Stroke Walking Explained After Trunk Training

NCT ID: NCT02708888

Last Updated: 2019-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of SWEAT² study is to further explore the effects of additional customized trunk exercises on clinical and biomechanical gait performance. Despite of the evidence demonstrating the importance of trunk control after stroke, studies about the effects of trunk rehabilitation on gait performance are inconsistent. The findings of this study might lead to new scientific insights in the importance of the trunk during gait rehabilitation in people suffering from stroke submitted to a rehabilitation hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To examine the effects of additional trunk exercises on gait performance via clinical and biomechanical assessments in patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.

Design: The design of this study is an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Prior to evaluation, participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental or control group by means of concealed envelopes. The number of patients required for this study was calculated a priori to ensure sufficient statistical power. Analysis showed that a sample size of 30 patients in each group was necessary to detect a difference (ES1) with 80 % using a two-tailed hypothesis (with significance of p=0.05).

Intervention: All patients will receive a multidisciplinary conventional stroke rehabilitation program provided by the rehabilitation staff. The control group will receive a series of cognitive exercises focusing on aspects of memory (visual, auditory, and working memory), attention (sustained attention and selective attention), and executive functioning (planning and problem-solving). The additional training of the trunk training group focuses on trunk muscle strength, coordination and selective movements. The training program will consist of task-specific movements of the upper and lower part of the trunk both in supine and sitting position on stable and unstable surfaces (physio balls). The following trunk exercises will be performed: bridging, reaching, lower/upper trunk rotations, lower/upper trunk lateral flexion, upper/lower trunk flexion, ...

Outcome measures:

1. Tinetti Test
2. Gait parameters recorded during 3D-Full body gait analysis:

Gait analysis was performed at the M²OCEAN movement analysis laboratory (Multidisciplinary Motor Centre Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Edegem). VICON analysis system (©Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., London, UK) which is the golden standard for 3D motion analysis. Eight infrared automated cameras (Vicon T10 cameras, 100 fps, 1 Megapixel) measured the 3D coordinates of reflective motion trackers. Two video cameras recorded the walking pattern of the participants in the sagittal and frontal plane. In addition, initial contact and toe off were measured based on the ankle trajectories of the reflective markers together with 3 AMTI type OR 6-7 force plates (1000 fps, 46x50x8 cm) and 1 AccuGait® (1000 fps) force plate recordings. Subsequently, the movement analysis lab is equipped with a 16 channel telemetric wireless electromyographic (EMG) system (Arion Zerowire) which measures muscle activity. Recordings where analysed using the Vicon Nexus 1.8.5. software. Step time parameters and gait kinematics were filtered (Butterworth filter) and further processed in Matlab® (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, U.S.A.).
3. Trunk Impairment Scale, Barthel Index

Follow-up. One month post intervention patients will be again subjected to clinical and biomechanical assessment to measure the sustainability of trunk exercises over time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trunk training

Exercises: Core stability training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trunk training

Intervention Type OTHER

The experimental group receives 16 hours of additional trunk training (4 days/week, 4 weeks) focusing on trunk muscle strength, coordination and selective movements executed on stable and unstable surfaces.

Cognitive exercises

Exercises: The RevArte Visual Search Test (RVST) of Lafosse et al (2013) and the Visuospatial Neglect Test Battery (VNTB) of Vaes et al. (2015)

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Cognitive exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

The control group will be receiving the same amount of repetitive cognitive exercises within arm's range to ensure no anticipatory postural adjustments of the trunk.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trunk training

The experimental group receives 16 hours of additional trunk training (4 days/week, 4 weeks) focusing on trunk muscle strength, coordination and selective movements executed on stable and unstable surfaces.

Intervention Type OTHER

Cognitive exercises

The control group will be receiving the same amount of repetitive cognitive exercises within arm's range to ensure no anticipatory postural adjustments of the trunk.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke diagnosis has to be confirmed by the consultant appointed at the rehabilitation centre on the basis of CT or MRI imaging
* Patients with a history of first stroke
* Stroke onset within five months
* Patients who are able to sit independently for 30 seconds on a stable surface
* Hospitalized in the rehabilitation hospital RevArte
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* A score of 20 or higher on the Trunk Impairment Scale
* A score of 2 or lower on the Functional Ambulation Categories
* Patients suffering from other neurological and orthopaedic disorders that could influence motor performance and balance
* Patients not able to understand instructions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universiteit Antwerpen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tamaya Van Criekinge

Academic assistent

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tamaya Van Criekinge, Msc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universiteit Antwerpen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Van Criekinge T, Hallemans A, Herssens N, Lafosse C, Claes D, De Hertogh W, Truijen S, Saeys W. SWEAT2 Study: Effectiveness of Trunk Training on Gait and Trunk Kinematics After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 31;100(9):1568-1581. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa110.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32542356 (View on PubMed)

Van Criekinge T, Saeys W, Hallemans A, Vereeck L, De Hertogh W, Van de Walle P, Vaes N, Lafosse C, Truijen S. Effectiveness of additional trunk exercises on gait performance: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1989-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28578679 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TVC-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reactive Balance Training and Fitness
NCT04042961 TERMINATED NA
Gait Recovery After Stroke
NCT06806748 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
HIT-Stroke Trial 2
NCT06268041 RECRUITING NA