Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of New Generation Antiepileptic Drugs

NCT ID: NCT02739282

Last Updated: 2019-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

151 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2019-01-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim at studying therapeutic drug monitoring of newer generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in people with epilepsy, using state of the art Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry:

* to assess the tangible benefit of individualising therapy through therapeutic drug monitoring in term of clinical response and adverse events
* to assess the reliability and added value of salivary therapeutic drug monitoring This will be assessed through a randomised trial of either systematic or rescue therapeutic drug monitoring in people requiring treatment adjustment; outcome will be assessed in term of tolerance and treatment response in a survival analysis to assess the benefit of systematic therapeutic drug monitoring. For each blood samples taken in those studies, a saliva probe will be collected and its reliability ascertained retrospectively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim to explore if systematic follow-up of newer generation serum antiepileptic drugs levels can provide a tangible benefit in the care of people with epilepsy. "Systematic therapeutic drug monitoring" performed at each clinic consultation and automatically transmitted to the clinician will be compared with clinically required therapeutic drug monitoring ("rescue therapeutic drug monitoring", transmitted only in case of predefined inefficacy or tolerance problems, as defined in the combine endpoint below), to assess if systematic therapeutic drug monitoring can prevent a proportion of treatment failure or adverse events. In the "rescue therapeutic drug monitoring" arm, communication of levels results will only be provided if a study endpoint (treatment failure or side effect as discussed below) is reached. This design has been previously successfully used by our group in an oncological setting. A combined endpoint will be used accounting for both efficacy and adverse events; occurrence of any of those events will be considered as an endpoint: 2 seizures with impaired consciousness, status epilepticus (defined as any seizure lasting \>5 minutes), need of an add-on antiepileptic drugs, need to discontinue the study drug (lack of efficacy or adverse reactions) or hospital admission.

You will be included if you have epilepsy followed in our epilepsy outpatient clinic, on newer generation antiepileptic drugs, and requiring treatment adjustment because of inefficacy or tolerance problem. Pregnant women in whom therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended will be excluded. Outcome will be measured by the occurrence of a composite endpoint including inefficacy or treatment and emergent adverse events.

The study power would certainly have been maximal for a trial comparing therapeutic drug monitoring-based dosage individualization to a complete abstention from TDM. However, according to our experience, the mere existence of analytical services makes it difficult to deny access to certain patients on the argument that they belong to a control group, raising ethical concerns in case of perceived need for measurement in potentially worrying clinical conditions. Therefore, this study adopts a pragmatic approach, aiming to compare a routine a priori adjustment of newer generation antiepileptic drugs dosage based on therapeutic drug monitoring with a selective a posteriori offer for therapeutic drug monitoring services in case of clinical problems (such as insufficient response, or suspicion of medication toxicity). It is conceivable that such a design could lower the risk of bias favouring therapeutic drug monitoring, as prescribers willing to obtain measurement results in patients from the control group may be subtly incited to notify more easily the occurrence of clinical problems in this group. The endpoint will be however well defined to minimise this potential bias.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Systematic therapeutic drug monitoring

"Systematic therapeutic drug monitoring" performed at each clinic consultation and automatically transmitted to the clinician will be compared with clinically required therapeutic drug monitoring ("rescue therapeutic drug monitoring", transmitted only in case of predefined inefficacy or tolerance problems, as defined in the combine endpoint below), to assess if systematic therapeutic drug monitoring can prevent a proportion of treatment failure or adverse events.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Systematic therapeutic drug monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood samples with antiepileptic drug level measurement

"Rescue" therapeutic drug monitoring

In the "rescue therapeutic drug monitoring" arm, communication of levels results will only be provided if a study endpoint (treatment failure or side effect as discussed below) is reached.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Systematic therapeutic drug monitoring

Blood samples with antiepileptic drug level measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* People with epilepsy
* On newer generation antiepileptic drugs
* Need to adjust the medication

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr Jan Novy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Jan Novy

Médecin associé

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Novy, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHUV

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-00079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.