Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central Sensory Impairments for Balance in mTBI
NCT ID: NCT02748109
Last Updated: 2025-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
132 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-11
2019-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Can Early Initiation of Rehabilitation With Wearable Sensor Technology Improve Outcomes in mTBI?
NCT03479541
Wearable Technology to Characterize and Treat mTBI Subtypes: Biofeedback-Based Precision Rehabilitation
NCT06381674
Vestibular Rehabilitation and Balance Training After Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT01695577
Use of Virtual and Augmented Reality Devices in Vestibular Physical Therapy for mTBI
NCT05326100
Objective Dual-task Turning Measures for Return-to-duty Assessments
NCT03892291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Plan: The proposed 4-year study has two parts: 1) Cross-sectional study (Aim I: Balance Assessment) to identify and characterize maladaptive balance control strategies after mTBI compared to healthy controls and 2) Interventional randomized pilot study (Aim II: Balance Rehabilitation) using a novel ABF rehabilitation technique to ameliorate maladaptive balance control strategies after TBI. Subjects in Aim II will be a subset from Aim I and studies will occur simultaneously.
Methods: I) Balance Assessment: To characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI who have chronic, non-resolving balance deficits compared to healthy control subjects without a history of mTBI. We hypothesize that a) objective measures of central sensorimotor integration, static and dynamic balance will better distinguish people with mTBI from control subjects than clinical measures, b) a subset of people with mTBI will have abnormal central sensori-motor integration (CSMI) test measures, even without peripheral vestibular or ocular motor deficits c) the relationship between poorer static/dynamic balance performance and mTBI is regulated/mediated by CSMI. We will test 130 subjects between the ages of 18 and 60; 65 with chronic (\> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits and 65 healthy age and gender matched control subjects without a history of mTBI. We will obtain objective measures of static and dynamic balance using wearable inertial sensors and determine how these measures relate to central sensorimotor integration. We will also obtain laboratory measures of peripheral vestibular function and ocular motor function to help classify people and to consider as potential covariates in rehabilitation efficacy.
II) Balance Rehabilitation: To determine the efficacy of a novel, ABF balance rehabilitation program to improve central sensorimotor integration, static and dynamic balance, and functional activity in patients with chronic mTBI. We hypothesize that a) CSMI scores will improve with rehabilitation and ABF will increase the improvement of CSMI scores beyond the standard of care, b) ABF intervention will improve objective summary measures of balance and c) people with central sensorimotor integration impairment will show sustained improvement in CSMI scores and balance after rehabilitation. We will randomize 40 subjects between the ages of 18 and 60; 65 with chronic (\> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits from Aim I who have abnormal CSMI into either the ABF rehabilitation group or the standard of care group. People will be tested before and after a 6-week intervention period and again 6 week later to determine long-term changes. Normal/abnormal vestibular and ocular motor function will be used as covariates to determine if peripheral deficits affect the efficacy of ABF rehabilitation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vestibular Rehabilitation + audio biofeedback
Vestibular rehabilitation paired with audio biofeedback
Vestibular Rehabilitation + audio biofeedback
Vestibular rehabilitation paired with audio biofeedback for balance control 2 times per week with a physical therapist for 6 weeks.
Vestibular Rehabilitation
Vestibular rehabilitation
Vestibular Rehabilitation
Standard vestibular rehabilitation 2 times per week with a physical therapist for 6 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vestibular Rehabilitation + audio biofeedback
Vestibular rehabilitation paired with audio biofeedback for balance control 2 times per week with a physical therapist for 6 weeks.
Vestibular Rehabilitation
Standard vestibular rehabilitation 2 times per week with a physical therapist for 6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have minimal cognitive impairment; a score between 0 and 8 on the Short Blessed test for cognitive function
* may have or not had a loss of consciousness (LOC) with their initial injury
-OR-
* have no recent history of mTBI or brain injury and related complaints
Exclusion Criteria
* meet criteria for moderate to severe substance use disorder within the past month, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V)
* display behavior that would significantly interfere with validity of data collection or safety during study
* be in significant pain during the evaluation (5/10 by patient subjective report)
* be a pregnant female (balance considerations)
* have past history of peripheral vestibular pathology or ocular motor deficits
* have significant hearing loss that would interfere with the use of an auditory biofeedback device; hearing loss no worse than 30 decibel (dB) HL (PTA 0.5-3 kHz), in better ear, with the difference in ears being less than 15 dB PTA
* be unable to abstain for 24 hours in advance of testing in the use medications that might impair their balance (meclizine, scopolamine, benzodiazepines such as Valium, sedatives such as Ambien, narcotic pain medications, and antihistamines)
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Portland VA Medical Center
FED
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laurie King
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurie King, Ph.D., P.T.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor of Neurology, OHSU
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fino PC, Raffegeau TE, Parrington L, Peterka RJ, King LA. Head stabilization during standing in people with persisting symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech. 2020 Nov 9;112:110045. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110045. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Stuart S, Parrington L, Morris R, Martini DN, Fino PC, King LA. Gait measurement in chronic mild traumatic brain injury: A model approach. Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Feb;69:102557. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102557. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
Martini DN, Parrington L, Stuart S, Fino PC, King LA. Gait Performance in People with Symptomatic, Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jan 15;38(2):218-224. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.6986. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Stuart S, Parrington L, Martini DN, Kreter N, Chesnutt JC, Fino PC, King LA. Analysis of Free-Living Mobility in People with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Healthy Controls: Quality over Quantity. J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):139-145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6450. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Peterka RJ, Murchison CF, Parrington L, Fino PC, King LA. Implementation of a Central Sensorimotor Integration Test for Characterization of Human Balance Control During Stance. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 13;9:1045. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01045. eCollection 2018.
Fino PC, Wilhelm J, Parrington L, Stuart S, Chesnutt JC, King LA. Inertial Sensors Reveal Subtle Motor Deficits When Walking With Horizontal Head Turns After Concussion. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Mar/Apr;34(2):E74-E81. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000418.
Fino PC, Parrington L, Walls M, Sippel E, Hullar TE, Chesnutt JC, King LA. Abnormal Turning and Its Association with Self-Reported Symptoms in Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018 May 15;35(10):1167-1177. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5231. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Fino PC, Peterka RJ, Hullar TE, Murchison C, Horak FB, Chesnutt JC, King LA. Assessment and rehabilitation of central sensory impairments for balance in mTBI using auditory biofeedback: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0812-7.
Theodoroff SM, Papesh M, Duffield T, Novak M, Gallun F, King L, Chesnutt J, Rockwood R, Palandri M, Hullar T. Concussion Management Guidelines Neglect Auditory Symptoms. Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):82-85. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000874.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDMRP-MR141257
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
15010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.