Intravenous Iron for Treatment of Anaemia Before Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02632760

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

955 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-15

Study Completion Date

2024-11-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomised double-blind, controlled phase IV trial will compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of preoperative IV iron with placebo in patients with anaemia before elective cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preoperative anaemia is common (≈30%) in patients awaiting cardiac surgery, and is associated with increased complications, ICU and hospital stay, and mortality. The extent of anaemia is worsened by haemodilution occurring with cardiopulmonary bypass and surgical bleeding (average blood loss 0.5-1.5 litres), which in turn impair end-organ blood flow and tissue oxygen delivery. Further, the need for blood transfusion is greatly increased in anaemic patients, and is associated with poor outcomes. In addition, blood transfusions are costly (\>$700 per unit), with around 50% of all transfusions used in surgery being for cardiac surgery. The investigators have identified high rates of bleeding complications and transfusion requirements in Australian cardiac surgery; and in another international collaboration, it was found that anaemia, transfusion and kidney injury are inter-related after cardiac surgery. After risk-adjustment, the combination of these three risk factors was associated with a 3.5-fold (95% CI 2.3-5.2) increased odds of kidney injury.

Both anaemia and red cell transfusion are independent risk factors in major surgery. Some of the investigators reviewed Australian cardiac surgery patients from six Victorian hospitals, 2005-2011. We linked the ANZ Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons cardiac surgery database to laboratory data, including preoperative haemoglobin and all issued blood products (manuscript in preparation). Anaemia was defined according to the WHO definition (Hb \<130 g/L for males and \<120 g/L for females). There were 15,948 cardiac surgery patients available for inclusion in the analysis, of which 28% were anaemic. Anaemic patients were more likely to receive a red cell transfusion (71% vs. 40%, p\<0.001), more transfused units of blood (median 4 \[IQR 2-8\] vs. 3 \[2-5\], p\<0.001), and had higher 30-day mortality (5.4% vs. 1.9%, p\<0.001), new renal failure (43% vs. 26%, p\<0.001), and longer hospital stay in survivors (13 days \[8-23\] vs. 8 days \[6-14\], p\<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, preoperative anaemia was an independent predictor of mortality (adj. OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.88, p=0.003). Similar results were obtained when restricted to elective surgery, but with hospital stay 9 days (7-17) vs. 7 days (6-11), p\<0.001. Other large studies are consistent with this.

The investigators have also analysed data for patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (a validated outcomes registry from 211 hospitals worldwide). In 227,425 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, and found that preoperative anaemia was associated with increased 30-day mortality (adj. OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31-1.54) and morbidity (adj. OR 1.35, 1.30-1.40).

Alfred hospital (Melbourne) transfusion data for 2012-14 (n=2,091) show that anaemic (27% of cohort) and non-anaemic cardiac surgical patients had intraoperative red cell transfusion rates of 31% and 14%, respectively; p\<0.01.

Iron deficiency is the commonest cause of anaemia worldwide, and iron deficiency per se independently worsens outcomes after surgery. The traditional textbook definition of iron deficiency anaemia refers to depletion of the body's iron stores due to dietary deficiency or chronic blood loss - an absolute iron deficiency. Chronic disease and inflammation have a direct effect in the pathway of iron absorption and metabolism leading to a state of functional iron deficiency and anaemia. Specifically, the iron regulatory protein hepcidin is upregulated, blocking pathways of iron transport. This prevents iron absorption from the gut, further uptake by the reticuloendothelial system increases stores (ferritin), but distribution and transfer to the bone marrow is blocked. Consequently, despite normal or even increased body iron stores (with normal ferritin levels), these are artifactual, and a state of 'functional iron deficiency' exists. This is commonly seen in renal and cardiac disease and increasingly recognised as a cause for anaemia in the surgical patient. Importantly, IV iron has been shown to overcome this functional deficiency and correct anaemia.

IV iron therapy is effective in treating anaemia in medical (heart failure, kidney disease), post-partum, and preoperative settings (orthopaedic surgery, colon cancer resection, hysterectomy, hip/knee joint replacement. Earlier IV iron preparations using high molecular weight dextran were associated with anaphylaxis due to pre-formed antibodies, but newer preparations are safer, enabling delivery of a full treatment dose in 15 mins, so iron can be administered safely and quickly in outpatients. It is now readily available in Australia and is PBS-listed. This gives patients the equivalent dose of 12 months of tablets in only 15 mins.

Iron deficiency is very common in patients having coronary artery surgery. It is highly plausible that anaemia correction will improve patient outcome following cardiac surgery.However, some data suggest that free iron mediates free radical production associated with organ damage or infection in surgery and this balance between effective anaemia correction and potential risk needs further research. A definitive large trial is needed to determine if IV iron safely, effectively, and promptly corrects preoperative anaemia, and thus reduces risk in cardiac surgery.

The investigators undertook a Cochrane review of iron therapy to treat anaemia in adults including 4,745 participants in 21 trials. This found a trend for better haemoglobin levels with IV iron (MD 0.50 g/dL, 95% CI 0.73-0.27; six studies, N=769) but with considerable, unexplained heterogeneity. Differences in the proportion of participants requiring transfusion were imprecise (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.06; 8 studies, N=1,315). Thus the current evidence base is sparse; few randomised trials have been done and these were too small - there remains considerable equipoise.

Review of the literature on anaemia and iron therapy in cardiac surgery, which included 4 small trials of IV iron. Overall, half of all cardiac surgery patients were anaemic before surgery. Preoperative anaemia was found to be independently associated with higher mortality and blood transfusion rate, as well as longer ICU and hospital stay. As also shown by others, preoperative haematocrit was a powerful independent predictor of mortality, renal failure and deep sternal wound infection. In adjusted analyses each 5 point decrease in preoperative haematocrit was associated with an 8% increased risk of death (OR, 1.08; p\<0.0003), a 22% increased risk of postoperative renal failure (OR, 1.22; p\<0.0001), and a 10% increased risk of deep sternal wound infection (OR, 1.10; p\<0.01). There is a need for a well-designed, pragmatic trial to assess the role of preoperative anaemia treatment using IV iron in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anaemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ferric carboxymaltose

ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg or Iron isomaltoside 1000 mg given Intravenously

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ferric carboxymaltose

Intervention Type DRUG

treatment for Iron deficient anaemia

Placebo

Placebo intravenous infusion

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo - no active drug

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ferric carboxymaltose

treatment for Iron deficient anaemia

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

placebo - no active drug

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ferinject Iron isomaltoside No active drug

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with anaemia (males Hb \<130 g/L, females \<120 g/L) undergoing elective cardiac surgery, and available to receive trial drug 1- 10 weeks prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Known hypersensitivity to study drug (ferric carboxymaltose or equivalent) or its excipients
* Known or suspected haemoglobinopathy/thalassaemia
* Bone marrow disease
* Haemochromatosis
* Renal dialysis
* Erythropoietin or IV iron in the previous 4 weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayside Health

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Monash University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul S Myles, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Bayside Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alfred Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cameron MJ, Al Kharusi L, Gosselin A, Baradari PG, Chirico A, Amar-Zifkin A, Yang SS. Iron supplementation for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 4;9(2):E623-E626. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200204. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34088733 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

605/15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Thrombin in Cardiac Surgery
NCT04762576 UNKNOWN