Sequential Combo Immuno and Target Therapy (SECOMBIT) Study

NCT ID: NCT02631447

Last Updated: 2024-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

251 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-14

Study Completion Date

2024-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the best sequencing approach with the combination of target agents (LGX818 plus MEK162) and the combination of immunomodulatory antibodies (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) in patients with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600 mutation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The combination BRAF (B-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) inhibitor plus mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor seems to be more effective in the V600 BRAF mutated advanced melanoma patients compared to treatment with the BRAF inhibitors alone. In fact, a phase I-II study showed a better overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the combination arm (dabrafenib plus trametinib) respect to the single agent treatment (dabrafenib): 76% and 9.4 months versus 54% and 5.8 months respectively. Another phase I study with a similar combination (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib) showed an ORR of 85% in vemurafenib-naïve patients.

Recently, the results of a phase I study about the combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab have been reported. In this study at the selected schedule (ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and nivolumab 1 mg/kg), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Reponses were durable, although longer follow-up is needed.

A recent phase I study has shown a high rate of liver toxicity with the combo ipilimumab plus vemurafenib . which makes difficult a combination with these two different drugs. Moreover, a better efficacy of the sequencing treatment BRAF inhibitors/ipilimumab vs. the single agent treatment was also observed; for this reason it was also suggested to start immunotherapy treatment in the BRAF V600 mutated melanoma population as first option, in order to increase the percentage of patients who can benefit from the sequencing, considering the possibility of a fast progression of the disease after the BRAF inhibitors treatment.

Taking into account these considerations, it seems impossible to think to combine all the four compounds (the target agents and immunomodulating monoclonal antibodies). The risk of a high rate of toxicity is realistic and would render this approach inapplicable.

Sequencing with these different combinations seems to be more feasible. However, also in this case it would be important to start with the best combination in order to give to the patients the best chance to increase the overall survival.

The aim of this prospective randomized phase II study is to evaluate the sequencing of these two different combinations and evaluate which is the best of these approaches.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Melanoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Combo Target/Combo Immuno

Combo Target (LGX818 450 mg p.o. od + MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid) until PD; then Combo Immuno (nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks) until PD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LGX818

Intervention Type DRUG

LGX818 450 mg p.o. od

MEK162

Intervention Type DRUG

MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid

Nivolumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Arm B: Como immuno/Combo Target

Combo Immuno (nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks) until PD; then Combo Target (LGX818 450 mg p.o. od + MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid) until PD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LGX818

Intervention Type DRUG

LGX818 450 mg p.o. od

MEK162

Intervention Type DRUG

MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid

Nivolumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Arm C: Sandwich

Combo Target (LGX818 450 mg p.o. od + MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid) for 8 weeks followed by Combo Immuno (nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks) until PD; then Combo Target (LGX818 450 mg p.o. od + MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid) until PD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LGX818

Intervention Type DRUG

LGX818 450 mg p.o. od

MEK162

Intervention Type DRUG

MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid

Nivolumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LGX818

LGX818 450 mg p.o. od

Intervention Type DRUG

MEK162

MEK162 45 mg p.o. bid

Intervention Type DRUG

Nivolumab

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Ipilimumab

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg solution IV combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution IV every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Combo target IMP3 Combo target IMP4 Combo Immuno IMP1 Combo Immuno IMP2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients of either sex aged ≥ 18 years;
2. Histologically confirmed stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma with the BRAF V600 mutation. Patients with mucosal melanoma (but not those with ocular melanoma) are eligible for study participation;
3. Treatment naïve for metastatic disease patients. Previous adjuvant treatment, included checkpoint inhibitors anti CTLA-4, anti PD-1/PDL-1 is allowed, except for stage IV (if completed at least 6 weeks prior to randomization, and all related adverse events have either returned to baseline or stabilized). BRAF inhibitor treatment in adjuvant setting is not permitted.
4. Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) per RECIST 1.1 criteria;
5. Presence of BRAF V600E or V600K mutation in tumor tissue prior to enrollment;
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1;
7. Tumor tissue from an unresectable or metastatic site of disease must be provided for biomarker analyses. An archive sample is mandatory at the screening visit; however, a new sample collection would be preferable;
8. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test result at baseline and must practice two highly effective methods of contraception for the total study duration plus 23 weeks (i.e. 30 days plus the time required for nivolumab to undergo five half lives) after the last dose of nivolumab and ipilimumab and 30 days after the last dose of binimetinib and encorafenib for female subjects. Additional pregnancy testing must be performed every 6 weeks during the treatment Combo-Immuno and every 4 weeks during the treatment Combo-Target, as well as at the end of the systemic exposure;
9. Men who are sexually active with women of childbearing potential must practice a reliable method of contraception for the total study duration plus 31 weeks (i.e. 80 days plus the time required for nivolumab to undergo five half lives) after the last dose of nivolumab and ipilimumab and 90 days after the last dose of binimetinib and encorafenib;
10. Adequate bone marrow haematological function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L AND platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L AND haemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL;
11. Adequate liver function: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) AND aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 X ULN (\< 5 x ULN if liver metastases);
12. Adequate renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL OR creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min in males and ≥ 50 mL/min in females (calculated according to Cockroft-Gault formula);
13. Serum calcium levels, international normalised ratio (INR) and partial thromboplastin time were within normal limits;
14. Life expectancy of at least 3 months;
15. Ability to understand study-related patient information and provision of written informed consent for participation in the study.
16. Adequate electrolytes at Baseline, defined as serum potassium and magnesium levels within institutional normal limits (Note: replacement treatment to achieve adequate electrolytes will be allowed).
17. Adequate cardiac function:

* left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% as determined by a multigated --acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram,
* QTc interval ≤ 480 ms (preferably the mean from triplicate ECGs)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Active brain metastases. Subjects with brain metastases are eligible if these have been treated and there is no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of progression for at least 4 weeks after treatment is complete and within 28 days prior to first dose of study drug administration. There must also be no requirement for immunosuppressive doses of systemic corticosteroids (\> 10 mg/day prednisone equivalents) for at least 2 weeks prior to study drug administration;
2. Subjects with active, known or suspected autoimmune disease;
3. Subjects with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\>10 mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of treatment;
4. Prior treatment for stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma with an anti-Programmed Death receptor-1 (PD-1), anti-Programmed Death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1), anti-PD-L2, or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody;
5. Female subjects who are pregnant (positive pregnancy test), breast-feeding, or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control;
6. Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study, or which would jeopardize compliance with the protocol, or would interfere with the results of the study;
7. Patients with a history of uncontrolled cardiovascular or interstitial lung disease and evidence or risk of retinal vein occlusion or central serous retinopathy (patients with a history of cardiovascular or interstitial lung disease and evidence or risk of retinal vein occlusion or central serous retinopathy (past or present evidence of rethinophaty central serous retinopathy - CSR -, occlusion of retinal - RVOo retinal degenerative disease) or ophthalmopathy, which according to the ophthalmologic evaluation at baseline could be considered a risk factor for CSR / RVO ( eg. cupping of the optic disc, visual field defect, intraocular pressure - (eg: central IOP - \> 21 mmHg);
8. Previous or concurrent malignancy. Exceptions: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer; in situ carcinoma of the cervix, treated curatively and without evidence of recurrence for at least 3 years prior to study entry; or other solid tumor treated curatively, and without evidence of recurrence for at least 3 years prior to study entry
9. History of Gilbert's syndrome;
10. Inability to regularly access centre facilities for logistical or other reasons;
11. History of poor co-operation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability;
12. Participation in any interventional drug or medical device study within 30 days prior to treatment start.
13. Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBV sAg) or hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV antibody) indicating acute or chronic infection;
14. Known history of testing positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
15. Receipt of live vaccine within 30 days prior to study drug administration.
16. History of severe or life-threatening skin adverse events or reactions to drugs.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinical Research Technology S.r.l.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Melanoma Onlus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paolo Ascierto, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Fondazione Melanoma Onlus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Paracelsus Medical University

Salzburg, AT, Austria

Site Status

Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciencies - University Clinic

Sankt Pölten, AT, Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Graz

Graz, AU, Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

University of Tuebingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

University of Athens

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

IRCCS - Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per la Cura e lo Studio dei Tumori (I.R.S.T) S.r.l.

Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy

Site Status

National Institute of Cancer

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

IRCCS San Martino - IST

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IRCCS

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Federico II

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Oncologico Veneto

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - IDI - IRCCS

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

San Giovanni Rotondo, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Udine

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center

Warsaw, PL, Poland

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Quiròn Dexeus

Barcelona, SP, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínic Barcelona

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital Zurich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria France Germany Greece Italy Poland Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ascierto PA, Mandala M, Ferrucci PF, Guidoboni M, Rutkowski P, Ferraresi V, Arance A, Guida M, Maiello E, Gogas H, Richtig E, Quaglino P, Lebbe C, Helgadottir H, Queirolo P, Spagnolo F, Tucci M, Del Vecchio M, Gonzalez-Cao M, Minisini AM, De Placido S, Sanmamed MF, Casula M, Bulgarelli J, Pisano M, Piccinini C, Piccin L, Cossu A, Mallardo D, Paone M, Vitale MG, Melero I, Grimaldi AM, Giannarelli D, Palmieri G, Dummer R, Sileni VC. Sequencing of Checkpoint or BRAF/MEK Inhibitors on Brain Metastases in Melanoma. NEJM Evid. 2024 Oct;3(10):EVIDoa2400087. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400087. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39315864 (View on PubMed)

Ascierto PA, Casula M, Bulgarelli J, Pisano M, Piccinini C, Piccin L, Cossu A, Mandala M, Ferrucci PF, Guidoboni M, Rutkowski P, Ferraresi V, Arance A, Guida M, Maiello E, Gogas H, Richtig E, Fierro MT, Lebbe C, Helgadottir H, Queirolo P, Spagnolo F, Tucci M, Del Vecchio M, Cao MG, Minisini AM, De Placido S, Sanmamed MF, Mallardo D, Paone M, Vitale MG, Melero I, Grimaldi AM, Giannarelli D, Dummer R, Sileni VC, Palmieri G. Sequential immunotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma: 4-year survival and biomarkers evaluation from the phase II SECOMBIT trial. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 2;15(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44475-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38167503 (View on PubMed)

Ascierto PA, Mandala M, Ferrucci PF, Guidoboni M, Rutkowski P, Ferraresi V, Arance A, Guida M, Maiello E, Gogas H, Richtig E, Fierro MT, Lebbe C, Helgadottir H, Queirolo P, Spagnolo F, Tucci M, Del Vecchio M, Gonzales Cao M, Minisini AM, De Placido S, Sanmamed MF, Mallardo D, Curvietto M, Melero I, Palmieri G, Grimaldi AM, Giannarelli D, Dummer R, Chiarion Sileni V. Sequencing of Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab and Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib for Untreated BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma (SECOMBIT): A Randomized, Three-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):212-221. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02961. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36049147 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-004842-92

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SECOMBIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.