IMPI 2 - A Trial of Intrapericardial Alteplase in Large Pericardial Effusion

NCT ID: NCT02673879

Last Updated: 2018-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Second Investigation of the Management of Pericarditis (IMPI-2) Trial will compare the effectiveness and safety of complete percutaneous pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial alteplase (recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator) to conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated in 2176 patients with large pericardial effusion due to tuberculous and non-tuberculous pericarditis. An internal pilot study of 218 patients will initially confirm the feasibility of conducting a large-scale multi-centre clinical trial of intrapericardial fibrinolysis in patients with large pericardial effusion, and also provide preliminary safety data, following a dose finding study of intrapericardial alteplase.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intrapericardial fibrinolytic agents are used in the drainage of tuberculous, purulent, neoplastic and other inflammatory pericardial effusions to prevent recurrent effusions and constrictive pericarditis. This use is based on evidence from case reports and a small trial that did not have the statistical power to reliably evaluate the effect of pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial fibrinolysis on safety and important clinical outcomes.

The Second Investigation of the Management of Pericarditis (IMPI-2) Trial will compare the effectiveness and safety of complete percutaneous pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial alteplase (recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator) to conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated in 2176 patients with large pericardial effusion due to tuberculous and non-tuberculous pericarditis. An internal pilot study of 218 patients will initially confirm the feasibility of conducting a large-scale multi-centre clinical trial of intrapericardial fibrinolysis in patients with large pericardial effusion, and also provide preliminary safety data, following a dose finding study of intrapericardial alteplase.

Hypothesis: We hypothesise that patients with large pericardial effusion randomized to intrapericardial alteplase to ensure complete pericardial drainage will have at least a 35% reduction in cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or constrictive pericarditis compared to conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated.

Objectives: The primary objectives of the IMPI-2 Trial are:

1. To demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a multicentre clinical trial of intrapericardial fibrinolysis in patients with large pericardial effusion, and to assess the safety of intrapericardial alteplase in an internal pilot study, and
2. To determine the effectiveness of intrapericardial alteplase in reducing the composite outcome of cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or constrictive pericarditis in patients with large pericardial effusion in the full trial.

Should the internal pilot study demonstrate feasibility and safety; all 218 patients will be rolled-over into the full scale IMPI-2 trial of 2176 participants. The primary outcome is the first occurrence of cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or constrictive pericarditis. The secondary safety endpoint is safety of intrapericardial fibrinolysis measured by effect on major bleeding, and serious and non-serious adverse events. The secondary efficacy outcomes are constrictive pericarditis, and cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis, analysed separately, and persistent or recurrent pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade, hospitalisation, and death. The secondary diagnostic outcomes are proportion with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis from any organ or tissue; time to diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis in days; accuracy of novel tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis; proportion with specific diagnosis of any pericardial disease; time to diagnosis of a specific pericardial disease in days.

Study Design: IMPI-2 is a prospective randomized open blinded end-point trial that will enroll 2176 patients with large pericardial effusion over 36 months from up to 30 centres in South Africa and Africa. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive complete pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial fibrinolysis or conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated on enrollment to the study. Patients will be followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and in months 6, and 12 after enrollment. The IMPI Project Office, University of Cape Town, South Africa will manage and coordinate the study in association with the Pericarditis Research Unit, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa and the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Canada.

Importance: IMPI-2 addresses very serious complications of large pericardial effusion (i.e., cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis), which are associated with high mortality despite pericardiocentesis or pericardiectomy. This study will utilise the research network that was established by the IMPI trial which was completed in 2014.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pericardial Effusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pericardiocentesis with Alteplase

Complete percutaneous pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial alteplase.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pericardiocentesis with Alteplase

Intervention Type OTHER

Complete percutaneous pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial alteplase

Conventional Pericardiocentesis

Conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated.

Group Type OTHER

Conventional Pericardiocentesis

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pericardiocentesis with Alteplase

Complete percutaneous pericardial drainage facilitated by intrapericardial alteplase

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Pericardiocentesis

Conventional pericardiocentesis when indicated

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years of age;
2. Confirmed large pericardial effusion on echocardiography (i.e., echo free space ≥1 cm anterior to the right ventricle of the heart in diastole);
3. Willingness to participate for the full duration of the trial (i.e., 12 months); and
4. Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years;
2. Uraemic pericarditis (i.e., urea \> 21.4 mmol/l);
3. Thrombocytopenia (i.e., \< 100,000 platelets per µl);
4. Presence of a contra-indication to the administration of a fibrinolytic agent (i.e., major haemorrhage or major trauma; coincidental stroke; major surgery in the previous 5 days; blood pressure \>200/100 mmHg).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Walter Sisulu University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Population Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Cape Town

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bongani M Mayosi

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bongani M Mayosi, DPhil

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Cape Town

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groote Schuur Hospital

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Veronica Francis

Role: CONTACT

+27832449895

Abolade A Awotedu, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+27822007694

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shaheen Pandie, MMed (Med)

Role: primary

+27823199030

Veronica Francis

Role: backup

+27832449895

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HREC REF No. 370/2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The PEERLESS Study
NCT05111613 COMPLETED NA