Clinical Trial of the Effect of Different Categories of Adhesive System
NCT ID: NCT02751970
Last Updated: 2016-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
185 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Wet and Overwet Dentin on the Clinical Performance of Two Universal Adhesive Systems
NCT07034235
Evaluation of the Reduced Dentin Etching Time Using Universal Adhesives in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
NCT06465849
Clinical Performance of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions at 2 Years
NCT04565938
Evaluation of Double Layer Application Using a Universal Adhesive in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
NCT06474494
Clinical Performance of Different Adhesive Strategies With a Universal System in Sclerosed Dentin in NCCL: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT05211908
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The success of resin composite restorations is reliant upon adhesion to the underlying tooth via adhesive systems. The mechanism of adhesion to enamel and dentine could be involved for one hand, the etching the substrates with 30-40% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin 3 steps etch-and- rinse approach or 2 steps when to combine the primer and adhesive into one bottle. For another hand, the self- etch systems with acid monomers in their primer, allow conditioning the surface without phosphoric acid step. So, they consist of either a self-etching primer accompanied by an adhesive resin applied as a subsequent step (2 steps) or a self-etch adhesive, which does not require a separate primer (1 step).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3 step ER & Dental restoration
Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin.
Dental restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
3 step ER
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% phosphoric acid, then applied primer, and then applied adhesive resin.
2 step ER & Dental restoration
Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of an adhesive/primer step.
Dental restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
2 step ER
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% of phosphoric acid, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
2 step SE & Dental restoration
Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates with acidic primer, followed by the application of adhesive resin.
Dental restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
2 step SE
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
1 step SE & Dental restoration
Dental restoration with etching and infiltrate the dental substrates with acidic primer/adhesive system.
Dental restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
1 step SE
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer/adhesive resin.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
3 step ER
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% phosphoric acid, then applied primer, and then applied adhesive resin.
2 step ER
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% of phosphoric acid, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
2 step SE
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
1 step SE
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer/adhesive resin.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with acceptable oral hygiene level,
* Patients with at least 20 teeth under occlusion.
* Patients with at least four non-carious cervical lesions in four different teeth
* Patients with maximum of eight lesions that needed to be restored.
* These lesions had to be non-carious, non-retentive, deeper than 1 mm, and involve both the enamel and dentin of vital teeth without mobility.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with severe or chronic periodontitis,
* Patients with heavy bruxism habits.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
OTHER
Universidad de Valparaiso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Issis luque
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Issis Luque, professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidad Valparaiso
Valparaíso, Región de Valparaíso, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chee B, Rickman LJ, Satterthwaite JD. Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E, Omurlu H. Two-year clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):192-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200012.
Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J. 2007 Jan;26(1):14-20. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.14.
Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Manzon E, Breschi L, Paolino D, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):33-8.
Moosavi H, Kimyai S, Forghani M, Khodadadi R. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):134-41. doi: 10.2341/12-110-CR. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Heintze SD, Blunck U, Gohring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):605-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.004. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):864-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003.
Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Jun;11(3):175-90.
van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000 Jul;16(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00019-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CB027-2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.