Zoledronic Acid Compared to Percutaneous Treatment in Osteoid Osteoma
NCT ID: NCT02739555
Last Updated: 2022-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-23
2019-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT02781324
Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
NCT00529997
Investigating Proprioceptive Impairment in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) (SCOLIO-PROPRIO)
NCT07208929
Comparison of the Order of Treatment in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02103543
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Spinal Stenosis
NCT00022776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The clinical success rate using these techniques is 96% at 6-month, 94% at 24-month. However, the technique is not distributed everywhere since it is performed by highly specialized interventional radiologists. The PT is performed under general, spinal or regional anesthesia. General anesthesia is used in most cases, especially in children. When the OO is located in close proximity to the skin, cartilage, vessels and nerves, severe complications may occur and additional procedures such as infusion of saline or injection of CO2 at the interface between the OO and the vulnerable structure are done. Also few anatomic locations are not accessible to a PT.
The natural history of OOs remains poorly understood. However investigators in small series of conservatively treated OOs suggested a spontaneous healing of the lesion with mineralization of the nidus and resolution of pain (mean duration of pain in patients with NSAID treatment: 33 months NSAID).
The efficacy of bisphosphonates on pain related to benign (Langherhans cell histiocytosis, fibrous dysplasia, Paget disease) or malignant bone lesions has been widely reported. The investigators observed such efficacy in a small series of 20 patients with percutaneously hard-to-reach or recurrent OO using one to three infusions of zoledronate. The clinical efficacy assessed on pain relief was accompanied by a significantly increased mineralization of the nidus. The investigators postulated that bisphosphonates had accelerated the natural history of OO.
Our hypothesis is that three infusions of zoledronate (4mg) repeated monthly in patients with symptomatic OO is non-inferior to percutaneous treatment on the efficacy, measured by pain relief at Visual Analogical Scale (VAS).
The main objective of this randomized study is to demonstrate that in patients with OO, treatment with three intravenous cycles of 4mg of zoledronic acid administered monthly, is non-inferior to treatment with percutaneous thermal ablation on the efficacy measured by the percentage of pain relief between baseline and end of treatment.
NB: Patients for whom the OO would not be percutaneously accessible (that is to say when the percutaneous treatment or surgical excision destruction expose the patient to a substantial risk in terms of neurologic or joint damages) will be offered to participate in a cohort, only in Lariboisière and Cochin hospital in Paris. In the cohort, the clinical follow-up will be conducted as it is currently proposed in Laribosisière hospital (no act added by the research). Objectives of the register will be explained to the patient. It consists in collecting anonymized medical data after a bisphosphonate treatment to statuate on the efficacy of the bisphosphonates to relieve pain due to osteoid osteoma.
Study design of the randomized study:
* Selection / Inclusion visit: verification of eligibility, randomization and recollection of patient consent.
* Intervention:
* percutaneous thermal ablation at V1 visit (i.e. maximum one month after the selection / inclusion visit)
* or three zoledronic acid infusions at V1, V2 (one month after v1) and V3 visits (one month after V2)
* V4 visit at 4 months (end of treatment, evaluation of the main outcome) and V7 visit at 16 months (end of study, evaluation of the secondary outcomes).
* Option: One to 3 additional visits (V4, V5 and V6) for zoledronic acid infusion can be proposed to the patient, depending on the efficacy of the previous infusion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1: Percutaneous treatment
Percutaneous treatment of OO is a thermal tumor destruction by radiofrequency or laser photocoagulation performed under CT control with strict aseptic approach and most often under general anesthesia. The introductive needle is inserted toward the nidus. Then the optic fiber or the radiofrequency probe is inserted in the nidus center and thermal destruction of the tumor is obtained.When the distance between the nidus and a nerve or the skin is less than 10 mm, infusion of normal saline or CO2 is introduced as spacing agent. When the nidus is in the subchondral bone, cold normal saline is introduced in the joint to protect the cartilage. In addition, a thermocouple is placed in the epidural or foraminal space to continuously monitor the temperature. A procedure typically required between 1 and 2 h from the time the patient entered the CT unit.
