Polyglactin 910 vs Poligelecaprone 25 Running Subcuticular Closure of Elliptical Excision Wounds
NCT ID: NCT02776618
Last Updated: 2017-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-15
2017-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
NCT02550574
Effect of Externally Implantable Tissue Expansion Device on Scar Length
NCT00798798
A Comparative Study of Scar Quality and Safety According to Suture Materials Following Excision of Benign Tumors
NCT05240820
Photochemical Tissue Bonding
NCT00586040
Absorbable Suture Versus Tissue Glue to Repair Defects Following Mohs Surgery
NCT01298167
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention:
Patients will undergo a medically-necessary elliptical excision of their cutaneous malignancy using standard excision protocol. This will occur in a similar time frame to a standard excision of cutaneous malignancy in our clinics ranging from 1-4 weeks from diagnosis, based on the patient's preference and schedule. The wound will be divided into halves designated as side A (either left or superior aspect) and side B (either right or inferior). Side A of the wound will be randomly assigned subcuticular closure with either poliglecaprone 25 or polyglactin 910. Side B will receive the opposite of side A. Randomization will be performed with online randomization software (https://www.randomizer.org). Prior to placement of the superficial subcuticular sutures, both sides of the wound will receive vertical deep sub-epidermal sutures using polyglactin 910. Patients will be blinded as to which material is used on which side. After the wound is closed, a de-identified photograph will be taken by the PI or co-investigators of the wound with demarcation of sites A and B (using a surgical pen) to serve as a marker for side A and side B for future identification of the intervention sites. The type of randomized intervention to site A and site B will be recorded without identifying patient information on a secure, encrypted database. Closed wounds will be treated with standard protocol with a pressure bandage left in place for 24 hours followed by daily treatment with petrolatum ointment and a bandage for 2 weeks until the epidermis has healed together completely. Patients will be counseled on standard wound care as well as common complications of standard excisions by the surgeon. No visit for suture removal will be necessary as all sutures are dissolvable.
\*note - interventional methods for patients included in the study are considered standard therapy. Patient's would still receive similar excision and closure of their wound if they were not participating in the research.
Follow-up:
Patients will be called via telephone by either the PI or co-investigators after 2 weeks to inquire about the healing process and assess for any complications.
Patients will then follow up at 6 months for their scheduled routine skin cancer surveillance exam with the surgeon who performed the excision. At that time, the surgeon will re-identify sites A and B with a surgical marking pen. A de-photograph will be taken of the excision site scar. At the end of the patient visit, the patient will personally given a POSAS patient survey and asked to rate their scar for both sites A and B; no identifying information will be included in this survey. In the case that the scar is in a location that the patient can not easily visualize, the de-identified photograph of the patient's scar will be printed for the patient to assess the scar. Photographs will then later be assigned to two blinded observers to assign a modified observer POSAS score to subjects' scars. These scores will be averaged and then analyzed for differences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Polyglactin 910
One half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with polyglactin 910 suture
running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.
poliglecaprone 25
One half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with poliglecaprone 25
running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Scott Worswick
Health Sciences Assistant Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Scott D Worswick, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univeristy of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
#15-001216
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.