Substitution of Acetate by Citrate in the Bicarbonate Based Hemodialysis

NCT ID: NCT02745340

Last Updated: 2016-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acetate is the primary acidifying solution used in bicarbonate-based hemodialysis worldwide. It has been published in small trials or case series that the addition of acetate is associated with a rise in nitric oxide production of vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and myocardial cells as a sign of vascular dysfunction. Furthermore clinical side effects of dialysis e.g. nausea, malnutrition, intradialytic blood pressure drops, induction of proinflammatory cytokines and activation of complement and leukocytes have been described with acetate.

Citrate on the other hand was associated with: Acid-base disorders (metabolic alkalosis), Disturbances of the calcium homeostasis (Hypocalcemia), but also anti-inflammatory effects. Both dialysate additives (citrate and acetate) are commercially available and are used world wide in dialysis centers.

The investigators hypothesize that substitution of acetate by citrate reduces the cardiovascular risk (measured by a change in the surrogate parameter of pulse wave velocity and Augmentation index) and might improves quality of life in the participants. Furthermore the investigators speculate that citrate in the dialysis solution could reduce systemic inflammation in the participants of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acetate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetate by Citrate substitution and vice versa

Intervention Type OTHER

substitution of acetate by citrate in dialysis fluid

Citrate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acetate by Citrate substitution and vice versa

Intervention Type OTHER

substitution of acetate by citrate in dialysis fluid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetate by Citrate substitution and vice versa

substitution of acetate by citrate in dialysis fluid

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* time since initiation of dialysis \> 3 months
* age \> 18 years
* dialysis 3x/week for \> 4 hrs

Exclusion Criteria

* ongoing infection
* pregnancy
* lack of written and informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gambro Renal Products, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

PD Dr. Christoph Schmaderer

Study Principal Investigator (Prüfer)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christoph Schmaderer, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

attending, board certified nephrologist

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nierenzentrum24 NEUPERLACH

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Nierenzentrum Bogenhausen

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christoph Schmaderer, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

0049-89-4140 ext. 5053

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Carla Maceiczyk, M.D.

Role: primary

Richard Bieber, M.D.

Role: primary

0049 89 4522380

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Molina Nunez M, de Alarcon R, Roca S, Alvarez G, Ros MS, Jimeno C, Bucalo L, Villegas I, Garcia MA. Citrate versus acetate-based dialysate in on-line haemodiafiltration. A prospective cross-over study. Blood Purif. 2015;39(1-3):181-187. doi: 10.1159/000371569.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25791278 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

344/15s

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.