Genomics in Michigan Impacting Observation or Radiation
NCT ID: NCT02783950
Last Updated: 2024-09-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
356 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-17
2024-04-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genomics in Michigan to AdJust Outcomes in Prostate canceR (G-MAJOR) for Men With Newly Diagnosed Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT04396808
Multi-site Decision Impact Study for Decipher
NCT02034825
Integrated Genomic Prostate Score With MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsies
NCT04541030
Trial of Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance With or Without MRI-Guided Management
NCT01838265
INSIDE: Identification of Genomic Screening Pathways in Cancer Patients With DNA Repair Alterations
NCT06334809
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The enrollment goal, initially and throughout the study, was to enroll 350 evaluable patients. During the study, the target accrual goal was raised to 550 patients to allow more flexibility among sites to achieve the enrollment goal of 350 evaluable patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GC (Decipher) Arm
If enrolled during the Genomic Classifier (GC) period, both subjects and their treating physician will be provided GC (Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier from GenomeDx) and CAPRA-S scores following prostatectomy.
Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier
The Decipher test (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a genomic test that predicts high grade disease, the probability of metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality for men with prostate cancer.
Usual-Care-Based (UC) Arm
If enrolled during the UC period, only the CAPRA-S results will be provided.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decipher Prostate Cancer Classifier
The Decipher test (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a genomic test that predicts high grade disease, the probability of metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality for men with prostate cancer.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PSA \< 0.1 ng/ml at enrollment
* At least one of the following:
* pT3 (seminal vesicle invasion or extraprostatic extension), or
* Positive surgical margins
* Radical prostatectomy within one year of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
* Have regional or distant metastatic disease
* Received any radiation or hormone therapy (neo-adjuvant, adjuvant, or salvage)
* Node positive
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC)
OTHER
GenomeDx Biosciences Corp
INDUSTRY
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Todd Morgan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Michael Cher, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wayne State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Michigan Hospital and Health Systems
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Urologic Consultants
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Urology Associates of Grand Rapids
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Michigan Urological Clinic
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Spectrum Health Medical Group- Urology
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Urology Surgeons, PC
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Comprehensive Medical Center, PLLC
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Tri-City Urology
Saginaw, Michigan, United States
Bay Area Urology Associates, PC
Traverse City, Michigan, United States
Michigan Institute of Urology-Town Center
Troy, Michigan, United States
IHA Urology at St. Joe's Ann Arbor
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.
Badani K, Thompson DJ, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Garrison J, Ghadessi M, Mitra AP, Wood PJ, Hornberger J. Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group. Oncotarget. 2013 Apr;4(4):600-9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.918.
Buja, A., Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1989). Linear smoothers and additive models (with discussion). Annals of Statistics, 17, 453-555.
Badani KK, Thompson DJ, Brown G, Holmes D, Kella N, Albala D, Singh A, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Hornberger J. Effect of a genomic classifier test on clinical practice decisions for patients with high-risk prostate cancer after surgery. BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):419-29. doi: 10.1111/bju.12789. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
Campbell, Michael J., and Stephen J. Walters. How to Design, Analyse and Report Cluster Randomised Trials in Medicine and Health Related Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA, Mitra AP, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Bergstralh EJ, Kollmeyer T, Fink S, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Ballman KV, Triche TJ, Black PC, Karnes RJ, Klee G, Davicioni E, Jenkins RB. Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066855. Print 2013.
Heo M, Leon AC. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations. Stat Med. 2005 Mar 30;24(6):911-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.1958.
Karnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Mitra AP, Crisan A, Erho N, Vergara IA, Lam LL, Carlson R, Thompson DJ, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Triche TJ, Kollmeyer T, Ballman KV, Black PC, Klee GG, Jenkins RB. Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2047-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
Den RB, Feng FY, Showalter TN, Mishra MV, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Birbe RC, McCue PA, Ghadessi M, Yousefi K, Davicioni E, Knudsen KE, Dicker AP. Genomic prostate cancer classifier predicts biochemical failure and metastases in patients after postoperative radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):1038-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.052. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
Cooperberg MR, Davicioni E, Crisan A, Jenkins RB, Ghadessi M, Karnes RJ. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort. Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.039. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
Klein EA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z, Choeurng V, Buerki C, Stephenson AJ, Li J, Kattan MW, Magi-Galluzzi C, Davicioni E. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):778-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
Den RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ, Abdollah F, Choeurng V, Feng FY, Dicker AP, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Davicioni E, Karnes RJ. Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):944-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0026. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
Ross AE, Johnson MH, Yousefi K, Davicioni E, Netto GJ, Marchionni L, Fedor HL, Glavaris S, Choeurng V, Buerki C, Erho N, Lam LL, Humphreys EB, Faraj S, Bezerra SM, Han M, Partin AW, Trock BJ, Schaeffer EM. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.042. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
Yamoah K, Johnson MH, Choeurng V, Faisal FA, Yousefi K, Haddad Z, Ross AE, Alshalafa M, Den R, Lal P, Feldman M, Dicker AP, Klein EA, Davicioni E, Rebbeck TR, Schaeffer EM. Novel Biomarker Signature That May Predict Aggressive Disease in African American Men With Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2789-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8912. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
Lake S, Kammann E, Klar N, Betensky R. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2002 May 30;21(10):1337-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1121.
Michalopoulos SN, Kella N, Payne R, Yohannes P, Singh A, Hettinger C, Yousefi K, Hornberger J; PRO-ACT Study Group. Influence of a genomic classifier on post-operative treatment decisions in high-risk prostate cancer patients: results from the PRO-ACT study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Aug;30(8):1547-56. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919908. Epub 2014 May 15.
Nguyen PL, Shin H, Yousefi K, Thompson DJ, Hornberger J, Hyatt AS, Badani KK, Morgan TM, Feng FY. Impact of a Genomic Classifier of Metastatic Risk on Postprostatectomy Treatment Recommendations by Radiation Oncologists and Urologists. Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.004.
Lobo JM, Dicker AP, Buerki C, Daviconi E, Karnes RJ, Jenkins RB, Patel N, Den RB, Showalter TN. Evaluating the clinical impact of a genomic classifier in prostate cancer using individualized decision analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(3):e0116866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116866. eCollection 2015.
Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):869-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22.
Lewicki P, Jiang R, Singhal U, Daignault-Newton S, Ginsburg K, Borza T, Schipper M, Cher M, Morgan T, Stensland K; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. How Sticky Are Clinical Trial Interventions? Site-Level Clinical Trial Participation and Differential Post-Trial Use of a Genomic Test. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Sep 11:OP2500475. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00475. Online ahead of print.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Website for MUSIC
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CU 008
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HUM00110858
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UMCC 2016.020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.