The Reduced Insulinotropic Effect of a Continuous Infusion Relative to a Bolus Injection of GIP

NCT ID: NCT02673554

Last Updated: 2016-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has lost its insulinotropic activity, but more so after continuous versus bolus administration. The design was a two-way crossover design comparing repeated bolus injection and continuous infusion of GIP under hyperglycaemic clamp conditions. Patients were age- gender- and weight-matched with type 2 diabetes, first degree relatives of such patients, and healthy subjects. Investigators performed a:

1. Oral glucose challenge;
2. hyperglycemic clamp (8.5 mmol/l) with two repeated GIP bolus administrations (50 pmol/kg body weight at 30 and 120 min); and
3. hyperglycemic clamp with continuous administration of GIP (2 pmol.kg-1.min-1 from 30-180 min).

To answer the question, whether rapid tachyphylaxis occurs with regard to the insulinotropic action of GIP, investigators studied type 2-diabetic patients, their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls under hyperglycaemic clamp conditions with two GIP bolus injections 90 min apart, and compared this to a continued intravenous infusion of GIP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral glucose tolerance test

An oral glucose challenge (75 g)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

an oral glucose challenge (75 g)

GIP Bolus

Hyperglycemic clamp (capillary venous glucose concentration \~ 8.5 mmol/l) with two repeated intravenous bolus injections of synthetic human GIP (50 pmol/kg body weight) administered 30 and 120 min after commencing the hyperglycemic clamp

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GIP Bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

bolus injections of synthetic human GIP (50 pmol/kg body weight) administered 30 and 120 min after commencing the hyperglycemic clamp

hyperglycemic clamp

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a hyperglycemic clamp (capillary venous glucose concentration \~ 8.5 mmol/l)

GIP Infusion

Hyperglycemic clamp with the continuous intravenous infusion of 2 pmol.kg-1.min-1 synthetic human GIP between 30 and 180 min

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GIP Clamp

Intervention Type DRUG

hyperglycemic clamp with the continuous intravenous infusion of 2 pmol.kg-1.min-1 synthetic human GIP between 30 and 180 min

hyperglycemic clamp

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a hyperglycemic clamp (capillary venous glucose concentration \~ 8.5 mmol/l)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GIP Bolus

bolus injections of synthetic human GIP (50 pmol/kg body weight) administered 30 and 120 min after commencing the hyperglycemic clamp

Intervention Type DRUG

GIP Clamp

hyperglycemic clamp with the continuous intravenous infusion of 2 pmol.kg-1.min-1 synthetic human GIP between 30 and 180 min

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

an oral glucose challenge (75 g)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hyperglycemic clamp

a hyperglycemic clamp (capillary venous glucose concentration \~ 8.5 mmol/l)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Exclusion of pregnancy
* Exclusion of impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes in metabolical healthy subjects
* current diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to the guidelines of the German Diabetes Association (DDG) ( Kerner et al . 2001) in subjects of diabetes group
* fasting glucose ≤ 150 mg/dl
* Body-mass-index ≥ 20 kg/m²
* Written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes
* Impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes in metabolical healthy subjects
* Ketone bodies urine diagnostics at least ++
* Acidosis
* Fasting blood glucose \> 150 mg/dl
* Body-mass-index \< 20 kg/m²
* No written consent
* Pregnancy or unsafe contraception in women before menopause
* Active malignancy
* Angina as current, unsolved clinical problem
* Inadequately treated or untreated arterial hypertension ( \> 160 mmHg systolic and / or \> 95 mmHg diastolic )
* Infection / fever \> 37.5 ° C
* Treatment with glucocorticoids
* Insulin therapy within the last three months
* Anemia with a hemoglobin level \< 12 g/dl
* Liver function limitations
* Renal impairment ( serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl )
* Alcohol or drug abuse
* Participation in clinical trials in the last 3 months
* Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the Protocol
* Known hypersensitivity to GIP
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg im Harz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael A. Nauck

Prof. Dr. med. Michael A. Nauck

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael A. Nauck, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIP and Tachyphylaxis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GIP and GLP-1 in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT01739283 COMPLETED NA