Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
NCT ID: NCT02468232
Last Updated: 2023-12-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-15
2021-02-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The core part of this study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active-controlled study to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. and enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. on CV mortality and morbidity reduction in Japanese HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Patients who met the eligibility criteria at screening entered a 2 week, single-blind, active treatment run-in epoch in which they received LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. Patients who tolerated LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks during the double-blind treatment epoch. The patient randomization was stratified by using NT-proBNP measured at the screening visit as a stratification factor. The patients were then titrated up to the target dose of LCZ696 200 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. if they tolerated 4 weeks treatment of LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. Dose adjustment (LCZ696 50-100 mg b.i.d. \& enalapril 2.5-5 mg b.i.d.) was permitted if not tolerated at the target dose of study drugs during the double-blind treatment epoch.
This was an event-driven study in which subjects remained on the study (regardless of whether receiving investigational medications) until the projected number of patients with primary events (approximately 57 events) had been reached.
The Open label extension (OLE) epoch was conducted following the completion of the core part, with the aim to provide access to LCZ696 for eligible subjects until the marketed product was available in Japan or 2 years from the date of the first subject enrolled in the OLE epoch, whichever occurred first, and also to obtain the safety and tolerability data of long-term treatment with LCZ696.
Upon completion of the core part, the eligibility of the subjects to enter the OLE epoch was assessed by the investigator at OLE baseline (Visit 301), which occurred on the same day as the end of study (EOS) visit of the core part (Visit 299). At this visit, subjects were switched to open-label LCZ696.
At Visit 302 (2 to 4 weeks after Visit 301), subjects who tolerated the open-label LCZ696 and met the safety monitoring criteria were up-titrated to the next higher level of daily dose. Thereafter, subject visits occurred at 8 weeks, and then every 4 months until EOS visit for OLE epoch.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LCZ696
Before randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind epoch, randomized patients in this arm started with 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 200 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 100 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.
LCZ696
The target dose during the study was LCZ696 200 mg bid given orally. LCZ696 was supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets.
Placebo to Enalapril
Enalapril Placebo 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg tablets
Enalapril
Before randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind period, all randomized patients in this arm received enalapril 5mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 10 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 5 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.
Enalapril
The target dose during the study was enalapril 10 mg bid given orally. Enalapril was provided as 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets.
Placebo to LCZ696
LCZ696 Placebo 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LCZ696
The target dose during the study was LCZ696 200 mg bid given orally. LCZ696 was supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets.
Enalapril
The target dose during the study was enalapril 10 mg bid given orally. Enalapril was provided as 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets.
Placebo to LCZ696
LCZ696 Placebo 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets
Placebo to Enalapril
Enalapril Placebo 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg tablets
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Outpatients with a diagnosis of CHF NYHA class II-IV and reduced ejection fraction:
* LVEF ≤ 35% at Visit 1 (any local measurement, made within the past 6 months using echocardiography, MUGA, CT scanning, MRI or ventricular angiography is also acceptable, provided no subsequent measurement above 35%)
* NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml at Visit 1 OR NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/ml at Visit 1 and a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months (according to central laboratory measurements)
* Patients must be on an ACEI or an ARB at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before Visit 1.
* Patients must be treated with a β-blocker, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (reason should be documented if patients reported contraindications or intolerance).
* An aldosterone antagonist should also be considered in all patients, taking account of renal function, serum potassium and tolerability. If given, the dose of aldosterone antagonist should be optimized according to guideline recommendations and patient tolerability, and should be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Other evidence-based therapy for HF should also be considered e.g. cardiac resynchronization therapy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in selected patients, as recommended by guidelines.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous documented history of intolerance to ACEIs or ARBs.
* Known history of angioedema.
* Requirement of treatment with both ACEIs and ARBs.
* Current acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF manifested by signs and symptoms that may require intravenous therapy).
* Symptomatic hypotension and/or a SBP \< 100 mmHg at screening or \< 95 mmHg at the end of run-in.
* Estimated GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as measured by the Japanese formula at screening, or the end of run-in or \> 35% decline in eGFR between screening and end of run-in (according to local measurements).
* Serum potassium \> 5.2 mmol/L (mEq/L) at screening or \> 5.4 mmol/L (mEq/L) at the end of run-in (according to local measurements).
* Acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac, carotid or other major CV surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or carotid angioplasty within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
* Documented untreated ventricular arrhythmia with syncopal episodes within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
* Symptomatic bradycardia or second (except asymptomatic Wenckebach block) or third degree heart block without a pacemaker.
* Presence of hemodynamically significant mitral and/or aortic valve disease, except mitral regurgitation secondary to left ventricular dilatation.
* Presence of other hemodynamically significant obstructive lesions of left ventricular outflow tract, including aortic and sub-aortic stenosis.
* Presence of bilateral renal artery stenosis.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Seto, Aichi-ken, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Chikushino-shi, Fukuka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kōriyama, Fukushima, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Amagasaki, Hyōgo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Takarazuka, Hyōgo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Morioka, Iwate, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Uji, Kyoto, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Saku, Nagano, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kashihara, Nara, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Ōita, Oita Prefecture, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Hachiōji, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Yonago, Tottori, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Shūnan, Yamaguchi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Saitama, , Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLCZ696B1301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id