Web-based Validation Pelvic Floor Questionnaires

NCT ID: NCT02724891

Last Updated: 2019-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient-reported outcomes are commonly used in healthcare. Examples include validated symptom-based questionnaires and health diaries. In the field of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery there are many questionnaires and diaries that have been validated for a paper-based administration. As technology is incorporated into delivery of medical care and research, investigators need to consider how to collect data electronically while ensuring that this new format is equivalent to the paper questionnaires they rely on. In this study, the investigators aim to validate a series of validated questionnaires and symptom diaries administered via the web and smartphone for a more streamlined care for the patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Health questionnaires and health diaries are two forms of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) commonly used in healthcare. Health questionnaires are often used as intake logs, discerning and recording the symptoms and severity of a problem at the time of presentation. Health diaries, in contrast, are ongoing logs which allow for mindful attention to symptoms and monitoring of response to therapy. Unfortunately, both types of PRO forms are often under-utilized or uninterpretable because they are collected on paper. Within urogynecology, PRO scales such as the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Bristol Stool Chart, Bladder Diaries and others are used ubiquitously. Their impact, however, is diminished by poor compliance and recall bias. The move towards electronic PRO measures would be endorsed by patients (who can track and interact with their data), physicians (who can track progress and study group outcomes) and by regulators (who want to ensure accurate and reproducible data collection). Electronic PRO tools, particularly on the patient's own device, would allow for increased rate of reporting through mobile availability, time stamping of data to prevent recall bias and reduction in data entry mistakes and costs.

Study Procedures After informed consent is obtained, demographic data will be collected. Subjects will be administered the questionnaires either in paper or web-based or smartphone form based on a random number block scheme. At least two weeks later but prior to treatment they will complete the other form of the questionnaire. This can occur at their next office visit or can be completed at home. Subjects will be emailed and/or called by research staff to remind them to complete the second set of questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1 paper form first

paper questionnaires first then web/smart phone questionnaires after a 2-week washout period

paper form

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaires in paper form

web/smartphone form

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaires in web/smartphone

Arm 2 web/smartphone form first

web/smart phone questionnaires first then paper questionnaires after a 2-week washout period

paper form

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaires in paper form

web/smartphone form

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaires in web/smartphone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

paper form

questionnaires in paper form

Intervention Type OTHER

web/smartphone form

questionnaires in web/smartphone

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women at least 18 years of age presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to repeat questionnaires or return to the office in 2 weeks
* No access to computer/web or smartphone
* Pregnancy (as gestational age will advance during 2 week time interval and symptoms may change)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cara Grimes, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arkansas

Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grimes CL, Antosh DD, Oliphant S, Yurteri-Kaplan L, Kim-Fine S, Melamud G, Heisler C, Chung DE; Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS). Correlation of Electronic (Web-Based and Smartphone) Administration of Measures of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;26(6):396-400. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000713.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30889034 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAO8451

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Digital Care Programs for Female Pelvic Health
NCT05513417 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION