Radiofrequency Ablation Using Cooled-Wet Electrode

NCT ID: NCT02675894

Last Updated: 2021-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-14

Study Completion Date

2018-04-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data of recently introduced cool-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data (12 months local tumor progression rate) of recently introduced cooled-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors in comparison with currently used separable clustered electrode in our institution. Owing to tissue cooling effect of internally cooled-wet electrode can be used in switching bipolar mode. Patients would be randomized into two groups (cool-wet electrode group and separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode). The results from this preliminary study would be used for main study to compare the efficacy and safety data between two electrodes in the future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HCC Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RFA with cooled-wet electrode

RFA is performed using three cool-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode under the fused US guidance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cooled-wet electrode

Intervention Type DEVICE

RFA is performed using three cooled-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode. The electrode is anticipated to reduce tissue resistance by releasing small amount of saline during the procedure, which may lead larger ablative volume by delivering more RF energy.

RFA with separable clustered electrode

RFA using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode under the fused US guidance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

separable clustered electrode

Intervention Type DEVICE

RFA is performed using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cooled-wet electrode

RFA is performed using three cooled-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode. The electrode is anticipated to reduce tissue resistance by releasing small amount of saline during the procedure, which may lead larger ablative volume by delivering more RF energy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

separable clustered electrode

RFA is performed using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Octopus(R)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with HCC (1\~5cm) according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS on MDCT or liver MRI within 60 days before RFA
* liver metastasis histologically confirmed or characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging
* signed informed consent
* treatment naive index tumor (no history of local treatment for an index tumor)

Exclusion Criteria

* more than three tumors in a patients
* tumor size larger than 5cm
* tumor attaches to central portal vein or hepatic vein
* Child-Pugh classification C
* uncorrected coagulopathy
* presence of extrahepatic metastases
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RF medical

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical Research Collaborating Center

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeong Min Lee

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeong Min Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNUH-2013-2283

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Plan for Microwave Thermal Field
NCT05270642 UNKNOWN NA