Fluid Resuscitation Optimization in Surgical Trauma Patients (FROST)
NCT ID: NCT02742974
Last Updated: 2016-04-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
196 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Standard Versus Goal-Directed Perioperative Fluid Management (GDT) for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy
NCT02145871
Impact of Intraoperative Instillation of Normothermal Saline on the Prevention of Intraoperative Hypothermia and Perioperative Morbidity of Prostatic Enucleation With Holmium Laser
NCT04761224
Fluid Optimization in Liver Surgery
NCT01627808
Trans-Rectal Ultrasound-Guided (TRUS) Adverse Events
NCT00923416
Pre-Implementation Study of Improving Thoracic Surgical Care Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROS)
NCT05311670
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Tissue ischemia precipitates a disruption in the balance of oxygen delivery and consumption often yielding a conversion from aerobic to anaerobic processes in order to maintain metabolic functionality. The conversion to anaerobic processes leads to the production of lactic acid and a resulting consumption of the body's basic buffers. Clinically, the consumption of the body's basic buffers is frequently referred to as the development of a base deficit. Both the production of lactic acid and the development of a base deficit have been positively linked to the increased morbidity and mortality in multiple critically ill patient populations, including those with traumatic injuries.
Multiple studies have linked the rate at which base deficit corrects or lactic acid clears to the likelihood of survival. Accordingly, hemodynamic monitoring can provide vital information concerning cardiovascular function including vascular volume, vascular capacitance, and cardiac performance. Obtaining this information enables clinicians to tailor interventions to target specific components of the cardiovascular system in order to most effectively reverse the cause of tissue hypoxia, elevation in lactic acid, and base deficit, while simultaneously decreasing the likelihood of causing harm through unnecessary or unwarranted changes in management.
Advancements in hemodynamic monitoring technology now allow clinicians to obtain data by using minimally invasive techniques. Devices utilizing this technology can be connected to vascular access routinely utilized in the intensive care setting such as arterial lines. These devices provide parameters such as systolic pressure variation (SPV), pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid responsiveness of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Studies evaluating these parameters have shown them to have a 84-94% positive predictive value for fluid responsiveness. In addition, higher variability in studied parameters were indicative of patients who were more likely to be responsive to fluid challenges.
Modern clinical management in critically ill patients with cardiovascular dysfunction hinges on reversal of the underlying cause of cardiovascular dysfunction. Recent management strategies have used a multi-faceted approach in which multiple processes of potential dysfunction can be monitored and managed simultaneously. Management is goal directed with clearly defined endpoints for the management of vascular volume, cardiac performance as well as maintenance of vascular capacitance. Hemodynamic monitoring technology is essential in providing data that will allow clinical interventions to be tailored to patient-specific physiology and provide goals for titration of therapy.
In recent years, data has emerged using goal directed therapy in the surgical patient population with favorable outcomes suggesting a decrease in post-operative organ dysfunction, ICU and hospital length of stay, however, there is limited data in the trauma patient population. This study endeavors to determine if the implementation of intra-operative monitoring will decrease the incidence of post-operative complications such as acute lung injury, infections, thromboembolism, cerebral vascular accident, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction; in addition to the traditional outcome measures of mortality and length of stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FloTrac™ and EV1000™ pre and post-operatively
Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the pre and post-operative period in the control arm.
No interventions assigned to this group
FloTrac™ and EV1000™ peri-operatively
Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the perioperative period for the intervention arm
FloTrac™ and EV1000™
Interventions to improve cardiovascular performance will be made in all patients whose cardiovascular function is sub-optimal in accordance with routine clinical management during trauma resuscitation. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to the intervention or control arm of the study based on the process outlined in the protocol. Patients assigned to the intervention arm will have intra-operative hemodynamic monitoring performed by the anesthesia staff and cardiovascular interventions will be based off of the algorithm described in the protocol. Members of anesthesia or the surgical team can initiate interventions as indicated during routine ICU care or intra-operatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FloTrac™ and EV1000™
Interventions to improve cardiovascular performance will be made in all patients whose cardiovascular function is sub-optimal in accordance with routine clinical management during trauma resuscitation. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to the intervention or control arm of the study based on the process outlined in the protocol. Patients assigned to the intervention arm will have intra-operative hemodynamic monitoring performed by the anesthesia staff and cardiovascular interventions will be based off of the algorithm described in the protocol. Members of anesthesia or the surgical team can initiate interventions as indicated during routine ICU care or intra-operatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Injury Severity Score \> 15 (indicator of anticipated trauma mortality)
3. Admission to Surgical-Trauma ICU (STICU)
4. Anticipated surgery within 72 hours of admission
5. American Society of Anesthesiology patient classification status (ASA) 2-5
6. Lactic acid \> 2.5 within 24 hours of surgical procedure or Base deficit ≥ - 5 mmol/L, or persistent requirement for vasopressor support within 24 hours of surgical procedure
7. Patient requires mechanical ventilation prior to consenting surgery
8. Vascular devices that include a minimum of an arterial line
9. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring initiated prior to first surgical procedure unless patient is taken emergently, e.g. OR from trauma bay
10. Patients requiring emergent initial operative procedures will be eligible for consenting if above criteria are met prior to their second surgical procedure
11. Anticipated operative procedure precipitating evaluation and/or consenting for study must be \> 30 minutes in duration
* Procedures \< 30 minutes would not result in significant metabolic stress necessitating a continuation of MIHM
Exclusion Criteria
2. Exclusions due to limitations with respect to accuracy of MIHM:
* Patients not intubated prior to surgical procedure
* Patients requiring an open thoracotomy
* Patients with known history of surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease
* Patients with pre-existing atrial arrhythmias
* Patients who are on cardiopulmonary bypass
3. Isolated acute cerebral injury and/or traumatic cerebral injury
* Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing intracranial pressures
4. Cardiac arrest prior to enrollment
5. Patients with pre-existing, dialysis dependent, renal failure upon admission
* Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing renal failure
6. Patients with pre-existing cirrhosis
* Hepatic failure results in abnormal clearance of lactic acid
7. Patients with no survival injuries, e.g. gunshot wound to the head
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edwards Lifesciences
INDUSTRY
CAMC Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Audis Bethea, PharmD, BCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMC Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charleston Area Medical Center, General Hospital
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Elliott DC. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg. 2003 May;185(5):485-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00044-8.
Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Greenspan J. Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):584-8; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00014.
Cerovic O, Golubovic V, Spec-Marn A, Kremzar B, Vidmar G. Relationship between injury severity and lactate levels in severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Aug;29(8):1300-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1753-8. Epub 2003 Jul 9.
Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, Schorr C, Pope J, Casner E, Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP, Trzeciak S; Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis. Shock. 2009 Jul;32(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e3181971d47.
Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, Tomlanovich MC. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1637-42. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000132904.35713.a7.
Callaway DW, Shapiro NI, Donnino MW, Baker C, Rosen CL. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality in normotensive elderly blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1040-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181895e9e.
Dunne JR, Tracy JK, Scalea TM, Napolitano LM. Lactate and base deficit in trauma: does alcohol or drug use impair their predictive accuracy? J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):959-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000158508.84009.49.
Ouellet JF, Roberts DJ, Tiruta C, Kirkpatrick AW, Mercado M, Trottier V, Dixon E, Feliciano DV, Ball CG. Admission base deficit and lactate levels in Canadian patients with blunt trauma: are they useful markers of mortality? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1532-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dd5a.
Ziegler DW, Wright JG, Choban PS, Flancbaum L. A prospective randomized trial of preoperative "optimization" of cardiac function in patients undergoing elective peripheral vascular surgery. Surgery. 1997 Sep;122(3):584-92. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90132-x.
Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. No abstract available.
Otero RM, Nguyen HB, Huang DT, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Gunnerson KJ, Trzeciak S, Sherwin R, Holthaus CV, Osborn T, Rivers EP. Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited: concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings. Chest. 2006 Nov;130(5):1579-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1579.
Monnet X, Dres M, Ferre A, Le Teuff G, Jozwiak M, Bleibtreu A, Le Deley MC, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):330-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes182. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5.
Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F.
Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg. 1995 Apr;130(4):423-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040085019.
Bishop MH, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Meade P, Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Wo CJ, Rimle DA, Kram HB, Umali R, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of survivor values of cardiac index, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption as resuscitation endpoints in severe trauma. J Trauma. 1995 May;38(5):780-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199505000-00018.
Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, Schenke S, van Hout N, Sakka SG. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):194-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen126. Epub 2008 May 28.
Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, Hluchy M, Kasal E, Svitak R, Pradl R, Stepan M. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R118. doi: 10.1186/cc9070. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Lobo SM, Lobo FR, Polachini CA, Patini DS, Yamamoto AE, de Oliveira NE, Serrano P, Sanches HS, Spegiorin MA, Queiroz MM, Christiano AC Jr, Savieiro EF, Alvarez PA, Teixeira SP, Cunrath GS. Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients [ISRCTN42445141]. Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R72. doi: 10.1186/cc4913. Epub 2006 May 12.
Chytra I, Pradl R, Bosman R, Pelnar P, Kasal E, Zidkova A. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/cc5703.
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004 Jul 31;329(7460):258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38156.767118.7C. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
Lobo SM, Ronchi LS, Oliveira NE, Brandao PG, Froes A, Cunrath GS, Nishiyama KG, Netinho JG, Lobo FR. Restrictive strategy of intraoperative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R226. doi: 10.1186/cc10466. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0621. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Arkilic CF, Taguchi A, Sharma N, Ratnaraj J, Sessler DI, Read TE, Fleshman JW, Kurz A. Supplemental perioperative fluid administration increases tissue oxygen pressure. Surgery. 2003 Jan;133(1):49-55. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.80.
Polonen P, Ruokonen E, Hippelainen M, Poyhonen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000 May;90(5):1052-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200005000-00010.
Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2008 Jan;63(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05233.x.
Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, Fleming SC. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):634-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei223. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1069-76. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5454.
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):909-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.909.
Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Jan;88(1):65-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.1.65.
Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754.
Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
SOFA Calculator
APACHE II Calculator
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-159
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.