HeartLight Pulse Study: Evaluation of Heart Rate Using an Electronic Stethoscope and Pre Placed ECG in the Delivery Room

NCT ID: NCT02747069

Last Updated: 2018-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the accuracy of both an electronic stethoscope and electrocardiogram (ECG) to evaluate heart rate in neonatal patients in the delivery suite.

The initial phase of this study will assess the electronic stethoscope use on stable neonates on the neonatal care prior to use in the delivery room.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Up to 10% of newborns (79K/yr in United Kingdom, 13 million/yr worldwide) require some form of resuscitation at birth. It is estimated that approximately 7 million babies worldwide, especially the premature group, will require more advanced resuscitation. The correct, structured management of the resuscitation in the few 'golden' minutes after birth is critical to prevent significant morbidity (e.g. cerebral palsy due to asphyxiation) or death. There is strong evidence that standardised resuscitation training and algorithms significantly improve newborn outcomes and could reduce mortality by 30% in certain healthcare institution. International newborn resuscitation guidelines state that "a prompt increase in heart rate remains the most sensitive indicator of resuscitation efficacy" and that the stethoscope should be the primary means of assessing heart rate (HR). Provision of an accurate and timely HR value is essential if the best care outcomes are to be achieved. Establishing the HR category allows the resuscitator to decide if the HR is \>100 bpm (suggests the baby is well or resuscitation is effective), between 60-100bpm (resuscitation required initially focusing on the airway) or \<60bpm (requires much more intensive resuscitation which could include CPR). International guidelines recommend assessing the HR every 30 seconds with a stethoscope to track changes and hence efficacy of resuscitation. However, a number of studies demonstrate that newborn healthcare providers estimate the HR category incorrectly in about 1 in 3 cases, potentially resulting in the incorrect management of the baby. There is now strong evidence linking the need for resuscitation and a poor neurodevelopmental outcome in later childhood. Indeed, a number of large cohort studies have demonstrated that even if a baby requires initial resuscitation, and no further need for on-going care, they are at an increased risk of low intelligence quotient in childhood and are less likely to have paid employment or go to University when adults.

More recently electronic stethoscopes (ES) have been used to determine heart rate variability. Several studies have shown that an ES can reliably evaluate the heart rate in adults, but only one recently published study has demonstrated its use in the neonatal patient. The advantage of using an ES over ECG and pulse oximetry is fast acquisition of HR (\<5 sec) and ease of application, both attributes are beneficial in the delivery suite scenario. Furthermore, assessment of HR by auscultation (using a stethoscope) is still the primary technique used in many settings.

ECG, an established and accurate method of monitoring HR, is rarely used in the delivery room for a number of reasons including difficulty ensuring adhesion to the skin (the baby is wet/covered in vernix) and skin damage in premature babies caused by stripping of the electrodes. Current ECG systems also require 3 electrodes to be positioned which can delay resuscitation further. To improve HR assessment at birth we aim to tackle this problem through a variety of means. ECG is not routinely used for delivery room resuscitations mainly due to the impracticalities of attaching the electrodes and setting up the system. Current NICU practice is to place the ECG electrodes onto the baby's chest. It is also possible for the electrodes to be placed on the baby's which is a method commonly adopted on the NICU. Preterm babies are routinely delivered into a plastic bags/wraps to minimise heat loss. By pre-placing the ECG electrodes onto the back of the bag/wrap with small conducting holes in, it should be possible to place the baby onto the bag and connect with the ECG electrodes with a routinely used clinical conducting gel. The baby could be placed onto them and time would be saved by not needing to stick the electrodes on individually and utilising the baby's weight to establish the electrode connections. This would avoid the need to place them individually, which is often time consuming and challenging as they don't still well to wet skin, and avoid skin stripping when removed later.

This study will initially assess the accuracy and reliability of an electronic stethoscopes to evaluate heart rate on stable patients on the neonatal unit compared to routine ECG and pulse oximetry measurements. This will allow comparison of the pre placed ECG system in the second phase of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Premature Birth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NICU electronic stethoscope

Neonatal patients of any gestation admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and undergoing routine monitoring with ECG and pulse oximetry Heart rate will be evaluated using an electronic stethoscope

NICU electronic stethoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Assessment of heart rate using the electronic stethoscope for up to 10 minutes compared to ECG and pulse oximetry devices used to monitor neonates whilst on NICU

Newborns <32 weeks and ECG

Neonatal patients \<32 weeks gestation Heart rate will be assessed at the time of delivery with both an electronic stethoscope and ECG using a pre placed lead system

NICU electronic stethoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Assessment of heart rate using the electronic stethoscope for up to 10 minutes compared to ECG and pulse oximetry devices used to monitor neonates whilst on NICU

Newborns <32 weeks and ECG

Intervention Type DEVICE

The three leads from the ECG device will be pre placed onto a plastic bag prior to delivery. The pre term infant (\<32 weeks) placed into the bag at the time of delivery and heart rate will be assessed for up to 30 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NICU electronic stethoscope

Assessment of heart rate using the electronic stethoscope for up to 10 minutes compared to ECG and pulse oximetry devices used to monitor neonates whilst on NICU

Intervention Type DEVICE

Newborns <32 weeks and ECG

The three leads from the ECG device will be pre placed onto a plastic bag prior to delivery. The pre term infant (\<32 weeks) placed into the bag at the time of delivery and heart rate will be assessed for up to 30 minutes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All must have written informed consent from the participant's mother
* Phase 1: Any neonate requiring NICU admission and routine monitoring with ECG.
* Phase 2: Preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation delivered into a plastic bag/wrap

Exclusion Criteria

* Phase 1: Infants undergoing comfort care (palliative care). Infants deemed too sick, as assessed by the clinical team caring for them, to tolerate additional procedures. This is unusual but would normally include infants who become more unstable with increased handling
* Phase 2: Infants \>32 weeks gestation Infants where resuscitation is unlikely to be instigated (eg. known lethal condition)
Maximum Eligible Age

4 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heartlight Systems Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nottingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Don Sharkey, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nottingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nottingham NHS Trust

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15124

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long QT Syndrome Screening in Newborns
NCT02412709 UNKNOWN PHASE2