Apatinib for Advanced Osteosarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02711007
Last Updated: 2018-04-23
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
PHASE2/PHASE3
Total Enrollment
37 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2016-03-31
Study Completion Date
2018-01-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After standard multimodal therapy, the prognosis of relapsed and unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma is dismal and unchanged over the last decades.Thus, the investigators explored apatinib activity in patients with relapsed and unresectable osteosarcoma after the failure of first-line or second-line chemotherapy. Patients \>16 years, progressing after standard treatment, were eligible to receive 500 mg or 750 mg of apatinib once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were PFS, overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as no progression at 6 months and safety.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Apatinib Plus Anti-PD1 Therapy for Advanced Osteosarcoma
NCT03359018
Progression-free Survival
Overall Survival
Clinical Benefit Rate
+1 more
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Apatinib Second Line Treatment for Advanced Osteosarcoma and Soft Tissue Sarcomas ,Openting ,Single Center, One-armed Clinical Study.
NCT03163381
Osteosarcoma, Advanced
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Apatinib in Advanced Non-squamous，NSCLC
NCT03376191
Non-squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
UNKNOWN
Apatinib With Ifosfamide Plus Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma (OAIE)
NCT05277480
Effect of Drug
Drug
Toxicity
COMPLETED
PHASE2
The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Combined With Etoposide in Heavily Pretreated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02733107
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients
Eligible patients should have the following characteristics: age \>16 years; diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma confirmed histologically and reviewed centrally; prior treatment (completed \>4 weeks before trial entry) consisted of standard high-grade osteosarcoma chemotherapy agents including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, and ifosfamide; metastatic relapsed and unresectable progressive disease (PD); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 with a life expectancy \>3 months; adequate renal, hepatic, and hemopoietic function. Additionally, the investigators require normal or controlled blood pressure, as well as surgery and/or radiotherapy completion at least 1 month before enrollment. All enrolled patients showed radiological evidence of disease progression and the lesion could be evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 before treatment start.
Treatment
Patients are planned to be treated with a dose of apatinib 500 mg(BSA ≤1.5) or 750mg(BSA\>1.5) once daily. The dose was reduced or temporarily suspended according to predefined rules and after considering any observed toxicity, which was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Following adverse event resolution, apatinib can be restarted at the maximally tolerated dose and continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The study was approved by participating hospital review boards, and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Each patient provided written informed consent.
Efficacy Assessment
Before starting treatment, patients should be staged with chest and abdomen computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (whenever indicated by the clinical situation). And all those patients should be tested by Immunohistochemistry of the VEGFR-2 over-expression of the paraffin embedded samples of the lesion or mRNA testing VEGFR-2 over-expression of the fresh specimen. Baseline assessment included also full blood count, serum chemistry, electrocardiogram and physical examination. In light of its potential role in osteosarcoma response assessment, \[18F\]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is suggested but not mandated for patient enrollment, and its impact on tumor response assessment was purely exploratory. All tests were repeated after 2 months and, thereafter, at 2-month intervals unless there were toxic effects or disease progression suspicion. Response was assessed by CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1. Thus, both complete and partial remission needed confirmation within 4 weeks of when a response was first demonstrated. Stable disease (SD) was confirmed after a minimum of 8 weeks. The investigators thoroughly probe for and record any sign(s) of treatment-induced improvement, be it minor response (MR) as tumor shrinkage \<30%, and/or nondimensional tumor responses including Hounsfield unit measured tissue density changes or osteoid matrix calcification.
The primary end point progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months is calculated from the date of treatment start until the time of disease progression or death, whichever came first. Patients alive and free from progression would be censored. Secondary end points included the following: PFS; OS; overall response rate, defined as complete responses (CRs) + partial responses (PRs) + MRs; disease control rate (overall response rate + SDs); patterns of nondimensional response; clinical benefit rate (CBR) (PFS rate at 4 months) and duration of response. Duration of response is calculated from the day of first response assessment until either progression/death (event) or last day of follow-up (censored). Last, the investigators evaluate any clinical improvement by means of the Pain Analgesic Score via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score form that was filled in by patients themselves. Analgesic medication use was recorded according to the analgesic score: 0 = none; 1 = minor analgesics; 2 = tranquillizers, antidepressants, muscle relaxants and steroids; 3 = mild narcotics; 4 = strong narcotics.
Eligible patients should have the following characteristics: age \>16 years; diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma confirmed histologically and reviewed centrally; prior treatment (completed \>4 weeks before trial entry) consisted of standard high-grade osteosarcoma chemotherapy agents including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, and ifosfamide; metastatic relapsed and unresectable progressive disease (PD); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 with a life expectancy \>3 months; adequate renal, hepatic, and hemopoietic function. Additionally, the investigators require normal or controlled blood pressure, as well as surgery and/or radiotherapy completion at least 1 month before enrollment. All enrolled patients showed radiological evidence of disease progression and the lesion could be evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 before treatment start.
Treatment
Patients are planned to be treated with a dose of apatinib 500 mg(BSA ≤1.5) or 750mg(BSA\>1.5) once daily. The dose was reduced or temporarily suspended according to predefined rules and after considering any observed toxicity, which was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Following adverse event resolution, apatinib can be restarted at the maximally tolerated dose and continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The study was approved by participating hospital review boards, and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Each patient provided written informed consent.
Efficacy Assessment
Before starting treatment, patients should be staged with chest and abdomen computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (whenever indicated by the clinical situation). And all those patients should be tested by Immunohistochemistry of the VEGFR-2 over-expression of the paraffin embedded samples of the lesion or mRNA testing VEGFR-2 over-expression of the fresh specimen. Baseline assessment included also full blood count, serum chemistry, electrocardiogram and physical examination. In light of its potential role in osteosarcoma response assessment, \[18F\]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is suggested but not mandated for patient enrollment, and its impact on tumor response assessment was purely exploratory. All tests were repeated after 2 months and, thereafter, at 2-month intervals unless there were toxic effects or disease progression suspicion. Response was assessed by CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1. Thus, both complete and partial remission needed confirmation within 4 weeks of when a response was first demonstrated. Stable disease (SD) was confirmed after a minimum of 8 weeks. The investigators thoroughly probe for and record any sign(s) of treatment-induced improvement, be it minor response (MR) as tumor shrinkage \<30%, and/or nondimensional tumor responses including Hounsfield unit measured tissue density changes or osteoid matrix calcification.
The primary end point progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months is calculated from the date of treatment start until the time of disease progression or death, whichever came first. Patients alive and free from progression would be censored. Secondary end points included the following: PFS; OS; overall response rate, defined as complete responses (CRs) + partial responses (PRs) + MRs; disease control rate (overall response rate + SDs); patterns of nondimensional response; clinical benefit rate (CBR) (PFS rate at 4 months) and duration of response. Duration of response is calculated from the day of first response assessment until either progression/death (event) or last day of follow-up (censored). Last, the investigators evaluate any clinical improvement by means of the Pain Analgesic Score via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score form that was filled in by patients themselves. Analgesic medication use was recorded according to the analgesic score: 0 = none; 1 = minor analgesics; 2 = tranquillizers, antidepressants, muscle relaxants and steroids; 3 = mild narcotics; 4 = strong narcotics.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Osteosarcoma
Metastasis
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
apatinib
apatinib 750mg tablet or 500mg tablet by mouth, Qd half an hour after dinner
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
apatinib
Intervention Type
DRUG
Apatinib is a small-molecule VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, similar to vatalanib (PTK787), but with a binding affinity 10 times that of vatalanib or sorafenib.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
apatinib
Apatinib is a small-molecule VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, similar to vatalanib (PTK787), but with a binding affinity 10 times that of vatalanib or sorafenib.
Intervention Type
DRUG
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age \>16 years;
* diagnosis confirmed histologically and reviewed centrally;
* prior treatment (completed \>4 weeks before trial entry) consisted of standard high-grade osteosarcoma chemotherapy agents including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high- dose methotrexate, and ifosfamide; metastatic relapsed and unresectable progressive disease (PD);
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 with a life expectancy \>3 months;
* adequate renal, hepatic, and hemopoietic function;
* normal or controlled blood pressure;
* surgery and/or radiotherapy completion at least 1 month before enrollment.
* diagnosis confirmed histologically and reviewed centrally;
* prior treatment (completed \>4 weeks before trial entry) consisted of standard high-grade osteosarcoma chemotherapy agents including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high- dose methotrexate, and ifosfamide; metastatic relapsed and unresectable progressive disease (PD);
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 with a life expectancy \>3 months;
* adequate renal, hepatic, and hemopoietic function;
* normal or controlled blood pressure;
* surgery and/or radiotherapy completion at least 1 month before enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria
* no pulmonary artery or venous tumor embolus;
* previously exposed to other TKIs;
* central nervous system metastasis;
* have had other kinds of malignant tumors at the same time;
* cardiac insufficiency or arrhythmia;
* uncontrolled complications, such as diabetes mellitus and so on;
* coagulation disorders;
* urine protein≥ ++;
* pleural or peritoneal effusion that needs to be handled by surgical treatment;
* combined with other infections or wounds.
