Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Responses in Thoracic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02647775
Last Updated: 2020-01-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nonintubated Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Versus Double-lumen Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT01677442
The Impact of Different Anticoagulant Therapy on Hemorrhage and Coagulation After Thoracic Surgery
NCT01267305
The Safety and Efficacy of "3-Hole" Subxiphorid Approach in the Treatment of Anterior Mediastinal Tumor
NCT02317224
Non-Invasive Techniques to Maintain Neck Flexion and Reduce Anastomotic Tension After Tracheal Resection
NCT07059195
Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Change on Pulmonary Blood Flow and Cardiac Function Induced by Capnothorax During One Lung Ventilation
NCT02220231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, a minimally invasive approach that is different from the conventional multiport thoracoscopic technique is gradually becoming of great interest in the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic surgical disease. Single-port VATS is one of the most promising emerging surgical techniques which allows the surgeon to perform a majority of thoracic surgeries and with similar perioperative outcomes that are comparable with the conventional multiport technique. However, a very limited number of clinical studies have demonstrated the advantages of single port VATS in postoperative pain reduction, when comparing to the traditional multiport thoracoscopic approach.
To clarify the physiologic and immunologic effects of different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery, investigators aim to compare the perioperative physiological changes, immunological responses, and postoperative pain between standard (multi-port) transthoracic thoracoscopic and single-port transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
multi-port VATS
Multi-port VATS is an operative method
multi-port VATS
Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
single-port VATS
Single-port VATS is an operative method
single-port VATS
Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
multi-port VATS
Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
single-port VATS
Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous history of ipsilateral pulmonary resection
* Patients with complex cardiopulmonary dysfunction
* Unresectable pulmonary hilar tumor
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yun-Hen Liu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Hung-Pin Liu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Yi-Cheng Wu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Ming-Ju Hsieh
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Wei-Hsun Chen
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Yen Chu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Chien-Ying Liu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):362-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02804-1.
Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk NP, Bains M, Downey RJ, Rusch VW. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.030.
Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, Toloza E, Burfeind WR, Harpole DH Jr, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):420-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234892.79056.63.
Sihoe AD, Au SS, Cheung ML, Chow IK, Chu KM, Law CY, Wan M, Yim AP. Incidence of chest wall paresthesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun;25(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.018.
Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):726-8. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01219-0.
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Mendez L, Garcia J. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and right upper lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Dec;42(6):e169-71. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs482. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R, Garcia J. Video: Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):2078-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2127-x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, de la Torre M, Mendez L, Fernandez R. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy and other complex resections. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 6):S674-81. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.09.17.
Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, Shih CS, Liu CC. Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):793-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000712.
Ocakcioglu I, Alpay L, Demir M, Kiral H, Akyil M, Dogruyol T, Tezel C, Baysungur V, Yalcinkaya I. Is single port enough in minimally surgery for pneumothorax? Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4161-6. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Bhayani N, Rieder E. Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):659-67. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b5212.
Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042.
Liu YH, Chu Y, Wu YC, Yeh CJ, Liu CY, Hsieh MJ, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu HP. Natural orifice surgery in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jan;6(1):61-3. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.02. No abstract available.
Takata M, Watanabe G, Ushijima T, Ishikawa N. A novel internal thoracic artery harvesting technique via subxiphoid approach--for the least invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;9(5):891-2. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.212282. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Sharp RJ. Use of a subxiphoid incision for pectus bar placement in the repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1361-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.115.
Taniguchi Y, Suzuki Y, Suda T, Inoue T, Araki K, Ito N, Okada K, Ishiguro K, Nakamura H, Ohgi S. Video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral lung metastasectomy with a subxiphoid access port. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Sep;130(3):916-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.039. No abstract available.
Suda T, Ashikari S, Tochii S, Sugimura H, Hattori Y. Single-incision subxiphoid approach for bilateral metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):718-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.123.
Liu CC, Wang BY, Shih CS, Liu YH. Subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):3250-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Aug 23. No abstract available.
Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Sep;20(3):455-63. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00841-7.
Martins PS, Kallas EG, Neto MC, Dalboni MA, Blecher S, Salomao R. Upregulation of reactive oxygen species generation and phagocytosis, and increased apoptosis in human neutrophils during severe sepsis and septic shock. Shock. 2003 Sep;20(3):208-12. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000079425.52617.db.
Haugen TS, Skjonsberg OH, Kahler H, Lyberg T. Production of oxidants in alveolar macrophages and blood leukocytes. Eur Respir J. 1999 Nov;14(5):1100-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.14511009.
Romeo C, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, Turiaco N, Cifala S, Gentile C, Passaniti M, Marini H, Squadrito F, Altavilla D. Peritoneal macrophage activity after laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jan;38(1):97-101; discussion 97-101. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50019.
Ni Choileain N, Redmond HP. Cell response to surgery. Arch Surg. 2006 Nov;141(11):1132-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1132.
Wichmann MW, Huttl TP, Winter H, Spelsberg F, Angele MK, Heiss MM, Jauch KW. Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg. 2005 Jul;140(7):692-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.7.692.
Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, Stosslein R, Muller JM. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):600-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640090032. Epub 2001 Apr 3.
Ng CS, Wan S, Hui CW, Lee TW, Underwood MJ, Yim AP. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for early stage lung cancer - can short-term immunological advantages improve long-term survival? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):308-12.
Ng CS, Whelan RL, Lacy AM, Yim AP. Is minimal access surgery for cancer associated with immunologic benefits? World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0029-6.
Natsume T, Kawahira H, Hayashi H, Nabeya Y, Akai T, Horibe D, Shuto K, Akutsu Y, Matsushita K, Nomura F, Matsubara H. Low peritoneal and systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Mar-Apr;58(106):659-62.
von Delius S, Wilhelm D, Feussner H, Sager J, Becker V, Schuster T, Schneider A, Schmid RM, Meining A. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: cardiopulmonary safety of transesophageal mediastinoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):405-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243948. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
von Delius S, Schorn A, Grimm M, Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Schuster T, Stangassinger M, Feussner H, Schmid RM, Meining A. Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient and is associated with an improved cardiopulmonary response (PressurePig Study). Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):808-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256559. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
Navarro-Ripoll R, Martinez-Palli G, Guarner-Argente C, Cordova H, Martinez-Zamora MA, Comas J, Rodriguez de Miguel C, Beltran M, Rodriguez-D'Jesus A, Hernandez-Cera C, Llach J, Balust J, Fernandez-Esparrach G. On-demand endoscopic CO2 insufflation with feedback pressure regulation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy induces minimal hemodynamic and respiratory changes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.015.
Chu Y, Liu CY, Wu YC, Hsieh MJ, Chen TP, Chao YK, Wu CY, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Liu HP. Comparison of hemodynamic and inflammatory changes between transoral and transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050338. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
Lu HY, Chu Y, Wu YC, Liu CY, Hsieh MJ, Chao YK, Wu CY, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Liu HP. Hemodynamic and inflammatory responses following transumbilical and transthoracic lung wedge resection in a live canine model. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.027. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CGMH-IRB-104-7159A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.