Fast-track Surgery After Gynecological Oncology Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02687412

Last Updated: 2019-09-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-21

Study Completion Date

2018-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fast-track surgery (FTS) pathway, also known as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), FTS is a multidisciplinary approach aiming to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimize hospital stay without an increased readmission rate and reduce healthcare costs, all without compromising patient safety. It has been used successfully in non-malignant gynecological surgery, but it has been proven to be especially effective in elective colorectal surgery. However, no consensus guideline has been developed for gynecological oncology surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. NO randomised controlled trials for now.

The advantages of fast-track most likely extend to gynecology, although so far have scarcely been reported. There is a existing research showed FTS in gynecological oncology provide early hospital discharge after gynaecological surgery meanwhile with high levels of patient satisfaction.

The aim of this study is to identify patients following a FTS program who have been discharged earlier than anticipated after major gynaecological/gynaecological oncologic surgery and analyze the complication after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods/Design

Comparison of Fast-Track (FT) and traditional management protocols. the primary endpoints is length of hospitalization post-operation (d, mean±SD). It was calculated by the difference between date of discharge and date of surgery. The secondary endpoints are complications in both groups are assessed during the first 21 days postoperatively. Including infection(wound infection, lung infection, intraperitoneal infection, operation space infection), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) , ileus, postoperative hemorrhage, postoperative thrombosis and APACHE II score.

The advantages of fast-track most likely extend to gynecology, although so far have scarcely been reported. NO randomised controlled trials for now. The aim of this study is to compare the LOS (Length of hospitalization post-operation) after the major gynaecological/gynaecological oncologic surgery and analyze the complication after surgery. This trial can show whether the FTS program can achieve early hospital discharge after gynaecological surgery meanwhile with low levels of complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Length of Stay Postoperative Complications CRP

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective randomised controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Patients were randomly divided into two groups( FTS group/traditional group), after that doctors and patients were aware of the grouping situation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fast-track Surgery

Pre-operative: Assessment, counseling and education; preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery, bowel preparation, only oral intestinal cleaner,antimicrobial prophylaxis and skin preparation; preoperative treatment with carbohydrates (patients without diabetes). Intraoperative : fast solid food before 6 h and liquid food Intake of clear fluids 2 h before anaesthesia; avoiding hypothermia keeping temperature at 36 ±0.5℃, antiemetics at end of anaesthesia. Post-operative : Postoperative glycaemic control; postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) control; early postoperative diet(3-6 h after surgery).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

pre-operative assessment, counseling and education

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-operative assessment, counseling and FT management education

Preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery mechanical bowl preparation should not be used

bowel preparation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients are not received mechanical bowel preparation, only oral intestinal cleaner 12 h pre-operation can be accepted, but no need of liquid stool

preoperative treatment with carbohydrates

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

preoperative treatment with carbohydrates (patients without diabetes).

fast solid

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fast solid food before 6 h and liquid food Intake of clear fluids 2 h before anaesthesia;

avoiding hypothermia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

avoiding hypothermia, keeping the intra-operative lowtemperature at 36 ±0.5 degree centigrade; antiemetics at end of anaesthesia.

Postoperative glycaemic control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Postoperative glycaemic control;

postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) control;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

early postoperative diet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

early postoperative diet(3-6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, 12 h after surgery patients began to take solid diet).

Traditional surgery

pre-operative assessment:pre-operative fasting at least 8h, bowel preparation for traditional surgery, Antimicrobial prophylaxis and skin preparation or mechanical bowl until liquid stool Intraoperative: keeping the intra-operative lowtemperature at 34.7±0.6 degree centigrade.

