Preventive Skin Analgesia With Lidocaine Patch 5% for Controlling Post-thoracotomy Pain

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Thoracotomy is one of the most painful surgical incision. Uncontrolled acute post-thoracotomy pain reducing deep breathing exercises and secretion clearance increased the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications including atelectasis, hypoxemia, and postoperative pulmonary infections. Thus, an effective analgesia is crucial in order to reduce perioperative morbidity and hospitalization time and also to prevent chronic post-thoracotomy pain.

Thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral analgesia are currently the standard strategies for thoracic surgery but the difficult of performing them in all patients and their potential complications are all factors that limit their use. Systemic administration of opioids is the simplest and common strategy to provide analgesia but it may be associated with several undesirable effects, such as respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, constipation and vomiting.

In the recent years, preventive analgesia is become one of the most promising strategy of postoperative pain control. It is based on the concept of administering analgesic drugs before the occurrence of nociceptive input in order to prevent central sensitization. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia is unclear and there is no a consensus on its efficacy on controlling pain after thoracic procedure.

Pain following thoracotomy has a multifactorial genesis including surgical incision, intercostal nerve injury, pleural inflammation, and damage of pulmonary parenchyma and of diaphragm. Thus, a multimodal analgesia that intercepts the signalizing at numerous locations could be more effective than a single strategy targeting one site along the pain pathway.

Thus, in the present study, the clinical hypothesis was that the preemptive analgesia of the skin using a new tool as the Lidocaine patch 5% would improve the analgesic effects of systemic morphine analgesia for controlling post-operative pain following thoracotomy.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Continuous Wound Catheter Analgesia Associated With Intravenous Morphine PCA After Thoracotomy

NCT01698203

Pain Thoracotomy

COMPLETED PHASE4

Dose Finding Posterolateral Thoracotomy Study

NCT00807209

Postoperative Pain

TERMINATED PHASE2

Percutaneous Ketamine Versus Lidocaine or Placebo, for Post-Surgery Analgesia, in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Lung Resection

NCT00822133

Postoperative Pain

UNKNOWN PHASE4

The Impact of Intrapleural Block on Postoperative Pain Caused by Drainage Tubes After Thoracoscopic Surgery

NCT07294755

Postoperative Analgesia

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine VS Magnesium Sulphate With Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Block for Thoracotomy Pain

NCT05851768

Analgesia

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was an unicenter, double-blinded, placebo controlled, parallel-group, prospective study conducted at Thoracic Surgery Unit and Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of Second University of Naples from January 2013 to May 2015.

All consecutive patients undergoing undergoing anatomical resection by standard lateral thoracotomy for treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to Lidocaine or Placebo group in 1:1 ratio and no changes to methods after trial commencement as type of randomization or eligibility criteria were attended.

For patients assigned to active group, Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, PA, USA) measuring 10 x 14 cm and containing 700 mg of Lidocaine, was applied to cover the planned skin incision, marked with a pen by surgeon. Patch was applied for 12 hours during the night, removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day, and then a new patch was applied at the same level the night after. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy. In the control group, a placebo patch, that was identical in appearance to the active patch but did not contain Lidocaine, was applied in the same manner for the same time. The pain service, surgical team, and patients were all blinded to treatment group assigned.

All patients received the same anesthetic protocol. All operations were performed in the early morning just after that the patch was removed. The general anesthesia was inducted with i.v. midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, i.v. fentanyl 1-1.4 µg/Kg, i.v. propofol 2.5 mg/kg, i.v. and rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg. The patient was maintained with desflurane 4-6%, sulfentanil 0.5-1 micro/Kg, rocuronium bromide 0.6-0.8 mg/Kg, based on heart rate and blood pressure stability. A selective ventilation was performed with a double-lumen endobronchial tube in all cases and no additional analgesics were injected during surgery.

All patients had the same length of skin incision and a standard muscle-sparing lateral thoracotomy. The latissimus dorsi muscle and the underlying serratus anterior muscle were spared and the chest was entered over the top of the unresected and unshingled sixth rib. A standard Finocchietto chest retractor was then placed and slowly opened to avoid rib fracture. After completion of the appropriate anatomical lung resection, a single 28 F chest drainage was systematically placed in pleural cavity. The same chest closure was performed in all patients in a standard manner using intracostal sutures.

Patient was extubated in the operating room and transferred to the surgical ward. The postoperative analgesia was performed with intravenous morphine administered through Patient Controlled-Analgesia (Automed 3300, AceMedical Co.) delivery. Morphine 1 mg was given for each request and continuous infusion was at a rate of 1 mg/h. Both groups had a 10 min lockout period and a safe higher limit of 20 mg in 4 hours. If VAS scores exceeded 4/10 scores, rescue analgesia was intravenously administered according to a standardized institutional protocol for pain treatment until the pain was relieved to a level falling below a VAS score \< 4. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) was continued for up to 2 days, until patients could tolerate oral opioid medications and/or anti-inflammatory analgesics. However, these medications were not considered in the analysis.

The intergroup differences were assessed in order to evaluate whether the pre-emptive analgesia obtained with Lidocaine patch would have effects on pain scores (primary end-point), consumption of analgesics, recovery of respiratory function and peripheral painful pathways (secondary end-points).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine Group

Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, PA, USA) measuring 10 x 14 cm and containing 700 mg of Lidocaine, was applied to cover the planned skin incision, marked with a pen by surgeon. Patch was applied for 12 hours during the night, removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day, and then a new patch was applied at the same level the night after. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine patch 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine patch 5% was applied to cover the planned skin incision for 12 hours during the night and then was removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Placebo Patch

A patch, that was identical in appearance to the active patch but did not contain Lidocaine, was applied to cover the planned skin incision, marked with a pen by surgeon. Patch was applied for 12 hours during the night, removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day, and then a new patch was applied at the same level the night after. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo patch

Intervention Type DRUG

A patch without lidocaine was applied to cover the planned skin incision for 12 hours during the night and then was removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine patch 5%

Lidocaine patch 5% was applied to cover the planned skin incision for 12 hours during the night and then was removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo patch

A patch without lidocaine was applied to cover the planned skin incision for 12 hours during the night and then was removed for the subsequent 12 hours during the day. This process was continued for 3 days before thoracotomy

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidoderm® (Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, PA, USA)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* More than 18 years old
* Anatomical resection by standard lateral thoracotomy for treatment of non small cell lung cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to Lidocaine
* American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification score more than 3
* History of previous thoracic surgical procedures and/or of chronic pain or taking regular analgesics
* Pneumonectomy or concomitant decortication and/or chest wall injury or resection,
* Psychiatric illness
* Participation to other studies

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes