Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

NCT ID: NCT02468232

Last Updated: 2023-12-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-15

Study Completion Date

2021-02-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. compared to enalapril 10 mg b.i.d., in addition to the background heart failure (HF) treatment, on delaying time to first occurrence of either cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization events in Japanese patients with stable chronic heart failure (CHF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-IV and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study consisted of two parts: the core part and the Open label extension (OLE) epoch.

The core part of this study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active-controlled study to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. and enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. on CV mortality and morbidity reduction in Japanese HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Patients who met the eligibility criteria at screening entered a 2 week, single-blind, active treatment run-in epoch in which they received LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. Patients who tolerated LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks during the double-blind treatment epoch. The patient randomization was stratified by using NT-proBNP measured at the screening visit as a stratification factor. The patients were then titrated up to the target dose of LCZ696 200 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. if they tolerated 4 weeks treatment of LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. Dose adjustment (LCZ696 50-100 mg b.i.d. \& enalapril 2.5-5 mg b.i.d.) was permitted if not tolerated at the target dose of study drugs during the double-blind treatment epoch.

This was an event-driven study in which subjects remained on the study (regardless of whether receiving investigational medications) until the projected number of patients with primary events (approximately 57 events) had been reached.

The Open label extension (OLE) epoch was conducted following the completion of the core part, with the aim to provide access to LCZ696 for eligible subjects until the marketed product was available in Japan or 2 years from the date of the first subject enrolled in the OLE epoch, whichever occurred first, and also to obtain the safety and tolerability data of long-term treatment with LCZ696.

Upon completion of the core part, the eligibility of the subjects to enter the OLE epoch was assessed by the investigator at OLE baseline (Visit 301), which occurred on the same day as the end of study (EOS) visit of the core part (Visit 299). At this visit, subjects were switched to open-label LCZ696.

At Visit 302 (2 to 4 weeks after Visit 301), subjects who tolerated the open-label LCZ696 and met the safety monitoring criteria were up-titrated to the next higher level of daily dose. Thereafter, subject visits occurred at 8 weeks, and then every 4 months until EOS visit for OLE epoch.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HF-rEF)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

chronic heart failure cardiovascular death hospitalization outcome study worsening heart failure NT-proBNP NYHA KCCQ HF-rEF

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LCZ696

Before randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind epoch, randomized patients in this arm started with 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 200 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 100 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LCZ696

Intervention Type DRUG

The target dose during the study was LCZ696 200 mg bid given orally. LCZ696 was supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets.

Placebo to Enalapril

Intervention Type DRUG

Enalapril Placebo 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg tablets

Enalapril

Before randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind period, all randomized patients in this arm received enalapril 5mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 10 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 5 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enalapril

Intervention Type DRUG

The target dose during the study was enalapril 10 mg bid given orally. Enalapril was provided as 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets.

Placebo to LCZ696

Intervention Type DRUG

LCZ696 Placebo 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LCZ696

The target dose during the study was LCZ696 200 mg bid given orally. LCZ696 was supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Enalapril

The target dose during the study was enalapril 10 mg bid given orally. Enalapril was provided as 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to LCZ696

LCZ696 Placebo 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Enalapril

Enalapril Placebo 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
* Outpatients with a diagnosis of CHF NYHA class II-IV and reduced ejection fraction:
* LVEF ≤ 35% at Visit 1 (any local measurement, made within the past 6 months using echocardiography, MUGA, CT scanning, MRI or ventricular angiography is also acceptable, provided no subsequent measurement above 35%)
* NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml at Visit 1 OR NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/ml at Visit 1 and a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months (according to central laboratory measurements)
* Patients must be on an ACEI or an ARB at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before Visit 1.
* Patients must be treated with a β-blocker, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (reason should be documented if patients reported contraindications or intolerance).
* An aldosterone antagonist should also be considered in all patients, taking account of renal function, serum potassium and tolerability. If given, the dose of aldosterone antagonist should be optimized according to guideline recommendations and patient tolerability, and should be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Other evidence-based therapy for HF should also be considered e.g. cardiac resynchronization therapy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in selected patients, as recommended by guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes, ACEIs, ARBs, NEP inhibitors as well as known or suspected contraindications to the study drugs.
* Previous documented history of intolerance to ACEIs or ARBs.
* Known history of angioedema.
* Requirement of treatment with both ACEIs and ARBs.
* Current acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF manifested by signs and symptoms that may require intravenous therapy).
* Symptomatic hypotension and/or a SBP \< 100 mmHg at screening or \< 95 mmHg at the end of run-in.
* Estimated GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as measured by the Japanese formula at screening, or the end of run-in or \> 35% decline in eGFR between screening and end of run-in (according to local measurements).
* Serum potassium \> 5.2 mmol/L (mEq/L) at screening or \> 5.4 mmol/L (mEq/L) at the end of run-in (according to local measurements).
* Acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac, carotid or other major CV surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or carotid angioplasty within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
* Documented untreated ventricular arrhythmia with syncopal episodes within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
* Symptomatic bradycardia or second (except asymptomatic Wenckebach block) or third degree heart block without a pacemaker.
* Presence of hemodynamically significant mitral and/or aortic valve disease, except mitral regurgitation secondary to left ventricular dilatation.
* Presence of other hemodynamically significant obstructive lesions of left ventricular outflow tract, including aortic and sub-aortic stenosis.
* Presence of bilateral renal artery stenosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seto, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chikushino-shi, Fukuka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kōriyama, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amagasaki, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Takarazuka, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Morioka, Iwate, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Uji, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saku, Nagano, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kashihara, Nara, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ōita, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hachiōji, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yonago, Tottori, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shūnan, Yamaguchi, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLCZ696B1301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id