Post-operative: 6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, patients began to take solid diet after anal exhaust

Group Type OTHER

pre-operative fasting at least 8h

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bowel preparation for traditional surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Oral bowel preparations or mechanical bowl until liquid stool

began to take solid diet after anal exhaust

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, patients began to take solid diet after anal exhaust

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pre-operative assessment, counseling and education

pre-operative assessment, counseling and FT management education

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery

Preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery mechanical bowl preparation should not be used

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bowel preparation

patients are not received mechanical bowel preparation, only oral intestinal cleaner 12 h pre-operation can be accepted, but no need of liquid stool

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

preoperative treatment with carbohydrates

preoperative treatment with carbohydrates (patients without diabetes).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fast solid

fast solid food before 6 h and liquid food Intake of clear fluids 2 h before anaesthesia;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

avoiding hypothermia

avoiding hypothermia, keeping the intra-operative lowtemperature at 36 ±0.5 degree centigrade; antiemetics at end of anaesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Postoperative glycaemic control

Postoperative glycaemic control;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) control;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

early postoperative diet

early postoperative diet(3-6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, 12 h after surgery patients began to take solid diet).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-operative fasting at least 8h

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bowel preparation for traditional surgery

Oral bowel preparations or mechanical bowl until liquid stool

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

began to take solid diet after anal exhaust

6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, patients began to take solid diet after anal exhaust

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients scheduled for gynecological oncology surgery(including radical hysterectomy add lymphadenectomy, hysterectomy add lymphadenectomy and cytoreductive)
2. Aged 18 years or older
3. Signed informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a documented infection at the time of operation
2. Aged 71 years or older
3. Patients with ileus at the time of operation
4. Patients with hypocoagulability
5. Patients with psychosis, Alcohol dependence or drug abuse history
6. Patients with primary nephrotic or hepatic disease
7. Patients with severe hypertension systolic pressure≥160mmHg, diastolic pressure\>90mmHg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ling Cui

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ling Cui

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ling Cui, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Yu Shi

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Hong Liu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Dengfeng Wang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LinShuangfeng

Leshan, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):791-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60357-8. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18328911 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12095591 (View on PubMed)

Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA. Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg. 2007;24(6):441-9. doi: 10.1159/000108327. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17851238 (View on PubMed)

Acheson N, Crawford R. The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2011 Feb;118(3):271-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02811.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21226823 (View on PubMed)

Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7891489 (View on PubMed)

Carter J, Szabo R, Sim WW, Pather S, Philp S, Nattress K, Cotterell S, Patel P, Dalrymple C. Fast track surgery: a clinical audit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;50(2):159-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01134.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20522073 (View on PubMed)

Bona S, Molteni M, Rosati R, Elmore U, Bagnoli P, Monzani R, Caravaca M, Montorsi M. Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17578-87. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17578.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25516673 (View on PubMed)

Carter J. Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:368014. doi: 10.5402/2012/368014. Epub 2012 Dec 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23320193 (View on PubMed)

Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 Apr 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15896435 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):355-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19617822 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21468643 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):189-98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18650627 (View on PubMed)

Kranke P, Redel A, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Eberhart LH. Pharmacological interventions and concepts of fast-track perioperative medical care for enhanced recovery programs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;9(9):1541-64. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.9.1541.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18518784 (View on PubMed)

Lin YS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Feb;10(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60239-3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12554999 (View on PubMed)

Lu D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25789452 (View on PubMed)

Lv D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20556792 (View on PubMed)

Marx C, Rasmussen T, Jakobsen DH, Ottosen C, Lundvall L, Ottesen B, Callesen T, Kehlet H. The effect of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for ovarian malignancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):488-92. doi: 10.1080/00016340500408325.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16612713 (View on PubMed)

Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):657-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11304106 (View on PubMed)

Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schafer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Group. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1209-29. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9582. Epub 2014 Jul 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25047143 (View on PubMed)

Philp S, Carter J, Pather S, Barnett C, D'Abrew N, White K. Patients' satisfaction with fast-track surgery in gynaecological oncology. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Jul;24(4):567-73. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12254. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25335828 (View on PubMed)

Pruthi RS, Nielsen M, Smith A, Nix J, Schultz H, Wallen EM. Fast track program in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results in 362 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jan;210(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.026. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20123338 (View on PubMed)

Sjetne IS, Krogstad U, Odegard S, Engh ME. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Jun;18(3):236-40. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023382.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19468009 (View on PubMed)

Chau JPC, Liu X, Lo SHS, Chien WT, Hui SK, Choi KC, Zhao J. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 15;3(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35289396 (View on PubMed)

Cui L, Shi Y, Zhang GN. Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Dec 15;17(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27978842 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SichuanCHRI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perioperative Risk Study
NCT02456389 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA