Trial Outcomes & Findings for Management of Coccydynia: A Prospective, Observational Study of Coccygectomy (NCT NCT02701192)

NCT ID: NCT02701192

Last Updated: 2022-04-22

Results Overview

Patients will complete the100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline and 2 years after procedure. Patient will be instructed to indicate pain intensity by marking a 100mm line where one end, 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates extreme pain on the other end.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

100 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline,1 year and 2 years

Results posted on

2022-04-22

Participant Flow

From 2007-2011, 98 patients underwent coccygectomy for chronic coccydynia. Included patients were over 18 years, had coccygeal pain and abnormality on physical and radiographic evaluation and had failed conservative management. Outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Overall Study
STARTED
100
Overall Study
COMPLETED
94
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4

Baseline Characteristics

Management of Coccydynia: A Prospective, Observational Study of Coccygectomy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=98 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Age, Continuous
47.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Etiology for Symptoms
Idiopathic
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
Etiology for Symptoms
Trauma
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Etiology for Symptoms
Significant weight loss
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Etiology for Symptoms
Post-partum
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Etiology for Symptoms
Post floor surgery
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Pre-existing Spinal disorder
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Non-spine related musculoskletal pathology
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Psychiatric illness
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Chronic pain
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Genitourinary pain disorder
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Co-morbidities
Other pain syndrome
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Coccydynia Pain Management
Prior Steroid Injection Therapy
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Coccydynia Pain Management
Prior Opioid Use
45 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

Patients will complete the100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline and 2 years after procedure. Patient will be instructed to indicate pain intensity by marking a 100mm line where one end, 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates extreme pain on the other end.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Pain Change From Baseline at 2 Years
Pre-operative Baseline
59.08 units on a scale
Interval 54.06 to 64.1
Pain Change From Baseline at 2 Years
One year
19.35 units on a scale
Interval 13.97 to 24.73
Pain Change From Baseline at 2 Years
Two Years
20.28 units on a scale
Interval 14.64 to 25.92

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2:Physical Functioning
Baseline
55.23 units on a scale
Interval 48.65 to 61.81
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2:Physical Functioning
One Year
80.68 units on a scale
Interval 74.67 to 86.99
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2:Physical Functioning
Two Years
79.24 units on a scale
Interval 73.82 to 84.66

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2: Role Functioning-Physical
Baseline
30.21 units on a scale
Interval 22.07 to 38.35
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2: Role Functioning-Physical
Two Years
70.12 units on a scale
Interval 61.13 to 79.11
Patient Health Status- SF-36v2: Role Functioning-Physical
One Year
69.41 units on a scale
Interval 59.98 to 78.84

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Role Functioning- Emotional
Baseline
54.17 units on a scale
Interval 45.08 to 63.26
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Role Functioning- Emotional
One Year
86.99 units on a scale
Interval 80.02 to 93.96
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Role Functioning- Emotional
Two Years
73.4 units on a scale
Interval 64.67 to 82.13

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Energy/Fatigue
Baseline
43.07 units on a scale
Interval 38.21 to 47.93
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Energy/Fatigue
One Year
62.05 units on a scale
Interval 56.86 to 67.24
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Energy/Fatigue
Two Years
60.78 units on a scale
Interval 56.0 to 65.56

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Emotional Well-being
Baseline
66.28 units on a scale
Interval 62.02 to 70.54
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Emotional Well-being
One Year
79.73 units on a scale
Interval 75.81 to 83.65
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Emotional Well-being
Two Years
77.44 units on a scale
Interval 73.36 to 81.52

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Social Functioning
Baseline
47.18 units on a scale
Interval 42.11 to 52.25
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Social Functioning
One Year
55.45 units on a scale
Interval 51.26 to 59.64
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Social Functioning
Two Years
55.81 units on a scale
Interval 51.89 to 59.73

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Pain
Baseline
39.95 units on a scale
Interval 35.4 to 44.5
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Pain
One Year
70.34 units on a scale
Interval 63.96 to 76.72
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Pain
Two Years
71.75 units on a scale
Interval 66.06 to 77.44

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: General Health
Baseline
68.39 units on a scale
Interval 64.4 to 72.38
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: General Health
One Year
73.41 units on a scale
Interval 68.61 to 78.21
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: General Health
Two Years
69.31 units on a scale
Interval 64.46 to 74.16

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

The SF-36 is on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable/better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Health Change
Baseline
45.31 units on a scale
Interval 39.82 to 50.8
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Health Change
One Year
81.4 units on a scale
Interval 76.03 to 86.77
Patient Health Status-SF-36v2: Health Change
Two Years
74.47 units on a scale
Interval 68.98 to 79.96

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

Oswestry Disability Index used to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. Scores range from 0 to 100. scores between 0 and 20 described as "minimal disability", scores between 21and 40 described as "moderate disability",scores between 41and 60 described as "severe disability",scores between 61 and 80 described as "crippled" and scores between 81 and 100 described as " bed bounded"

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Lower Back Disability
Pre-operative Baseline
39.07 units on a scale
Interval 35.22 to 49.92
Lower Back Disability
One Year
15.39 units on a scale
Interval 11.26 to 42.92
Lower Back Disability
Two Years
16.26 units on a scale
Interval 12.59 to 19.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

Complication rates after coccygectomy surgery

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=94 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Complication Rates
20 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,1 year and 2 years

Threshold for treatment success was based on a minimum clinically importance difference (MCID) of 20 points on the oswestry disability index at 2 year follow-up and an overall oswestry disability index score of \<22 points.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Coccygectomy Treatment
n=98 Participants
Patients undergoing coccygectomy surgical procedure. Coccygectomy: Patient receiving coccygectomy surgery.
Treatment Success
Treatment Success
69 Participants
Treatment Success
Treatment Failure
29 Participants

Adverse Events

Coccygectomy Treatment

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Rachel Seymour, PhD

Carolinas Healthcare System

Phone: 704-355-2000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place