Thermal destruction with radiofrequency or laser
2: Bisphosphonate treatment
The treatment consists of 3 infusions of zoledronic acid administered at a monthly interval. Bisphosphonate treatment is considered finished 1 month after the third bisphosphonate infusion (V4 visit). In few cases, the analgesic efficacy provided by 3 bisphosphonate infusions cannot be sufficient: 1 to 3 additional infusions could be proposed to the patient.
Zoledronic acid is supplied as a 4 mg/100 ml solution for infusion. It will be administered as infusion over 30 minutes under the supervision of a nurse. Adults will receive intravenous infusion of 4 mg of zoledronic acid. Children will receive infusion of 0.025 mg/kg of zoledronic acid.
The investigators propose abacus corresponding to zoledronic acid volume to infuse during 30 minutes for children.
Acide Zoledronique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thermal destruction with radiofrequency or laser
Acide Zoledronique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with a typical osteoid osteoma diagnosed on clinical and radiological criteria (MRI and scanner), validated by a binomial clinician / radiologist.
* OO never treated or in treatment failure, or recurrent OO.
* OO percutaneously accessible
* Pain intensity is superior or equal to 40 mm on a VAS at inclusion visit.
* Written informed consent signed by the patient or his representative (for minors, agreement of the child and signature of the two mandatory parents).
* Patient affiliated to the social security.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients suffering from renal failure (i.e. lower than 60 ml/min according to the Cowcroft equation).
* Patients with severe hepatocellular insufficiency (TP\<50%).
* Patients with a history of iritis or uveitis.
* Patient with untreated rickets or osteomalacia.
* Patient with untreated dental infection or planed dental surgery during the study period.
* Patient with untreated infection of the external auditory canal (ex: furuncle, eczema superinfection)
* Patient already treated by bisphosphonates.
* Patients with hypersensitivity to the active substance, to other bisphosphonates or to any of the excipients (List of excipients: mannitol (E421), sodium citrate (E331), water for injections).
* Patient enrolled in another biomedical research protocol and during the whole study
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or planning pregnancy during the course of the study
* Women of child bearing potential (women following menarche and until post-menopause) and sexually active, without an effective contraceptive measure during the period of treatment (hormonal contraception or mechanical contraception)\*
\* Oral contraceptive methods include:
* combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravagina or transdermal)
* progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravagina or transdermal).
* Mechanical methods of contraception include intrauterine device and intrauterine hormone-releasing system.Patient enrolled in another biomedical research protocol and during the whole study
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Valérie BOUSSON, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hopital PELLEGRIN - Service d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle de l'adulte
Bordeaux, , France
Hopital PELLEGRIN - Service rhumatologie
Bordeaux, , France
Hôpital ROGER SALENGRO - Service d'Orthopédie A
Lille, , France
Hôpital ROGER SALENGRO - Radiologie et imagerie musculo-squelettique
Lille, , France
Hôpital ROGER SALENGRO - Rhumatologie
Lille, , France
Hôpital LAPEYRONIE - Imagerie médicale
Montpellier, , France
Hôpital LAPEYRONIE - Service Rhumatologie
Montpellier, , France
CHU Nancy - Imagerie Guilloz
Nancy, , France
Hôpital LARIBOSISIERE - Service radiologie ostéo-articulaire
Paris, , France
Hôpital LARIBOSISIERE - Service rhumatologie
Paris, , France
Hôpital COCHIN - Service radiologie B
Paris, , France
Hôpital COCHIN - Service rhumatologie B
Paris, , France
Hopital SUD - Service Radiologie
Rennes, , France
Hôpital SUD - Service rhumatologie
Rennes, , France
Hôpital PURPAN - Serice Radiologie
Toulouse, , France
Hôpital PURPAN - Serice Rhumatologie
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-001698-41
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P140909
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.