Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
187 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-03-04
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Treatment for UCD is either conservative management which involves a low-in-protein diet, drugs, and amino acid supplements or liver transplantation; each carries their own risks.
This study aims to help patients to make the decision about different management alternatives by providing them with scientific information that is currently lacking.
Aim 1 of this study will compare survival, neurocognitive function, and patient-reported quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Outcome of N-Carbamylglutamate Treatment in Propionic Acidemia and Methylmalonic Acidemia
NCT01597440
Study of Treatment and Metabolism in Patients With Urea Cycle Disorders
NCT00004307
An Open-label Study to Investigate ECUR-506 in Male Babies Less Than 9 Months of Age With Neonatal Onset OTC Deficiency
NCT06255782
Increasing Ureagenesis in Inborn Errors of Metabolism With N-Carbamylglutamate
NCT01341379
A Collection of Case Studies in Infants With UCD to Evaluate Infant Growth and the Safety of a New Medical Food for UCD
NCT03911089
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment involves a special diet low in protein, drugs that help metabolize ammonia and amino acid supplements (conservative management). Many patients and families choose liver transplantation rather than conservative treatment; both alternatives are effective in reducing or normalizing blood ammonia. While liver transplantation eliminates the ammonia problem, conservative management does so only temporarily and in many patients, blood ammonia can rise during an infection.
The long-term objective of this study is to help patients make decisions about management alternatives (conservative vs. liver transplantation) by providing them with scientific information that is currently lacking. The questions the investigators will address are:
1. What is the disease's risk of mortality and illness in the two treatment approaches?
2. What can parents expect in terms of the development of their child and his/her school performance?
3. What are the expected effects of each treatment on short-term and long-term quality of life?
The investigators will use statistical methods to compare numbers or percentages of survival, illness, psychological testing for IQ, executive function, memory, behaviors, and quality of life among patients that choose conservative management and those who have chosen liver transplantation. Some of this information is already being collected by the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) in 14 metabolic clinics (11 of them in the US) as part of its long-term follow-up study. To ensure that the information the investigators analyze is representative of the UCD patient population in the US, the investigators will also obtain data from the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry, which collects information about children who undergo liver transplantation for many different diseases (including UCD).
The National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation (NUCDF) and the Patients' Research Working Group collaborated with the clinical investigators to design this research and to ensure that it that it covers the questions that are most important to patients and their families. The results of this study will be disseminated to patients, their doctors, and clinical staff so they receive current, validated information before making a decision about the best treatment for them.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Urea Cycle Disorder with Liver Transplant
* Age 18 and under
* Diagnosed with the following Neonatal-type urea cycle disorders: CPSD, OTCD, ASD or ALD
* History of liver transplant
No Intervention Given
Urea Cycle Disorder without Transplant
* Age 18 and under
* Diagnosed with the following Neonatal-type urea cycle disorders: CPSD, OTCD, ASD or ALD
* No history of liver transplant, managed medically
No Intervention Given
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No Intervention Given
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 and under
* Diagnosed with the following Neonatal-type urea cycle disorders:
* CPSD, OTCD, ASD or ALD, as defined as follows:
* Diagnosis of CPS I deficiency, defined as decreased (less than 20 % of control) CPS I enzyme activity in liver, and/or an identified pathogenic mutation, and/or hyperammonemia and first-degree relative meets at least one of the criteria for CPS I deficiency
* Diagnosis of OTC deficiency, defined as the identification of a pathogenic mutation, and/or less than 20% of control of OTC activity in the liver, and/or elevated urinary orotate (greater than 20 uM/mM) in a random urine sample or after allopurinol challenge test, and/or hyperammonemia and first degree relative meets at least one of the criteria for OTC deficiency
* Diagnosis of AS deficiency (Citrullinemia), defined as a greater than or equal to 10-fold elevation of citrulline in plasma, and/or decreased (less than 20% of control) AS enzyme activity in cultured skin fibroblasts or other appropriate tissue, and/or identification of a pathogenic mutation in the AS gene, and/or hyperammonemia and first degree relative meets at least one of the criteria for AS Deficiency
* Diagnosis of AL deficiency (Argininosuccinic Aciduria, ASA), defined as the presence of argininosuccinic acid in the blood or urine, and/or decreased (less than 20% of control) AL enzyme activity in cultured skin fibroblasts or other appropriate tissue, and/or identification of a pathogenic mutation in the AL gene, and/or hyperammonemia and first degree relative meets at least one of the criteria for AL Deficiency
* Willing to participate in at least 1 neurocognitive assessment and 1 quality of life assessment
* Permit access to medical records and medical providers
Exclusion Criteria
* Rare and unrelated comorbidities (e.g., Down's syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage in the newborn period, and extreme prematurity)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
NIH
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
George Washington University
OTHER
The National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation
UNKNOWN
Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation
UNKNOWN
Children's National Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicholas Ah Mew
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mendel Tuchman, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Children's National Research Institute
Nicholas Ah Mew, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's National Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Childrens Research Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.