* previously exposed to other TKIs;
* central nervous system metastasis;
* have had other kinds of malignant tumors at the same time;
* cardiac insufficiency or arrhythmia;
* uncontrolled complications, such as diabetes mellitus and so on;
* coagulation disorders;
* urine protein≥ ++;
* pleural or peritoneal effusion that needs to be handled by surgical treatment;
* combined with other infections or wounds.
Minimum Eligible Age
16 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GUO WEI
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
GUO WEI
The Director of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital and the Principal Investigator of this study
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Guo, M.D. Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Chinese Medical Association--Sarcoma group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
China
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bernthal NM, Federman N, Eilber FR, Nelson SD, Eckardt JJ, Eilber FC, Tap WD. Long-term results (>25 years) of a randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, operable osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2012 Dec 1;118(23):5888-93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27651. Epub 2012 May 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bielack S, Jurgens H, Jundt G, Kevric M, Kuhne T, Reichardt P, Zoubek A, Werner M, Winkelmann W, Kotz R. Osteosarcoma: the COSS experience. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:289-308. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kempf-Bielack B, Bielack SS, Jurgens H, Branscheid D, Berdel WE, Exner GU, Gobel U, Helmke K, Jundt G, Kabisch H, Kevric M, Klingebiel T, Kotz R, Maas R, Schwarz R, Semik M, Treuner J, Zoubek A, Winkler K. Osteosarcoma relapse after combined modality therapy: an analysis of unselected patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS). J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 20;23(3):559-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.063.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Chen J, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Surgical management and outcome of metachronous Krukenberg tumors from gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;87(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/jso.20072.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Nooy MA, Taminiau A, Kappetein AP, Huysmans HA. Pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with osteosarcoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5(8):406-9. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(91)90184-l.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thompson RC Jr, Cheng EY, Clohisy DR, Perentesis J, Manivel C, Le CT. Results of treatment for metastatic osteosarcoma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Apr;(397):240-7. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00028.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Navid F, Willert JR, McCarville MB, Furman W, Watkins A, Roberts W, Daw NC. Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma. Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):419-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23586.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Berger M, Grignani G, Ferrari S, Biasin E, Brach del Prever A, Aliberti S, Saglio F, Aglietta M, Fagioli F. Phase 2 trial of two courses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide for relapsed high-risk osteosarcoma patients. Cancer. 2009 Jul 1;115(13):2980-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24368.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Saylors RL 3rd, Stine KC, Sullivan J, Kepner JL, Wall DA, Bernstein ML, Harris MB, Hayashi R, Vietti TJ; Pediatric Oncology Group. Cyclophosphamide plus topotecan in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug 1;19(15):3463-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3463.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Miser JS, Kinsella TJ, Triche TJ, Tsokos M, Jarosinski P, Forquer R, Wesley R, Magrath I. Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and etoposide: an effective regimen in the treatment of recurrent sarcomas and other tumors of children and young adults. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Aug;5(8):1191-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.8.1191.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McNall-Knapp RY, Williams CN, Reeves EN, Heideman RL, Meyer WH. Extended phase I evaluation of vincristine, irinotecan, temozolomide, and antibiotic in children with refractory solid tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;54(7):909-15. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22460.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bomgaars LR, Bernstein M, Krailo M, Kadota R, Das S, Chen Z, Adamson PC, Blaney SM. Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4622-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6103.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cosetti M, Wexler LH, Calleja E, Trippett T, LaQuaglia M, Huvos AG, Gerald W, Healey JH, Meyers PA, Gorlick R. Irinotecan for pediatric solid tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Feb;24(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200202000-00009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Le Cesne A, Schlemmer M, Hohenberger P, van Oosterom AT, Blay JY, Leyvraz S, Stul M, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, Hagemeijer A, Judson I; EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group; Italian Sarcoma Group; Australasian GastroIntestinal Trials Group. KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(8):1093-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.030. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, Le Cesne A, Scurr M, Schoffski P, Collin F, Pandite L, Marreaud S, De Brauwer A, van Glabbeke M, Verweij J, Blay JY. Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3126-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3223. Epub 2009 May 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Linch M, Miah AB, Thway K, Judson IR, Benson C. Systemic treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma-gold standard and novel therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr;11(4):187-202. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.26. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Schoffski P, Cornillie J, Wozniak A, Li H, Hompes D. Soft tissue sarcoma: an update on systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Oncol Res Treat. 2014;37(6):355-62. doi: 10.1159/000362631. