Sonographic Examination Cubital Tunnel Release

NCT ID: NCT02739945

Last Updated: 2016-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators want to compare changes in cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow after open release or endoscopic release.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators want to compare changes in CSA of the ulnar nerve at the elbow hypothesizing that US examination is a useful tool to detect unsuccessful release and defining which technique shows the best outcome in the first year postoperatively.

The measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) as a diagnostic tool to detect entrapments syndrome in upper limbs has already been described. US typically demonstrates an abrupt narrowing and displacement of the nerve within the tunnel, possibly in association with a thickened retinaculum or a space-occupying lesions. Previous studies prospectively compared sonographic outcomes after decompression of the median nerve at the wrist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ulnar Nerve Compression, Cubital Tunnel

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open cubital tunnel release

In situ decompression (MacKinnon and Novak 2005) is made through a 6-10 cm longitudinal incision along the course of the ulnar nerve midway between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon.

Group Type OTHER

Cubital tunnel release

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ulnar nerve is decompressed proximally at the intramuscular septum, decompressed more distally through the cubital tunnel and then exposed between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. Care is taken to ensure that any point that might compress the ulnar nerve either proximally or distally is evaluated.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel release

Endoscopic release follows Hoffmann's technique (Hoffmann 2006) that demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this technique in a cadaveric model and in a clinical study.

Group Type OTHER

Cubital tunnel release

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ulnar nerve is decompressed proximally at the intramuscular septum, decompressed more distally through the cubital tunnel and then exposed between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. Care is taken to ensure that any point that might compress the ulnar nerve either proximally or distally is evaluated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cubital tunnel release

The ulnar nerve is decompressed proximally at the intramuscular septum, decompressed more distally through the cubital tunnel and then exposed between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. Care is taken to ensure that any point that might compress the ulnar nerve either proximally or distally is evaluated.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* history of paresthesia or numbness in the ulnar nerve distribution;
* weakness or wasting of the small muscles of the hand;
* a positive elbow flexion provocation test;
* slowed motor conduction velocity in the ulnar nerve below 50 m/sec.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with normal nerve conduction studies;
* prior surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome;
* prior traumatic lesions of the elbow;
* coexistent neurological diseases;
* bone anormalities (cubitus valgus, deformities from previous elbow fractures, osteoarthritis with medial osteophytes ands loose bodies, heterotopic ossifications);
* subluxating ulnar nerve;
* space-occupying soft-tissue lesions.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marco Guidi

Dr., MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Lucchina, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr.Lucchina Stefano

Locarno, Canton Ticino, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Puig S, Turkof E, Sedivy R, Ciovica R, Lang S, Kainberger FM. Sonographic diagnosis of recurrent ulnar nerve compression by ganglion cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Jun;18(6):433-6. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.6.433. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10361850 (View on PubMed)

Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Derchi LE. Ultrasonography of peripheral nerves. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000 Jun;21(3):205-13. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2171(00)90043-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10994689 (View on PubMed)

Okamoto M, Abe M, Shirai H, Ueda N. Diagnostic ultrasonography of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Oct;25(5):499-502. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0350.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10991822 (View on PubMed)

Watts AC, Bain GI. Patient-rated outcome of ulnar nerve decompression: a comparison of endoscopic and open in situ decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Oct;34(8):1492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.014. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19695795 (View on PubMed)

Hoffmann R, Siemionow M. The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2006 Feb;31(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16225971 (View on PubMed)

King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC, Woo SL. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):351-4. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90159-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10472009 (View on PubMed)

Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Cheng SP, Hsu CC, Chan RC, Tiu CM, Teng MM, Chang CY. Cubital tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by high-resolution ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1998 Oct;17(10):643-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.10.643.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9771609 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EnteOC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.