Misoprostol Versus Effox as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior Surgical Evacuation

NCT ID: NCT02738177

Last Updated: 2016-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ninety healthy pregnant women candidate for surgical evacuation after confirming 1st trimester pregnancy loss were enrolled in the study. They were randomized in three groups; misoprostol group in which 30 candidates were receive 2 tablets of misoprostol (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation, Effox group in which 30 candidates were received 2 tablets of Effox (i.e 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation \& combination therapy group in which 30 candidates were received 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug \& 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation. For all participants, the route of administration was the intravaginal route 1ry outcomes included cervical consistency \& dilatation immediately before the procedure. 2ry outcomes included total duration of the operation and the occurrence of drug-related side effects

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the individual use of Misoprostol or Effox or their combination as cervical ripening agents in cases with 1st trimesteric pregnancy loss candidate for surgical evacuation.

Study Design: A randomized Single-blind comparative study. Setting: The Obstetrics and Gynecology casuality department of Kasr El Aini hospital (Cairo University - Egypt) in the period from November 2015 to June 2016.

Methodology: ninety healthy pregnant women candidate for surgical evacuation after confirming 1st trimester pregnancy loss were enrolled in the study. They were randomized in three groups; misoprostol group in which 30 candidates were receive 2 tablets of misoprostol (PGE1) 200ug (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation, Effox group in which 30 candidates were received 2 tablets of Effox (Isosorbide mononitrate) 20 mg (i.e 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation \& combination therapy group in which 30 candidates were received 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug \& 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation. The study was approved by the Hospital Ethical Committee. Informed consents were obtained from all participants after explanation of the aim of the study \& the potential adverse effects. The study was not supported by any pharmacological company.

Inclusion criteria included maternal age 18-40 years, 1st trimesteric pregnancy loss with gestational age 12 weeks or less (diagnosis was confirmed using transvaginal ultrasound according to the following criteria: Crown-rump length {CRL} of 7 mm or more and no heartbeat, Mean sac diameter {MSD} of 25 mm or more and no embryo, absence of embryo with heartbeat 2 wk or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac and absence of embryo with heartbeat 11 days or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac)\* \& closed firm cervix. Exclusion criteria included evidence suggesting spontaneous onset of abortion (vaginal bleeding or and uterine cramps), previous trial to induce abortion or the use of any cervical ripening agent during the current pregnancy, presence or suspicion of septic abortion (fever \> 38 C, offensive vaginal discharge \& leukocytosis), Uterine anomalies or history of any cervical surgery or manipulation. For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination (including cervical assessment), transvaginal ultrasound (to confirm early pregnancy loss) \& routine preoperative investigation. Patient is then randomized to one of the three groups (using computer generated random numbers) and accordingly the investigator gave her either 2 tablets of misoprostol 200ug (misoprostol group) or 2 tablets of Effox 20 mg (Effox group) or 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug \& 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg (Combination therapy group). For all participants, the route of administration was the intravaginal route (tablets were places high up in the posterior fornix of the vagina. Only patients were blinded to the nature of the tablets. 4 hrs later, the patient was admitted to the operating room for surgical evacuation with the following technique: under general anesthesia \& after assessment of cervical consistency (soft or firm) \& dilatation (tested by the number of the largest Hegar's dilator passed without resistance), ultrasound-guided suction evacuation was done followed by fine curettage using the appropriate size curette. All participants were monitored for any changes in vital signs (every hour), occurrence of headache \& severe abdominal cramps since the onset of drug administration till 6 hours postoperative. 1ry outcomes included cervical consistency \& dilatation immediately before the procedure. 2ry outcomes included total duration of the operation and the occurrence of drug-related side effects namely high temperature (38 or more) and severe abdominal pain for the misoprostol or headache and low blood pressure for the Effox.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Ripening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

misoprostol group

30 candidates were receive 2 tablets of misoprostol (PGE1) 200ug (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

2 tablets of misoprostol (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (misoprostol group)

Effox group

30 candidates were received 2 tablets of Effox (Isosorbide mononitrate) 20 mg (i.e 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate

Intervention Type DRUG

2 tablets of Effox (i.e. 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (effox group)

combination therapy group

30 candidates were received 1 tablets of misoprostol 200ug \& 1 tablets of Effox 20 mg 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

misoprostol and Isosorbide-5-mononitrate

Intervention Type DRUG

1tablets of misoprostol (i.e.200 ug) \& 1 tablets of Effox (i.e. 20 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (combination therapy group)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Misoprostol

2 tablets of misoprostol (i.e. 400 ug) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (misoprostol group)

Intervention Type DRUG

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate

2 tablets of Effox (i.e. 40 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (effox group)

Intervention Type DRUG

misoprostol and Isosorbide-5-mononitrate

1tablets of misoprostol (i.e.200 ug) \& 1 tablets of Effox (i.e. 20 mg) 4 hrs prior to surgical evacuation high up in the posterior fornix (combination therapy group)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mesotac cytotec Effox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy pregnant women candidate for surgical evacuation
* 1st trimesteric pregnancy loss with gestational age 12 weeks or less (diagnosis was confirmed using transvaginal ultrasound according to the following criteria: Crown-rump length {CRL} of 7 mm or more and no heartbeat, Mean sac diameter {MSD} of 25 mm or more and no embryo, absence of embryo with heartbeat 2 wk or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac and absence of embryo with heartbeat 11 days or more after a scan that showed a gestational sac with a yolk sac)
* closed and firm cervix

Exclusion Criteria

* evidence suggesting spontaneous onset of abortion (vaginal bleeding or and uterine cramps), previous trial to induce abortion or the use of any cervical ripening agent during the current pregnancy, presence or suspicion of septic abortion (fever \> 38 degree Centigrade, offensive vaginal discharge \& leukocytosis), Uterine anomalies or history of any cervical surgery or manipulation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Moutaz Sherbini

lecturer of obs& gyn

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Moutaz Elsherbini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lecturer of obs & gyn

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kasr Elainy Hospital (Cairo University)

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

moutaz elsherbini, MD

Role: CONTACT

(+2) 01001588300

omneya helal, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

moutaz elsherbini, MD

Role: primary

(+2)01001588300

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17480

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 RECRUITING PHASE1