioni E, Karnes RJ. Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):944-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0026. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25667284 (View on PubMed)

Ross AE, Johnson MH, Yousefi K, Davicioni E, Netto GJ, Marchionni L, Fedor HL, Glavaris S, Choeurng V, Buerki C, Erho N, Lam LL, Humphreys EB, Faraj S, Bezerra SM, Han M, Partin AW, Trock BJ, Schaeffer EM. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.042. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26058959 (View on PubMed)

Yamoah K, Johnson MH, Choeurng V, Faisal FA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z, Ross AE, Alshalafa M, Den R, Lal P, Feldman M, Dicker AP, Klein EA, Davicioni E, Rebbeck TR, Schaeffer EM. Novel Biomarker Signature That May Predict Aggressive Disease in African American Men With Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2789-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8912. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26195723 (View on PubMed)

Lake S, Kammann E, Klar N, Betensky R. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2002 May 30;21(10):1337-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1121.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12185888 (View on PubMed)

Michalopoulos SN, Kella N, Payne R, Yohannes P, Singh A, Hettinger C, Yousefi K, Hornberger J; PRO-ACT Study Group. Influence of a genomic classifier on post-operative treatment decisions in high-risk prostate cancer patients: results from the PRO-ACT study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Aug;30(8):1547-56. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919908. Epub 2014 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24803160 (View on PubMed)

Nguyen PL, Shin H, Yousefi K, Thompson DJ, Hornberger J, Hyatt AS, Badani KK, Morgan TM, Feng FY. Impact of a Genomic Classifier of Metastatic Risk on Postprostatectomy Treatment Recommendations by Radiation Oncologists and Urologists. Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26142578 (View on PubMed)

Lobo JM, Dicker AP, Buerki C, Daviconi E, Karnes RJ, Jenkins RB, Patel N, Den RB, Showalter TN. Evaluating the clinical impact of a genomic classifier in prostate cancer using individualized decision analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(3):e0116866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116866. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25837660 (View on PubMed)

Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19167731 (View on PubMed)

Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17099194 (View on PubMed)

Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):869-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22627076 (View on PubMed)

Lewicki P, Jiang R, Singhal U, Daignault-Newton S, Ginsburg K, Borza T, Schipper M, Cher M, Morgan T, Stensland K; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. How Sticky Are Clinical Trial Interventions? Site-Level Clinical Trial Participation and Differential Post-Trial Use of a Genomic Test. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Sep 11:OP2500475. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00475. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40934443 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://musicurology.com/

Website for MUSIC

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CU 008

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HUM00110858

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UMCC 2016.020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ReIMAGINE Prostate Cancer Screening
NCT04063566 COMPLETED NA