Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1822 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves II - S3 Intermediate
NCT03222128
PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves II - High Risk and Nested Registry 7
NCT03222141
PARTNER 3 Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
NCT02675114
THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial
NCT00530894
The PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves - PII B
NCT02184442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAVR
Intermediate risk patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
SAPIEN S3 valve
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SAPIEN S3 valve
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Assessment of intermediate surgical risk defined as STS 4-8% or heart team assessment of intermediate risk factors.
3. Patient has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiographically derived criteria: mean gradient \> 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s and an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of \< 0.8 cm2 or indexed EOA \< 0.5 cm2/m2. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
4. Aortic valve annulus area range (273mm2-680 mm2) per 3D imaging (echo, CT, or MRI).
5. Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class II or greater.
6. The heart team agrees (and verified in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
7. Heart team agrees (a priori) on treatment strategy for concomitant coronary disease (if present).
8. The study patient or the study patient's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
9. The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years and analysis close date visits, which will be conducted as a phone follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment \[(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)\].
3. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve, or is non-calcified.
4. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic re-regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation \>3+).
5. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position.
6. Complex coronary artery disease:
1. Unprotected left main coronary artery
2. Syntax score \> 32 (in the absence of prior revascularization)
8. Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) \< 30 days of the procedure (unless BAV is a bridge to procedure after a qualifying ECHO).
9. Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
10. Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb \< 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (Plt \< 50,000 cell/mL).
11. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM).
12. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
13. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
14. Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF \< 20%.
15. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
16. Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure.
17. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
18. Native aortic annulus size \< 16 mm or \> 28mm as measured by echocardiogram.
19. Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure.
20. Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL) and/or renal replacement therapy at the time of screening.
21. Estimated life expectancy \< 24 months (730 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal dis-ease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease.
22. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of aortic stenosis.
23. Significant aortic disease, including marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma \[especially if thick (\> 5 mm), protruding or ulcerated\] or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta. (Transfemoral)
24. Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 14F or 16F introducer sheath such as severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or min-imum average vessel size less than 5.5 mm. (Transfem-oral).
25. Currently participating in an investigational drug or an-other device study. Note: Trials requiring extended fol-low-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
26. Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.
27. Evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation, active infection or endocarditis.
28. Inability to tolerate anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy.
29. For transfemoral approach only: Femoro-iliac vessels \< 5.5 mm for the 23 mm and the 26 mm system and \< 6.0 mm for the 29 mm system.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edwards Lifesciences
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susheel Kodali, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Columbia
Vinod Thourani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scripps Green Hospital
La Jolla, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Palo Alto, California, United States
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington Hospital Center DC
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Prairie Education and Research Cooperative
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Indiana University Health-Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
St. Vincent Medical Group, Inc./ St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Louisville Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Hospital and Health Systems
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic-Saint Marys Hospital
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City Mid America
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Washington University/ Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Nebraska Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Winthrop-University Hospital
Mineola, New York, United States
Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Northshore Long Island Jewish Health System
New York, New York, United States
Medical University of South Carolina Charleston
Charleston, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma Cardiovascular Research Group
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Providence Heart & Vascular Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
York Hospital
York, Pennsylvania, United States
Baptist Memorial Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Austin Heart, PLLC
Austin, Texas, United States
Medical City Dallas Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Intermountain Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abbas AE, Ternacle J, Pibarot P, Xu K, Alu M, Rogers E, Hahn RT, Leon M, Thourani VH. Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-12 S3iCAP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.