Comparison of Different Massage Techniques Plus Conservative Applications in Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT02714803

Last Updated: 2016-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare of different massage techniques plus conservative aplications in low back pain treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Connective tissue massage group

Connective tissue massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

"Connective tissue massage" and "Conservative applications"

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Connective tissue massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Classic massage group

Classic massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

"Classic massage group" and "Conservative applications"

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Classic massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Sham massage group

Sham massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

"Sham massage group" and "Conservative applications"

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

"Connective tissue massage" and "Conservative applications"

Connective tissue massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

"Classic massage group" and "Conservative applications"

Classic massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

"Sham massage group" and "Conservative applications"

Sham massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having non specific low back pain without any relevant ongoing pathologies such as disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, fractures, tumor, osteoporosis, infection
* Willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Spinal surgery in the past 6 months or having to undergo surgery or invasive examinations during the study;
* neurological disease;
* psychiatric disease;
* serious chronic disease that could interfere with the outcomes (e.g., cardiovascular disease, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis),
* pregnant during the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ataturk Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seyda TOPRAK CELENAY

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ataturk Training and Research Hospital

Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-11/33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Effects of Music on Neck Pain
NCT06285383 COMPLETED NA
Manual Therapy Behavior Scale in Physiotherapists
NCT07296380 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Comparison of Two Different Fascial Treatments
NCT06715969 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA