Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
2018-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nasal Packing Duration and Development of Pharyngitis After Septorhinoplasty Surgery
NCT06291402
Comparison of Chitodex Gel Vs NexFoam on Post-operative Outcomes in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
NCT05083741
Assessment of the New Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation Technique Using Piezosurgery: A Clinical and Radiographic Retrospective Study
NCT05872321
Study Evaluating Benefit of Using Fibrin Glue in Septorhinoplasty
NCT00713596
The Effect of Packing in Post Operative Management of FESS
NCT00793117
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a complication of anaesthesia and responsible for malaise of surgical patients. Furthermore, PONV has been shown causing additive costs due to anti-emetic drugs and prolonged hospitalisation. The occurrence of PONV is multifactorial. Beside individual patients factors, opioid use and type of surgery seem to be responsible for occurrence of PONV. Especially, sinus surgery carries a high risk of PONV. Blood from the operation site entering the stomach has been discussed the potential cause for PONV in this specific patient population.
Therefore, hypopharyngeal packing following orotracheal intubation is a common clinical practice to prevent blood passing through the esophagus and so to lower the incidence of PONV.
Unfortunately, there are limited data data supporting the effectiveness of this procedure. In contrast, some references suggest that hypopharyngeal packing may be associated with postoperative mucosal injury and sore throat with high impact on patients´ well-being.
To evaluate the usefulness and safety of hypopharyngeal packing the investigators perform prospective randomized study with the following objective:
1\. Does pharyngeal packing during sinus surgery increase the incidence of mucosal injury?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hypopharyngeal packing
Patients with indication for surgery of the sinuses were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups.
After standardized anaesthetic management and PONV prophylaxis routinely applied the patients were screened for mucosal injury on second postoperative day. Furthermore, the amount of analgetic and anti-emetic drugs and the severity of pain and PONV were recorded throughout the hospital stay.
Hypopharyngeal packing
After introduction and orotracheal intubation a hypopharyngeal packing soaked with Chlorhexidinbis (D-gluconat) is placed.
Without hypopharyngeal packing
Patients with indication for surgery of the sinuses were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups.
After standardized anaesthetic management and PONV prophylaxis routinely applied the patients were screened for mucosal injury on second postoperative day. Furthermore, the amount of analgetic and anti-emetic drugs and the severity of pain and PONV were recorded throughout the hospital stay.
Without Hypopharyngeal packing
After introduction and orotracheal intubation the patient will pass the operation without hypopharyngeal packing with a short tip coming out the mouth to imitate a packing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hypopharyngeal packing
After introduction and orotracheal intubation a hypopharyngeal packing soaked with Chlorhexidinbis (D-gluconat) is placed.
Without Hypopharyngeal packing
After introduction and orotracheal intubation the patient will pass the operation without hypopharyngeal packing with a short tip coming out the mouth to imitate a packing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients over 18 years of age
* Duration of surgery \> 1h
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under 18 years of age
* Chemotherapy with antiemetic medication
* Combined surgery (for example tonsillectomie and sinus surgery)
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marienhospital Osnabrück
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Saskia Jetten
P.D. Dr. med. M. Beiderlinden
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin Beiderlinden, PD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Marienhospital Osnabrück
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
mho 004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.