Perioperative Risk Study

NCT ID: NCT02456389

Last Updated: 2025-04-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1456 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this trial is to determine if perioperative risk stratification and risk-based, protocol-driven management leads to a reduction in the rate of death or serious complications compared to standard perioperative management in patients undergoing elective major cancer surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Major cancer surgery is associated with significant rates of postoperative mortality and major morbidity. Postoperative morbidity adversely impacts healthcare utilization, healthcare costs, rates of discharge to home, quality of life, rates of receipt of postoperative anti-neoplastic therapy, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The investigators hypothesize that perioperative risk stratification and risk-based, protocol-driven management (compared to standard perioperative management) will lead to a reduction in 30-day post-operative mortality or major morbidity in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. This is based on our theory that preoperative/postoperative use of newly developed, perioperative risk-prediction tools will help identify patients at increased risk of postoperative death or serious complications that might benefit from risk-based, protocol-driven perioperative management, including escalating levels of care, escalating levels of monitoring, and escalating levels of hospitalist co-management. The set of assessments and interventions in the proposed study are conceptually similar to other "bundled" interventions which have recently been recently tested and demonstrated to reduce perioperative mortality and morbidity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tumors Primary Neoplasm Secondary Neoplasm Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard perioperative management

Standard postoperative care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard postoperative care

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine postoperative care, as medically indicated

Risk-based, perioperative management

Preoperative risk stratification Postoperative risk stratification Risk-based, escalating levels of care Risk-based, escalating levels of monitoring Risk-based, escalating levels of co-management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preoperative risk stratification

Intervention Type OTHER

Preoperative risk-prediction tool based on patient demographics/co-morbidity and planned procedure

Postoperative risk stratification

Intervention Type OTHER

Postoperative risk-prediction tool based on intraoperative variables

Risk-based, escalating levels of care

Intervention Type OTHER

Postoperative observation in regular unit vs. telemetry unit vs. stepdown unit vs. ICU

Risk-based, escalating levels of monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Varying frequencies of vital signs monitoring Varying use of telemetry, pulse oximetry, and early warning system

Risk-based, escalating levels of co-management

Intervention Type OTHER

Varying use of Hospitalist co-management

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preoperative risk stratification

Preoperative risk-prediction tool based on patient demographics/co-morbidity and planned procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

Postoperative risk stratification

Postoperative risk-prediction tool based on intraoperative variables

Intervention Type OTHER

Risk-based, escalating levels of care

Postoperative observation in regular unit vs. telemetry unit vs. stepdown unit vs. ICU

Intervention Type OTHER

Risk-based, escalating levels of monitoring

Varying frequencies of vital signs monitoring Varying use of telemetry, pulse oximetry, and early warning system

Intervention Type OTHER

Risk-based, escalating levels of co-management

Varying use of Hospitalist co-management

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard postoperative care

Routine postoperative care, as medically indicated

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> or = 18 years at diagnosis.
2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, 2, or 3.
3. Probable (i.e., clinically suspicious) or histologically/cytologically confirmed, primary or recurrent, malignant neoplasm, malignant neuroendocrine tumor, or carcinoma in situ (any stage).
4. Scheduled for curative or palliative major cancer surgery, including:

* Glossectomy
* Pharyngectomy
* Laryngectomy
* Neck dissection
* Esophagectomy
* Lung resection
* Gastrectomy
* Pancreatectomy
* Hepatectomy
* Colectomy
* Proctectomy
* Hysterectomy/Myomectomy
* Gynecologic reconstruction
* Prostatectomy
* Nephrectomy
* Cystectomy
* Breast reconstruction
* Flap reconstruction
5. Scheduled for elective major cancer surgery at Fox Chase Cancer Center within 30 days after First Registration.
6. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) consent document
7. Geographical accessibility and willingness to return to Fox Chase Cancer Center for all preoperative and postoperative study assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Clinical or tissue diagnosis of benign neuroendocrine tumor, benign neoplasm, neoplasm of uncertain behavior, or neoplasm of unspecified nature.
2. Use of systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy \< 14 days prior to First Registration. Palliative radiation therapy is permitted for irradiating small areas of painful bony metastases that cannot be managed adequately using systemic or local analgesics
3. Any condition that might interfere with the subject's participation in the study, compliance with study requirements, or in the evaluation of the study results.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fox Chase Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nestor F Esnaola, MD, MPH, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SURG-073

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.