Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gait Improvement in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT02711319
Last Updated: 2016-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of a Novel Strategy to Analyze the Effect on Gait Using Transcutaneous Spinal Current Stimulation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injured Patients
NCT07289191
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Robotic Therapy
NCT05210166
RTsMS and Body Weight-support Treadmill Training After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06886308
Association Between tDCS and Lokomat Training in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02562001
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Lower Limb Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
NCT02747914
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Physical therapy aims to improve function of both undamaged and also, as far as possible, damaged neuronal structures. However, 'reorganization' of neuronal circuits is the target of specific training approaches. Therefore, the challenge is to guide CNS plasticity in order to optimize the functional outcome for a given individual. Hypothesized was that high-frequency rTMS coupled with gait training can improve motor recovery in the lower extremities and locomotion in incomplete SCI patients to a greater degree than sham stimulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
active (real) rTMS (ACTIVE GROUP)
The patients were randomly distributed in two study groups: real or sham rTMS group.
For real rTMS, we applied 2 seconds duration bursts of 20 Hz (40 pulses/burst) with intertrain intervals of 28 seconds, for a total of 1800 pulses over 20 minutes.
rTMS
For real (active) rTMS, we applied 2 seconds duration bursts of 20 Hz (40 pulses/burst) with intertrain intervals of 28 seconds, for a total of 1800 pulses over 20 minutes
sham rTMS (SHAM GROUP)
For sham rTMS, the double cone coil was again held over the vertex, but it was disconnected from the main stimulator unit. Instead, a second coil (8-shaped) was connected to the MagStim stimulator, and discharged under the patient's pillow (2).
sham rTMS
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS (SHAM GROUP)
For sham rTMS, the double cone coil was again held over the vertex, but it was disconnected from the main stimulator unit. Instead, a second coil (8-shaped) was connected to the MagStim stimulator, and discharged under the patient's pillow (2).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS
For real (active) rTMS, we applied 2 seconds duration bursts of 20 Hz (40 pulses/burst) with intertrain intervals of 28 seconds, for a total of 1800 pulses over 20 minutes
sham rTMS
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS (SHAM GROUP)
For sham rTMS, the double cone coil was again held over the vertex, but it was disconnected from the main stimulator unit. Instead, a second coil (8-shaped) was connected to the MagStim stimulator, and discharged under the patient's pillow (2).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. candidate for gait rehabilitation with LokomatĀ® after cervical or thoracic SCI;
3. stable medical treatment at least one week before and during the study;
4. without limitation of passive range of movement in joints
5. agreed to participate after signing a written informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. severe spasticity (MAS\>=3)
3. disagreed to sign consent form
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
OTHER_GOV
Institut Guttmann
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joan Vidal
MD, PhD
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PI10/00442
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.