Bronchodilator's Effects on Exertional Dyspnoea in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT ID: NCT02782052
Last Updated: 2020-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2019-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Design: 5 visits; V1: screening, familiarization, incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET); V2: constant work-rate (CWR-CPET); V3, V4 and V5: CWR-CPET after intervention, in a random order: Placebo (P), Ipratropium Bromide (IB), Ipratropium Bromide + Salbutamol (IB+SALB).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Albuterol and Dynamic Hyperinflation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT02108743
Effect of Inhaled Albuterol in Pulmonary Hypertension
NCT03270332
Clinical Study of Pulsed, Inhaled Nitric Oxide Versus Placebo in Symptomatic Subjects With PAH
NCT02725372
A Phase 3 Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Treprostinil in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT03496623
Inhaled Aerosolized Prostacyclin for Pulmonary Hypertension Requiring Inhaled Nitric Oxide
NCT02170519
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this regard, our team has recently confirmed that small airway dysfunction at spirometry exists in the majority of PAH patients (60%) despite preserved FEV1/VC, and that this promotes the development of DH under the increased ventilatory demand in response to physical task: in fact, during the accelerated ventilatory response to exercise, 60% of PAH patients did increase their EELV (i.e., DH) by an average of 0.50L from rest to peak exercise, whereas age- and sex-matched healthy subjects did decrease it by an average of 0.45L. Similar levels of DH have been reported in healthy subjects between 40 and 80 years of age, patients with mild-to-severe COPD, CHF, and recently also in a heterogeneous group of patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension, but at much lower V'E and work-rate than in our more homogeneous group of PAH patients. Our team did also show that DH had serious sensory consequences for PAH patients. DH imposed severe mechanical constraints on VT expansion during exercise on a background of progressively increasing central neural drive: VT was truncated from below by the increasing EELV and constrained from above by the TLC envelope and the relatively reduced IRV. It is generally accepted that in this setting dyspnoea results from the conscious awareness of the increasing disparity between respiratory effort (or neural drive to breathe) and simultaneous thoracic volume displacement. The notion that DH and the subsequent constraint of VT expansion contributed to exertional dyspnoea was bolstered by the strong inverse correlation between dyspnoea intensity and both the increase dynamic EELV/TLC(%) (R=0.70, p\<0.05) and the reduced IRV/TLC(%) (R=-0.78, p\<0.05) at a standardized exercise stimulus.
Our team was able, for the first time, to clearly demonstrate that an abnormal mechanics of breathing (dynamic lung hyperinflation and the attendant constraint of VT expansion) played an important role in dyspnoea causation in PAH during cycle exercise. When increased ventilation/perfusion mismatching is superimposed on pre-existing abnormal airway function, greater troublesome exertional symptoms are the result. This finding opens up new horizons for research in the field of dyspnoea mechanisms in PAH: if investigator treats and ameliorates the "lung function" (i.e., the respiratory mechanics abnormalities"), then our team could be able to improve the troublesome exertional symptoms that curtail daily-living activities of PAH patients. The corollary of this is that any therapeutic intervention that effectively reduces and/or delays the rate of onset of DH-induced critical ventilatory constraints, such as administration of inhaled bronchodilators (BDs) as add-ons to vasodilators, should have a positive effect on symptom perception in selected patients with stable PAH. Determining the magnitude of this effect will be the object of the planned experiments. However, it should be borne in mind that the relationship between dyspnoea intensity and the severity of respiratory abnormalities is not linear, but rather exponential. In other words, when a given disease is already responsible for a very intense dyspnoea, a small additional deterioration directly or indirectly related to the disease can make dyspnoea intolerable. Therefore, even small BDs-induced changes in respiratory mechanics could have major effects on dyspnoea intensity on exertion in selected PAH patients, which would undoubtedly have a major impact on their quality of life and their ability to perform daily-living activities.
Hypothesis for the research What is the potential mechanism by which BDs would be able to ameliorate the exertional symptoms in patients with stable PAH, and, which BDs would be the best candidate in achieving that? Regardless of the BDs administered, our team anticipates that the potential mechanism by which BDs are able to ameliorate the exertional symptoms in patients with stable PAH would be the reduction and/or delay of the rate of onset of DH-induced critical ventilatory constraints during exercise. In contrast, the nature of the specific BD (β2-agonist or anticholinergic) would be important in determining the mechanism by which the reduction in DH-induced critical ventilatory constraints can be achieved. BDs have been extensively studied in COPD patients, and to less extent in CHF patients. Little is known in PAH patients. Spiekerkoetter and colleagues have recently pointed out that inhaled β2-agonists are able to cause a mild but significant increase in resting FEV1, FEF50% and FEF75% in PAH patients. They also showed that inhalation of β2-agonists determined a significant increase in resting cardiac output accompanied by an increase in stroke volume and a decrease in pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance, in the presence of no change in heart rate. To date, no information is available on the effects of inhaled β2-agonists on the ventilatory, mechanical and perceptual responses to exercise in PAH patients. It can be argued that β2-agonists may reduce and/or delay the rate of onset of DH-induced critical ventilatory constraints by 1) reducing the ventilatory demand in response to exercise, and/or by 2) modifying the shape and limits of the maximal flow-volume loop (MFVL). In the first case, the improved cardiac function and concurrent ventilation-perfusion relations following β2-agonists would reduce the ventilatory demand, thereby reducing the rate of DH and enhancing VT expansion during exercise. This, in turn, would be expected to reduce the perceived exertional dyspnoea, as clearly shown in patients with COPD following BDs. In the second case, β2-agonists would increase the maximal volume-corrected expiratory flow rates in the effort-independent mid-volume range where tidal breathing occurs (i.e., increase in FEF50% and FEF75%), as it has been shown in CHF. This means that PAH patients would now accomplish the required alveolar ventilation at a lower operating lung volume and, therefore, at a reduced oxygen cost of breathing during exercise. The corollary of this will be that PAH patients would increase their end-expiratory lung volume (i.e., DH) to less extent after inhalation of β2-agonist than before, and this is likely to have salutary sensory consequences (i.e., reduction in dyspnoea intensity) for patients with PAH, as clearly shown in patients with COPD. Inhaled anticholinergic agents have not yet been studied, neither at rest nor during exercise in PAH. Inhalation of anticholinergic agents would increase the maximal volume-corrected expiratory flow rates in the effort-independent mid-volume range where tidal breathing occurs, without interfering with the cardiac and pulmonary vascular functions, as it has been shown in patients with CHF. The attendant increase in FEF50% and FEF75% (where tidal breathing occurs) following inhaled anticholinergic agents would cause VT to be accommodated at a lower operating lung volume, thus reducing the extent of DH and the concurrent ventilatory constraints imposed by the accelerated ventilatory response to exercise. This, in turn, is likely to have salutary sensory consequences (i.e., reduction in dyspnoea intensity) for patients with PAH. The interest of our study in dyspnoea evaluation after BDs in PAH patients is, therefore, evident and appealing, for at least two reasons: 1) there is no information in the literature about the effect of pharmacological interventions on dyspnoea intensity (measured by Borg score) during cycle exercise in PAH population, and 2) investigators do not know how much will the dyspnoea intensity (measured by Borg score) change after BD administration in PAH population because no Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) has been established for measurements of dyspnoea intensity. Nonetheless, based on COPD studies, short-term post-intervention changes in dyspnoea intensity of \~1 Borg unit at a standardized exercise time or V'E appear to be clinically meaningful, therefore our team can assume that this MCID may also apply to PAH patients undergoing cycle exercise testing after BD interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nebulized ipratropium bromide
Administration in a random order nebulized ipratropium bromide at V3 or V4 or V5
Nebulized ipratropium bromide
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol
Administration in a random order combination Ipratropium bromide and Salbutamol at V3 or V4 or V5
Nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Placebo
Administration in a random order placebo at V3 or V4 or V5
Nebulized Placebo
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nebulized ipratropium bromide
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Nebulized Placebo
Administration at V3 or V4 or V5 in a random order:
* Placebo (P; sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution)
* Or nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB; 0.5mg/2mL) alone
* Or nebulized combination ipratropium bromide with salbutamol (IB+SALB; 0.5mg/2mL + 2.5mg/2.5mL).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. With signed informed consent;
3. Affiliated to social security system;
4. With idiopathic or heritable PAH , diagnosed according to the current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines;
5. Irrespective of the treatment received;
6. Clinically stable during the 3 preceding months and the entire duration of the project;
7. With CPET scheduled within the frame of their clinical follow-up at the reference center.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Past or current tobacco-smoking history;
3. A spirometric evidence of an obstructive ventilatory defect as defined by a reduced FEV1/VC ratio below the 5th percentile of the predicted value;
4. A FEF75% \>60% of predicted normal values at spirometry;
5. A TLC below the 5th percentile of the predicted value;
6. A body mass index \>30 kg.m-2;
7. Use of supplemental oxygen;
8. PAH induced by drugs and toxins;
9. PAH associated with other conditions, including connective tissue diseases, congenital heart diseases, portal hypertension, and HIV infection;
10. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension;
11. Other respiratory, cardiac and other diseases that could contribute to dyspnoea or exercise limitation;
12. Contraindications to clinical exercise testing, such as NYHA functional class IV, syncope and others;
13. Specific contraindications (precautions and drug interactions) to the administration of IB or IB+SALB.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-002590-10
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P130906
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.