Piperacllin Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT ID: NCT02619149
Last Updated: 2018-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2018-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Empirical Antibiotics in Acute Inflammatory Gallbladder Disease
NCT04321902
Effectiveness of Empirical Antibiotic Use in Mild to Moderate Acute Inflammatory Gallbladder Disease
NCT05339282
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01888822
Is it Fair to Use Antibiotics After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Patients With Acutely Inflamed Gallbladder?
NCT02490293
The Role of Postoperative Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06607887
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inflammation in the gallbladder due to obstruction of gallstones (acute cholecystitis) is a common condition and one of the most common indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In most cases, the procedure may be performed without great risk of severe complications. In some cases, however, the congested bile in the gallbladder may become infected.
In clinical routine, acute cholecystitis is often managed as an infectious condition, despite the fact that previous studies have shown that the bile in most cases of acute cholecystitis is sterile. On the other hand, antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of surgical site infections in those cases when there is a manifest bacterial contamination and, perhaps, also reduce the risk of contamination. There is firm evidence supporting acute surgery, prefereably laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the benefit from antibiotic treatment has not been full evaluated.
Previous studies have shown that the benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis is very limited in case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstone disease. There are, however, very few studies that have assessed antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for acute cholecystitis.
The aim of the present study is to assess the benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Methods The study is based on patients admitted for acute cholecystitis at the department of acute surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge. In case the patients fulfill the inclusion critera and are suitable for laparoscopic surgery, written and oral information about the study is given.
In case they agree to participate in the study, treatment allocation is determined by a sealed envelope system. The patients are randomised to receive either Piperacillin 4g x 3 iv preoperatively as prophylaxis or placebo (saline infusion). The study is double-blind. Piperacillin/placebo is administrated by a research nurse after allocation. The infusion is covered by a bag in order to maintain blinding. Neither the surgeon performing the procedure, nor the patient or staff caring for the patient are informed about the allocation. The procedure should be performed within 24 days after inclusion. Administration of Piperacillin/placebo is started immediately after inclusion and continued until the procedure is completed.
If a categorical indication for antibiotic treatment occurs during surgery, the allocated infusion is removed and the patient is given antibiotic as decided by the surgeon. In such cases, the patient stays in the study and is analysed according to an intention to treat.
During the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least 10 cc of bile is aspirated under sterile conditions from the fundus of the gallbladder with a long needle before the start of the peritoneum dissection. The bile is sent for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Bacteria are identified using standard laboratory procedures.
Sample size estimation If the incidence of positive cultures is 50% and in the placebo group and this is reduced to 25% if antibiotic prophylaxis is given, 36 patients in each arm would be required in order to reach 80% chance of detecting this difference at a p\<0.05 level of significance (one sided test). A total sample of 100 patients should thus be sufficient to test the primary outcome measure.
Follow-up Samples for CRP, interleukins, bilirubin, AST, ALT and ALP are taken daily from the peroperative day until postoperative day 2.
Quality of life is assessed by SF-36 preoperatively. Level of pain is estimated based on the MacGill Pain Questionnaire from the day of the procedure until postoperative day 2.
One month postoperatively, the patient is invited to follow-up. At follow-up, SF-36 is filled in.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product
Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product
Piperacillin-Tazobactam (extended-spectrum, beta-lactamase inhibitor) iv peroperatively as prophylaxis
Control
Saline solution
Saline solution
Saline iv as placebo control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product
Piperacillin-Tazobactam (extended-spectrum, beta-lactamase inhibitor) iv peroperatively as prophylaxis
Saline solution
Saline iv as placebo control
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First acute symptoms occurring within five days before surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery
* Allergy against beta-lactame antibiotics
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gabriel Sandblom
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Folke Hammarqvist, Ass Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Stockholm
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Digestive Diseases
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jaafar G, Sandblom G, Lundell L, Hammarqvist F. Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1201-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AVAC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.