PrOVE QUERI Project #1

NCT ID: NCT02765412

Last Updated: 2024-12-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

17033 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-15

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall goal of this project is to test two strategies for implementing a shared decision making tool to be used by providers while talking to patients about lung cancer screening. Eight participating sites will be randomized to compare standard implementation with intensive implementation. Additionally, the investigators will determine the factors that were most important for successful implementation of the shared decision making tool. Finally, the investigators will survey patients to evaluate the effects of Decision Precision on patient's knowledge of the risks and benefits of lung cancer screening, the quality of their decision making, and their satisfaction with care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall goal of this quality improvement project is to test two strategies for implementing shared decision making, which incorporates the Decision Precision lung cancer screening tool. The investigators will use multi-site, cluster-based randomization to compare standard implementation with intensive implementation. Additionally, the investigators will determine the factors that were most important for successful implementation of the shared decision making tool. Finally, the investigators will have a human subjects research component to evaluate the effects of Decision Precision on patient's knowledge of the risks and benefits of lung cancer screening, the quality of their decision making, and their satisfaction with care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prevention and Control

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

decision support patient preferences risk adjustment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

standard implementation

Webinar, Promotion, Tool Access, academic detailing + Audit and Feedback

Webinar, Promotion, and Tool Access

Intervention Type OTHER

All sites will receive a professionally developed, 15-minute webinar that describes the tool's development (e.g., how the algorithm was designed) and a tutorial on how to use the web-site. The investigators will promote the webinar and using the tool through key local leaders. A web-link to use the tool will be placed within the lung cancer screening clinical reminder.

Audit and Feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Providers at all sites will have access to this system. It will provide feedback on the screening and shared decision making process (e.g., number of provider's eligible patients screened for lung cancer, use of the tool, patient knowledge and satisfaction from patient surveys).

Academic Detailing

Intervention Type OTHER

All sites will be offered an academic detailing approach to implementation of Lung Decision Precision. A trained detailer will travel to all sites who agree to a visit. The detailer will meet with individual primary care providers whenever possible, and groups of providers as necessary. He will present evidence for a risk-based approach to screening and how to use the tool with patients to make tailored screening recommendations.

intensive implementation

Webinar, Promotion, and Tool Access, academic detailing + Audit and Feedback + LEAP

Webinar, Promotion, and Tool Access

Intervention Type OTHER

All sites will receive a professionally developed, 15-minute webinar that describes the tool's development (e.g., how the algorithm was designed) and a tutorial on how to use the web-site. The investigators will promote the webinar and using the tool through key local leaders. A web-link to use the tool will be placed within the lung cancer screening clinical reminder.

LEAP

Intervention Type OTHER

Sites randomized to intensive implementation will be offered participation in the LEAP program. LEAP (Learn. Engage. Act. Program) is a multi-week, online learning collaborative using systems redesign techniques to help sites identify and overcome barriers to implementation of shared decision making (use of the Decision Precision tool).

Audit and Feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Providers at all sites will have access to this system. It will provide feedback on the screening and shared decision making process (e.g., number of provider's eligible patients screened for lung cancer, use of the tool, patient knowledge and satisfaction from patient surveys).

Academic Detailing

Intervention Type OTHER

All sites will be offered an academic detailing approach to implementation of Lung Decision Precision. A trained detailer will travel to all sites who agree to a visit. The detailer will meet with individual primary care providers whenever possible, and groups of providers as necessary. He will present evidence for a risk-based approach to screening and how to use the tool with patients to make tailored screening recommendations.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Webinar, Promotion, and Tool Access

All sites will receive a professionally developed, 15-minute webinar that describes the tool's development (e.g., how the algorithm was designed) and a tutorial on how to use the web-site. The investigators will promote the webinar and using the tool through key local leaders. A web-link to use the tool will be placed within the lung cancer screening clinical reminder.

Intervention Type OTHER

LEAP

Sites randomized to intensive implementation will be offered participation in the LEAP program. LEAP (Learn. Engage. Act. Program) is a multi-week, online learning collaborative using systems redesign techniques to help sites identify and overcome barriers to implementation of shared decision making (use of the Decision Precision tool).

Intervention Type OTHER

Audit and Feedback

Providers at all sites will have access to this system. It will provide feedback on the screening and shared decision making process (e.g., number of provider's eligible patients screened for lung cancer, use of the tool, patient knowledge and satisfaction from patient surveys).

Intervention Type OTHER

Academic Detailing

All sites will be offered an academic detailing approach to implementation of Lung Decision Precision. A trained detailer will travel to all sites who agree to a visit. The detailer will meet with individual primary care providers whenever possible, and groups of providers as necessary. He will present evidence for a risk-based approach to screening and how to use the tool with patients to make tailored screening recommendations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

A&F AD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients at participating sites without documented exclusions for lung cancer screening who have had initial lung cancer screening clinical reminders resolved during the recruitment period

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusions for initial lung cancer screening clinical reminders:

* history of lung, pancreatic, liver or esophageal cancer
* a health factor on file indicating they have a life expectancy of less than 6 months or who already had a chest CT in the past 12 months
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tanner Caverly, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Campus of the VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lowery J, Fagerlin A, Larkin AR, Wiener RS, Skurla SE, Caverly TJ. Implementation of a Web-Based Tool for Shared Decision-making in Lung Cancer Screening: Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Evaluation. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e32399. doi: 10.2196/32399.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35363144 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QUE 15-286

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

QUX 16-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id