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Grignani G, Palmerini E, Dileo P, Asaftei SD, D'Ambrosio L, Pignochino Y, Mercuri M, Picci P, Fagioli F, Casali PG, Ferrari S, Aglietta M. A phase II trial of sorafenib in relapsed and unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma after failure of standard multimodal therapy: an Italian Sarcoma Group study. Ann Oncol. 2012 Feb;23(2):508-16. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr151. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yoo C, Lee J, Rha SY, Park KH, Kim TM, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Ahn JH. Multicenter phase II study of everolimus in patients with metastatic or recurrent bone and soft-tissue sarcomas after failure of anthracycline and ifosfamide. Invest New Drugs. 2013 Dec;31(6):1602-8. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-0028-7. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Grignani G, Palmerini E, Ferraresi V, D'Ambrosio L, Bertulli R, Asaftei SD, Tamburini A, Pignochino Y, Sangiolo D, Marchesi E, Capozzi F, Biagini R, Gambarotti M, Fagioli F, Casali PG, Picci P, Ferrari S, Aglietta M; Italian Sarcoma Group. Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):98-107. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71136-2. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lammli J, Fan M, Rosenthal HG, Patni M, Rinehart E, Vergara G, Ablah E, Wooley PH, Lucas G, Yang SY. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor correlates with the advance of clinical osteosarcoma. Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1629-z. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Li J, Qin S, Xu J, Guo W, Xiong J, Bai Y, Sun G, Yang Y, Wang L, Xu N, Cheng Y, Wang Z, Zheng L, Tao M, Zhu X, Ji D, Liu X, Yu H. Apatinib for chemotherapy-refractory advanced metastatic gastric cancer: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3219-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8585. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Aras M, Erdil TY, Dane F, Gungor S, Ones T, Dede F, Inanir S, Turoglu HT. Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1.1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors. Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jan;37(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000401.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Semiglazov V. RECIST for Response (Clinical and Imaging) in Neoadjuvant Clinical Trials in Operable Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2015 May;2015(51):21-3. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv021.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T, Jorgensen M, Gibbs P, Faragher I, Jones I, Currow D. Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Broderick JM, Hussey J, Kennedy MJ, O' Donnell DM. Patients over 65 years are assigned lower ECOG PS scores than younger patients, although objectively measured physical activity is no different. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Jan;5(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PKUPH-sarcoma
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Maintenance Treatment of Apatinib in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT03130270
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Maintenance Therapy of Apatinib After Chemoradiotherapy in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT03180476
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Apatinib + Ifosfamide and Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma
NCT04690231
COMPLETED
NA
Study of Apatinib as the Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma
NCT03376737
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Apatinib Combine With EGFR-TKI for Advanced EGFR-TKI-resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03050411
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
Compare Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy Drug Versus Chemotherapy Drug as Second-line Treatment in NSCLC
NCT03256721
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Study of Apatinib as Third-line and Later Therapy in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
NCT02995187
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
A Single-arm, Multicenter, Prospective Phase II Clinical Study of Apatinib in Combination With Adebrelimab and EC Regimen in the First-line Treatment of Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT06786312
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
Appatinib Combined With S-1 in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT04128800
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Apatinib as Second Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancers
NCT03144856
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
The Efficacy and Drug Resistance Molecular Biology of Apatinib Combined With EGFR-TK1 Treated for Advanced Slow-progressed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT03811054
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Monotherapy in Maintenance Treatment of Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
NCT03129698
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Afatinib Combined With Chemotherapy as Conversion Therapy in Unresectable EGFR Sensitive Mutation-positive Stage III NSCLC
NCT06709859
RECRUITING
PHASE2
S1403, Afatinib Dimaleate With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IV or Recurrent, EGFR Mutation Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02438722
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
Study of Apatinib in RET Fusion Positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02540824
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
A Study of Anti-PD-1 AK105 in Patients With Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03866980
TERMINATED
PHASE3
Study of Apatinib Plus Etoposide Capsule as the Therapy of Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03389087
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Apatinib and Camrelizumab in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With First-line Treatment Failure
NCT04586088
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Study of Apatinib as 3rd/4th Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Wild-type Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)
NCT02332512
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
A Study of Standard Treatment +/- Apatinib in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03100955
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
Apatinib Combine With Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC
NCT03201146
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib in Heavily Pretreated Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02515435
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Aumolertinib Versus Osimertinib As First-line Therapy for Patients with EGFR Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
NCT06752408
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2