Exercise Capacity Study of LCZ696 vs. Enalapril in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.
NCT ID: NCT02768298
Last Updated: 2021-10-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
201 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-12
2019-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
NCT01035255
A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study Comparing LCZ696 to Medical Therapy for Comorbidities in HFpEF Patients
NCT03066804
Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
NCT02468232
randOmized stUdy Using acceleromeTry to Compare Sacubitril/valsarTan and Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT02900378
Study of Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Mild to Moderate HF With Reduced Ejection Fraction
NCT02874794
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study consisted of a screening period of 2 weeks during which the subject's eligibility for the study was assessed followed by a double blind treatment period of 12 weeks. Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either LCZ696 or enalapril during the double-blind period. Treatment was initiated with LCZ696 100 mg bid or enalapril 5 mg bid (enalapril 10 mg bid for patients at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day or corresponding doses of other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) prior first screening visit), respectively. Dose was up-titrated after 2 weeks to the final dose of LCZ696 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid.
Patients continued to take their background medications for chronic heart failure during the study, with the exception of ACEI or ARBs which were replaced by investigational treatment and had to be discontinued before first dose of study drug.
The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of LCZ696 200 mg bid compared to enalapril 10 mg bid in improving exercise tolerance (peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak), adjusted to body weight) as assessed by cardio-pulmonary-exercise testing (CPET) in patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA III) and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) after 3 months treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LCZ696
LCZ696 100 mg oral twice daily (bid) for 2 weeks followed by LCZ696 200 mg oral bid for 10 weeks.
LCZ696
LCZ696 100 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by LCZ696 200 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets.
Placebo matching enalapril
Patients randomized to LCZ696 arm also received placebo matching enalapril (enalapril 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.
Enalapril
Enalapril 5 mg oral twice daily (bid) for 2 weeks followed by enalapril 10 mg oral bid for 10 weeks.
Patients who prior Screening were at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day (or corresponding doses of other ACEI/ARB) started the study at a dose of enalapril 10 mg bid.
Enalapril
Enalapril 5 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by enalapril 10 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets.
Patients who prior Screening were at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day (or corresponding doses of other ACEI/ARB) started the study at a dose of enalapril 10 mg bid.
Placebo matching LCZ696
Patients randomized to enalapril arm also received placebo matching LCZ696 (LCZ696 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LCZ696
LCZ696 100 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by LCZ696 200 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets.
Enalapril
Enalapril 5 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by enalapril 10 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets.
Patients who prior Screening were at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day (or corresponding doses of other ACEI/ARB) started the study at a dose of enalapril 10 mg bid.
Placebo matching enalapril
Patients randomized to LCZ696 arm also received placebo matching enalapril (enalapril 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.
Placebo matching LCZ696
Patients randomized to enalapril arm also received placebo matching LCZ696 (LCZ696 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reduced ability to exercise, evidenced by VO2peak ≤ 18 ml/min per kg
* Patients had to be on an ACEI or an ARB at a stable dose of at least enalapril 10 mg/d or equivalent for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit and until randomization visit.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous history of intolerance to recommended target doses of ACEIs or ARBs
* Known history of angioedema
* Requirement of treatment with both ACEIs and ARBs
* Current acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF manifested by signs and symptoms that may require intravenous therapy)
* Symptomatic hypotension
* Impaired renal function
* Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Erfurt, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Koblenz, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Koeln-Nippes, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Leverkusen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ludwigsburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ludwigshafen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
München, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Neuwied, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Nienburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Rotenburg an der Fulda, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Rüdersdorf, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Siegen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Worms, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuppertal, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Würzburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novartisclinicaltrials.com
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-004632-35
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CLCZ696BDE01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.