A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial of Surinam Cherry Dentifrice With Anti-gingivitis Properties

NCT ID: NCT02648139

Last Updated: 2016-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-12-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the present randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial, we investigated the short term clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing Eugenia uniflora L. ripe fruit extract in preventing gingivitis in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating the short term clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing Eugenia uniflora L. ripe fruit extract in preventing gingivitis in children. The study consisted of a sample of 50 male and female subjects between the ages of 10 and 12 years old, who had clinical signs of gingivitis. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group comprised 25 subjects who used the dentifrice with E. uniflora L. ripe fruit hydroalcoholic extract, three times per day, for seven consecutive days. The control group comprised 25 subjects who used the control dentifrice (fluoride, 1500 ppm and triclosan, 0.3%) for seven consecutive days.

The sample size was estimated using Fleming's single-stage procedure for phase II trials. With regard to the primary outcome, a response proportion of at least 50% was defined as being clinically significant. The type I error was set as 0.05, and the type II error was set at 0.1. Based on these values, a sample size of 20 individuals per trial arm would provide 90% power (1-β) to detect any clinically relevant treatment difference of 50% or greater compared to baseline. Taking into consideration an attrition rate of approximately 20%, the final sample size per trial arm comprised 25 individuals.

Clinical examinations were performed at baseline and after seven days of dentifrice use. The examination was performed by a single examiner who was adequately calibrated with a Kappa statistic of 0.8, which is considered to be satisfactory agreement according to Landis \& Koch. The examination data were recorded in a specific clinical chart. The diagnosis of gingivitis (primary outcome) was assessed using the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) proposed by Ainamo and Bay. The accumulation of biofilm (secondary outcome) was assessed with the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) described by Greene and Vermilion. Prior to the study, all of the subjects were instructed on correct tooth brushing techniques and received a kit that contained a toothbrush and one of the dentifrices (without the identification of its contents). The dentifrices were also masked with regard to flavor and color so that they could not be identified. In addition, the examiner had no knowledge of the subject allocation. Thus, the study was double-blind.

The sample included only subjects who had not used an antimicrobial in the last two months, including topical fluoride.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingivitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental dentifrice

Dentifrice containing the extract of Eugenia uniflora rip fruit. Each 10 ml of E. uniflora L. dentifrice comprises the following components: Hydroalcoholic extract of the ripe fruit of E. uniflora L. (3.0%), preservatives (parabens; 0.02 g), and dentifrice base (silicon dioxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, white dye, aromatic compounds, sodium saccharin, and Gangrez sodium salt; q.s.p.). Intervention protocol: three times per day (pea-like amount), for seven consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dentifrice

Intervention Type DRUG

3x/day for 7 days.

Control Dentifrice

Control dentifrice - Colgate total 12 (fluoride, 1500 ppm and triclosan, 0.3%)

Intervention protocol: three times per day (pea-like amount), for seven consecutive days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dentifrice

Intervention Type DRUG

3x/day for 7 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dentifrice

3x/day for 7 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Surrinam cherry dentifrice, Colgate total 12

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 10 to 12 years old with clinical signs of gingivitis (bleeding on probing);
* Presence of at least 20 dental elements
* Not using orthodontic fixed appliances
* Susceptibility to form biofilm and gingival inflammation
* Absence of systemic disease

Exclusion Criteria

\- Subjects who had used an antimicrobial in the last two months, including topical fluoride.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Paraíba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Irlan de Almeida Freires

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ricardo D Castro, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Paraíba

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Eugenia Dentifrice

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dentinal Hypersensitivity Reduction
NCT06244290 COMPLETED PHASE3