Comparison of the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis System to 2D Digital Mammography
NCT ID: NCT02615509
Last Updated: 2020-05-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
347 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2018-02-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Compared to Full Field Digital Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts
NCT02042456
Breast Cancer Detection: Comparison of Breast Tomosynthesis and Conventional Mammography
NCT01669148
Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography With Digital Breast Tomography for Screening Call-Back Rates
NCT01236781
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Pivotal Trial
NCT02692209
Testing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Regular Mammogram in Detecting Breast Cancer in Women Having Screening Mammogram
NCT00535678
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 800 women who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in chronological order from up to 3 different US sites with one study investigator for each site. Two cohorts of patients will be enrolled (i.e., Biopsy and Screening Cohorts). Paired sets of a standard 4-view exam will be collected both from Philips Tomosynthesis system (Tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D images) and a FDA-cleared FFDM system. All enrolled cases will be quality controlled for completeness of image and patient information.
The reading portion of the study will include approximately 300 normal cases (including some cases determined to be normal after call back after screening mammography), 65 cancer cases, and 40 biopsy proven benign cases.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the safety and clinical performance of the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis system (Tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D) images to conventional 2D mammography images (FFDM).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Imaging on experimental tomo device
Women will have a bilateral two-view mammogram (a total of four images) with the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis system and a bilateral two-view mammogram (a total of four images) with an FFDM system. The order of this will be randomised.
After collecting the cases together with ground truth a readers study will be performed.
Imaging on experimental tomo device
The system used for imaging in the experimental arm is the Philips MicroDose tomography system. The system used for imaging in the active comparator is a standard FFDM system
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Imaging on experimental tomo device
The system used for imaging in the experimental arm is the Philips MicroDose tomography system. The system used for imaging in the active comparator is a standard FFDM system
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No contraindication for routine bilateral mammography
Screening Cohort
* Patient presents for a routine screening mammogram Biopsy Cohort
* Patient is scheduled for a biopsy
* Patient has a screening detected abnormality
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is breast feeding; OR
* Patient is unable or unwilling to give informed consent, including consent to reuse data for future research; OR,
* Patient has breast implants; OR
* Patient has previous surgical biopsy; OR
* Patient has previous breast cancer; OR
* Patient presented to screening with clinical symptoms (e.g. palpable lump, nipple discharge, nipple retraction, skin irritation or dimpling)
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philips Digital Mammography Sweden AB
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Etta Pisano, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9RWH8K
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.