Polyglactin 910 vs Poligelecaprone 25 Running Subcuticular Closure of Elliptical Excision Wounds

NCT ID: NCT02776618

Last Updated: 2017-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-15

Study Completion Date

2017-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We will be recruiting patients requiring excisions of skin cancer and comparing aesthetic and functional differences of suture repair of excisional defects using polyglactin 910 vs poliglecaprone 25 with a split-scar model. Excision sites will be on either the trunk or extremities. Standard dermatological excision and repair methods will be used for removal of lesions and repair of the wound by surgeons; training courses will be used to limit inter-surgeon variation in technique. Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by randomly assigned subcuticular closure of one half of the defect with polyglactin 910 sutures and the other half with poliglecaprone 25 sutures. The patient will follow-up at 6 months and fill out a patient self-assessment evaluation survey of the scar. Photographs will also be taken of the scars at the follow-up at 6 months, which will be then be assigned to a set of blinded observers to evaluate the wound using a modified Patient Observer Self-Assessment Scale (mPOSAS). These observers will rate each scar on the mPOSAS scale and values will be averaged between observers. Total duration of participation will be 6 months, with 2 total visits (excision visit and follow-up visit).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Screening: Patients will be recruited for the study after the need for excision of cutaneous malignancy has been been determined by biopsy. Patients who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria (please refer to section 11.1) will be offered to have an elliptical excision with repair by standard of care (surgeon's choice of closure of entire surgical wound) or be enrolled in the study. Patients will be recruited directly by the PI and/or co-investigators, typically on the telephone when biopsy results of cutaneous malignancy and the need for treatment by excision are being conveyed. Occasionally the patient's may be recruited directly in-person if a subsequent office-visit occurs between the patient and the physician. Patient's who enroll in the study will then undergo intervention with excision and repair at a time convenient to them, ideally within one month.

Intervention:

Patients will undergo a medically-necessary elliptical excision of their cutaneous malignancy using standard excision protocol. This will occur in a similar time frame to a standard excision of cutaneous malignancy in our clinics ranging from 1-4 weeks from diagnosis, based on the patient's preference and schedule. The wound will be divided into halves designated as side A (either left or superior aspect) and side B (either right or inferior). Side A of the wound will be randomly assigned subcuticular closure with either poliglecaprone 25 or polyglactin 910. Side B will receive the opposite of side A. Randomization will be performed with online randomization software (https://www.randomizer.org). Prior to placement of the superficial subcuticular sutures, both sides of the wound will receive vertical deep sub-epidermal sutures using polyglactin 910. Patients will be blinded as to which material is used on which side. After the wound is closed, a de-identified photograph will be taken by the PI or co-investigators of the wound with demarcation of sites A and B (using a surgical pen) to serve as a marker for side A and side B for future identification of the intervention sites. The type of randomized intervention to site A and site B will be recorded without identifying patient information on a secure, encrypted database. Closed wounds will be treated with standard protocol with a pressure bandage left in place for 24 hours followed by daily treatment with petrolatum ointment and a bandage for 2 weeks until the epidermis has healed together completely. Patients will be counseled on standard wound care as well as common complications of standard excisions by the surgeon. No visit for suture removal will be necessary as all sutures are dissolvable.

\*note - interventional methods for patients included in the study are considered standard therapy. Patient's would still receive similar excision and closure of their wound if they were not participating in the research.

Follow-up:

Patients will be called via telephone by either the PI or co-investigators after 2 weeks to inquire about the healing process and assess for any complications.

Patients will then follow up at 6 months for their scheduled routine skin cancer surveillance exam with the surgeon who performed the excision. At that time, the surgeon will re-identify sites A and B with a surgical marking pen. A de-photograph will be taken of the excision site scar. At the end of the patient visit, the patient will personally given a POSAS patient survey and asked to rate their scar for both sites A and B; no identifying information will be included in this survey. In the case that the scar is in a location that the patient can not easily visualize, the de-identified photograph of the patient's scar will be printed for the patient to assess the scar. Photographs will then later be assigned to two blinded observers to assign a modified observer POSAS score to subjects' scars. These scores will be averaged and then analyzed for differences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cosmetics, Suture, Cicatrix

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Polyglactin 910

One half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with polyglactin 910 suture

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

running subcuticular closure of excisional defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.

poliglecaprone 25

One half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with poliglecaprone 25

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

running subcuticular closure of excisional defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

running subcuticular closure of excisional defect

Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older requiring excision of either cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma with postoperative defects of at least 4 cm on the trunk and extremities resulting from simple excisional defects. Participants will be patients of the dermatology departments of either the University of California, Los Angeles

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy, incarceration, mental impairment, inability to understand English, nonlinear closures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Scott Worswick

Health Sciences Assistant Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott D Worswick, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univeristy of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#15-001216

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of YAP1-inhibition in Surgical Wounds.
NCT06944249 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2