Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2008-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After the approval of the Ethics Committee and the patients being informed and taking informed consent from them 18 female 23 male totally 41 patients between the age of 20-60 years old, who had lumbar disc hernia, under general anesthesia have been taken under the study. The patients have been divided into two groups by closed envelope drawing method, randomly. All patients cognitive functions were evaluated by MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) during the premedication visit. For this study group Standardized Mini Mental Test Examination (SMMT-E) were used, which has quite practical usage, for the untrained patients, and test composed of question-answer in order to calculate the remembering, caution and calculation structure and the scores were recorded. All patients had received the same anesthesia induction with propofol infusion (started at firstly 12 mg. kg-1 for the 30 minutes, the second 30 minutes 9 mg. kg-1 and the BIS(bispectral index) values were arranged between 40-60 until the end of the operation), and remifentanil infusion (0.5 μg.kg-1 was applied as opioid and was arranged according to the tension artery and heart rate). In the dexmedetomidine group, dexmedetomidine infusion had started as 0.5 μg.kg-1 without making the loading dose and the dose change was not made. Rocuronium 0.5 mg. kg-1 iv. was applied for the endotracheal intubation. After the operation all patients have taken to the recovery room.
Then the tests of cognitive function evaluation were repeated as postoperative 2nd hour, 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Cognitive Outcome and Brain Injury Markers
NCT03585452
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Neurocognitive Disorder
NCT06689137
Effects of Dexmedetomidine Target Controlled Infusion on Patient State Index Values and Electroencephalographic Spectrum During Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol
NCT07259460
Dexmedetomidinine in the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05849597
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Recovery Profiles of Elderly Patients
NCT01851005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Induction of propofol infusion in all two groups was started as firstly 12 mg. kg-1 for the 30 minutes, the second 30 minutes 9 mg. kg-1 and the BIS values were arranged between 40-60 until the end of the operation. At the same time remifentanil infusion 0.5 μg.kg-1 was applied as opioid and arranged according to the tension artery and heart rate. The dexmedetomidine infusion has been started as 0.5 μg.kg-1 without making the loading dose and the dose change was not made. Rocuronium 0.5 mg. kg-1 iv. was applied for the endotracheal intubation. After intubation the carbon dioxide concentration was recorded in all periods.
The patients were ventilated mechanically after the intubation in order to be ETCO2 (end-tidal carbon dioxide) 30-44 mmHg, tidal volume 8-10 mL. kg-1 . In case of tachycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was reduced in case of bradycardia or hypertension while the opioid dose was being increased. Propofol infusion was arranged to be kept in between BİS score 40-50. The effect of the used muscle relaxant was returned by neostigmine 0,05- 0,07 mg. kg-1 i.v. and atropin 0,03 mg. kg -1 i.v. After the operation all patients have been taken to the recovery room.
Then the tests of cognitive function evaluation were repeated as postoperative 2nd hour, 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (TIVA)
Only propofol (started as firstly 12 mg. kg-1 for the 30 minutes, the second 30 minutes 9 mg. kg-1) and remifentanil infusion (0.5 μg.kg-1) and rocuronium for intubation
Remifentanil
In case of tachycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was reduced, in case of bradycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was increased
Propofol
BIS values were arranged 40-60 until the end of operation
Rocuronium
0.5 mg/kg iv for intubation, no changes
Group 2 (TIVA+D)
Propofol started as firstly 12 mg. kg-1 for the 30 minutes, the second 30 minutes 9 mg. kg-1) and remifentanil infusion (0.5 μg.kg-1),and also dexmedetomidine infusion (started as 0.5 μg.kg-1 without making the loading dose and the dose change was not made during the operation) and rocuronium for intubation
Remifentanil
In case of tachycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was reduced, in case of bradycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was increased
Propofol
BIS values were arranged 40-60 until the end of operation
Dexmedetomidine
0.5 microgram/kg infusion, no changes
Rocuronium
0.5 mg/kg iv for intubation, no changes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
In case of tachycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was reduced, in case of bradycardia or hypertension the opioid dose was increased
Propofol
BIS values were arranged 40-60 until the end of operation
Dexmedetomidine
0.5 microgram/kg infusion, no changes
Rocuronium
0.5 mg/kg iv for intubation, no changes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 20-60 years old
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification) classification I-II
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with hepatic, renal or neurological diseases and
* patients using sedative- hypnotic, anticonvulsive and stimulant drugs
* One of the patient excluded from the study (can not be able to reached after surgery)
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uludag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hale Aksu Erdost
Specialist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hulya Bilgin, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Uludag University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uludag University
Bursa, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Molloy DW, Standish TI. A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:87-94; discussion 143-50. doi: 10.1017/s1041610297004754.
Magni G, Baisi F, La Rosa I, Imperiale C, Fabbrini V, Pennacchiotti ML, Rosa G. No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):134-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16.
Gurbet A, Basagan-Mogol E, Turker G, Ugun F, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jul;53(7):646-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03021622.
Weinbroum AA, Geller E. Flumazenil improves cognitive and neuromotor emergence and attenuates shivering after halothane-, enflurane- and isoflurane-based anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Nov;48(10):963-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03016585.
Kostopanagiotou G, Markantonis SL, Polydorou M, Pandazi A, Kottis G. Recovery and cognitive function after fentanyl or remifentanil administration for carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.008.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-21/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.